Vague. Instead of saying "x, y, z, and stuff like that" say "x happens and blah blah blah, y does this and that and blah blah, and sometimes if you do this z is blah blah" Describe each thing in detail. I like the concept, but your suggestion is very vague.
1. The game is E rated, and guns in minecraft would drive away a kid friendly audience, parents would not be pleased. This would lessen income, and less would buy the game. The Young audience is the most abundant out of all the people who play minecraft, this is obvious. If parents caught their children playing a game rated E that included guns, they would be outraged.
Why not remove bows and swords, as they're just as inherently violent as firearms? Also, Minecraft isn't rated E. The Xbox version is rated E10+, and the PC version isn't rated.
4. The game is not in ancient era. It is in the Medieval Era. (Minecarts and Mines is the furthest Minecraft has come in technology.) Guns entered the world in the Rennaissance Era.
Nope, guns existed long before the Renaissance, and many things in Minecraft (such as pistons and electricity (redstone))
5. Why add guns in Minecraft? It is akward, and above all else would ONLY cause bad things to happen (Everything I listed above.) Guns seem like a major risk to take rather than upgrading a bow.
Have you actually read some of the suggestions? You know, guns don't have to be a direct upgrade to bows, but rather, they could be a sidegrade.
but if we add them it'll cause a Chain Reaction. First Rifles than More advanced guns than even More advanced guns than eventually High tech level that ruins the game for 75% of the people who play MC, who now have to play single-player or on small servers where guns are disabled.
I don't like the idea of guns in a "sort of medieval game".. Next thing you know.. We will be suggesting TV's to be added to the game and freakin' lightsabers! (Which would be awesome though..(The Star Wars part))
But if we add redstone, people will want computers that can be coded in C++.
But if we add TNT, people will want nukes.
But if we add the Nether, people will want ghosts, demons, poltergeists, and such.
But if we add minecarts, people will want modern trains.
But if we add enchantments and XP, people will want grinding, leveling up mining skills, dungeon raids, and turn based combat.
But if we add boats, people will want submarines.
Anyone else want to play the "'if x is added people will want y' excuse" game?
has it not occurred to you that minecraft is supposed to be a children's game? I mean look around! Everything is made up of blocks, animations are very simple and basic (like the arm swing when punching a tree or player.)
Approach huge, nearly impenetrable enemy base on a factions server. Disable PVP and mine into base. Enable PVP, fill base with TNT, disable PVP and run away as the base is destroyed.
As the owner of a Terraria server, I can't stand the PVP toggle for basically this reason.
YOU how dare you, getting my hopes up. I would support this idea, because it is not that bad. But you made me think that this would be a thread about the principality of Sealand in minecraft, which should be a thing.
I hate the idea of cutscenes in Minecraft. While it's fine for some games, in open world games like Minecraft that give you total freedom, taking over the player's game for several seconds would be jarring and out of place. Also, it would leave you completely defenseless on SMP.
No, not really. I'm pretty sure most depictions of Hell usually contains tortured souls, demons, unholy monstrosities, etc. Simply containing fire, lava, and a dangerous landscape in no way makes it Hell-like or inappropriate for children.
I'm fairly smart, as well as agile and mildly strong. I'm ambidextrous, which I guess is technically a skill. I'm an expert in the areas of Science, History, and English. (Ironically I'm a big fan of Oxford commas.) I also have a ridiculously good memory (sadly not photographic). I also have an extremely fast metabolism. However, I have difficulty learning new skills (Fallout gifted trait?).
If it bothers you, just go to a server where it isn't permitted. Mojang isn't going to force servers to ban people for using profanity just because it offends or annoys a few people.
0
0
0
0
1
Why not remove bows and swords, as they're just as inherently violent as firearms? Also, Minecraft isn't rated E. The Xbox version is rated E10+, and the PC version isn't rated.
Nope, guns existed long before the Renaissance, and many things in Minecraft (such as pistons and electricity (redstone))
Have you actually read some of the suggestions? You know, guns don't have to be a direct upgrade to bows, but rather, they could be a sidegrade.
"there's a mod for that" is a reportable offense.
0
I know, but the "'if x is added people will want y' excuse" sounds funnier.
3
But if we add redstone, people will want computers that can be coded in C++.
But if we add TNT, people will want nukes.
But if we add the Nether, people will want ghosts, demons, poltergeists, and such.
But if we add minecarts, people will want modern trains.
But if we add enchantments and XP, people will want grinding, leveling up mining skills, dungeon raids, and turn based combat.
But if we add boats, people will want submarines.
Anyone else want to play the "'if x is added people will want y' excuse" game?
0
Minimalism =/= childish or kid-friendly.
0
Approach huge, nearly impenetrable enemy base on a factions server. Disable PVP and mine into base. Enable PVP, fill base with TNT, disable PVP and run away as the base is destroyed.
As the owner of a Terraria server, I can't stand the PVP toggle for basically this reason.
0
That's what I was hoping for too... D:
0
0
No, not really. I'm pretty sure most depictions of Hell usually contains tortured souls, demons, unholy monstrosities, etc. Simply containing fire, lava, and a dangerous landscape in no way makes it Hell-like or inappropriate for children.
0
0
Of course, usually everyone tries to ruin the video by targeting him.
2