• 1

    posted a message on Minecraft Is Too Easy (MITE) Mod

    Hi there! After a bit of a struggle, I finally got the mod itself working, but for whatever reason, the resource pack isn't? It's the easiest part to install, so I know I didn't do that wrong, at least, but when I go into the resource packs tab in-game, even though it shows up, it won't let me click it (or standard, for that matter.) The screen just looks like it normally would, except that the little white box which indicates which resource pack is selected is completely gone, making it seem like neither of them are. When I start a world, the mod seems to be working fine (three hearts, etc.), but a red message in the upper corner says "Resource not found: pack.png - Press [c] to clear error message." If anyone knows what's wrong, could you help me out? And if not, could you just let me know if the resource pack is absolutely imperative to the gameplay? Thank you <3

    Posted in: Minecraft Mods
  • 1

    posted a message on Mo' Creatures - v12.0.0 for Minecraft 1.12.1!! Now Opensource!!
    Quote from AnnoyingEggz

    I've heard the talks about Mo creatures for 1.5.2? Where?
    Go to the first page and there is a dev build :3
    Posted in: Minecraft Mods
  • 1

    posted a message on Mo' Creatures - v12.0.0 for Minecraft 1.12.1!! Now Opensource!!

    That's exactly not what he actually states very clearly.
    His words are that Only YogBox may redistribute his mod. It does not say, "except for private server packs."
    His words are that modpacks do not have his permission.

    This is a fairly unambiguous statement.
    There are no caveats or allowances in his actual words that permit what you suggest. Nothing there about making an exception for anything other than YogBox and YogBox alone. Then he is specific about not bothering him with email or PM that the answer is unequivocally NO.

    If you know of some other posting that is more recent and which does contain a caveat allowing use in private mod packs, I would be delighted to check it out.


    This is from the policy statement for the server in question...



    This is the standard that should be applied by anyone who respects the work that a mod author puts into his mod.
    Not, "well he didn't specifically say that private packs are forbidden."
    Unless he says, "private server packs are permitted," nobody should be making an assumption that he means this.
    Bro, he says not to "redistribute" the mod. This doesn't mean that you cannot make a private modpack for you and your friends. It means that you are not allowed to post a mod pack with mo creatures in it on the mc forums or any other sharing website and claim the work as your own. Please just stop looking for trouble, it's like you're trying to get someone to yell at you so other people will pity you.
    Posted in: Minecraft Mods
  • 1

    posted a message on Mo' Creatures - v12.0.0 for Minecraft 1.12.1!! Now Opensource!!
    Quote from Timendainum

    How should I be grateful for a mod I cannot run on my server, because the author won't let anyone download his code unless they click on his AdFly link?

    Why are you grateful? Rather than downloading a nicely prepacked mod pack that someone else has already prepared, DrZ instead forces you and your friends to each install the mod manually.

    Not to mention, based on his own admission, and the many reports above, this mod will lag your server so hard you have to remove it anyways.

    The idea of this mod is cool. I'm quite grateful for that. But the implementation and distribution of this mod don't seem to have much to be grateful about.
    *Trys very hard to calm self down before replying* This mod is implemented and distributed wonderfully. I am grateful because Dr.Zhark takes the time to work very very hard to make this absolutely wonderful mod for us. I would actually not like a "nicely prepacked modpack" because half of the time those "nicely prepacked modpacks" jam mods you don't even want down your throat. You should not bring your rage and complaints to Dr.Z just because you have a problem with something he did. If you get a petition with 500,000 signatures on it that says that more people than just you don't want to take the time to just download the mod and grin and bear it, then you are welcome to give me a link to it and come rage and troll here. Thank you for your business, good sir, good luck with the petition thing. As for me, I'd just like to say Thank you so much for the time and effort you put into this absolutely amazing mod Dr.Z!
    Posted in: Minecraft Mods
  • 2

    posted a message on Mo' Creatures - v12.0.0 for Minecraft 1.12.1!! Now Opensource!!
    Quote from Timendainum

    You don't like idiotic? Okay, how about elitist then?

    Everyone makes mods on their own free time. For free. That's why modders make mods and don't work for video game companies. I get it. I've done my share of modding and hobbyist game development, I know the deal.

    When modders release mods, and I like them, and they offer downloads through AdFly, or whatever. I typically don't mind, if the modder isn't a jerk. Usually when modders provide a free and AdFly link, I will do them a solid and click the AdFly. I get it, you put a lot of work into it, you would like to make some cash. Great. Good for you.

    The problem is you are being an elitist because you refuse to allow you mod added to publicly downloadable mod packs. Lots of server operators don't want to deal with having to put together these packs themselves when there are many large ones out there already. Why do the work again that's already been done and tested?

    The entire point is moot though because of this this entry in your known bugs list:


    I realise I am being a bit of a ahole, but honestly I am fed up with elitist modders with ridiculous distribution policies like yours.

    Ok you need to shutup usually I don't go off on people like this but reading this post just.... gosh. Each and every one of us is SO lucky Dr.Zhark puts in so much work for us to make this amazing mod and doesnt charge to put it out. Do you have any idea how many mods have gone out of commission because the modder lost ambition or wasn't getting enough donations? A LOT. His rules for his mod are not "ridiculous" he is allowed by law to decide whether or not he wants his work redistributed or not. There are a TON of mods that do not allow you to redistribute their work. The reason for that is that the modders want to be able to know and control where their mods go out and they don't want others to profit off of or take credit for their thousands of hours of work. If you don't like Dr.Zhark's policy then don't download his AMAZING mod.
    Posted in: Minecraft Mods
  • 1

    posted a message on Minecon 2013 Set For the US East Coast, Details To Follow
    PLEASE BE IN NY OR VA! PLEASE! IVE WANTED TO ATTEND FOR TWO YEARS AND ITS ALWAYS TOO FAR! If it's in florida i will be heartbroken :'( it will be just out of reach
    Posted in: Minecraft News
  • 1

    posted a message on OptiFine HD (FPS Boost, Dynamic Lights, Shaders and much more)
    Quote from TheRad

    It's a really annoying fix though. Right now it only lasts until you restart the game and I am trying to figure out why. I am no scripter so I can't really identify anything in the script but I have just tested all the options and figured out that you can no longer permanently fix this issue.
    They really should just release a fix for it.
    Posted in: Minecraft Mods
  • 1

    posted a message on Redstone Update, 1.6, 1.7... 1.9, then what?
    If minecraft ends soon ill cry, make fun if you want but this is the best game ever in my opinion and one of the most freedom-based and popular games i know!
    Posted in: Future Updates
  • 1

    posted a message on PLEOPLE, you MUST read this about MC 1.6
    This is one of the most useless threads i have ever seen besides *Free Minecraft Codes Here!*. Many people already know such things and all you really did is give a link that people could just search for if they're curious enough. You didnt write much and some of your information is wrong, and yes, tbh, what in the nether is a pleople?
    Posted in: Future Updates
  • 2

    posted a message on DrZhark's Mo' Creatures (mod suggestion thread)
    Quote from AnneTameris

    Maybe can DrZhark make
    Tameable WWolfs, caus i want them as a pet and tame them with meat.
    Tameable Dragons, caus i like dragons and if you can tame them in the next update, then it is great!
    Maybe i can make some more ideas later,
    And maybe he can make vampires
    AnneTameris
    meh personally I wouldn't want tameable werewolves or vampires in the mod because who would want to go out and tame a hostile mob at the risk of their life? and i just dont think vampires are something that should be added to the mod (but that's just my opinion)
    Posted in: Mods Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.