Actually, an opt-out filter would be a compromise and not a restriction.
Members who can take swearing can turn off the filter, meanwhile younger children(unless they are looking for it), won't get in trouble.
I give up <.< But im not a informatic genius how could I know all that?
It isn't a matter of knowledge, your statement could easily be disprove with some common sense, in the form of the question: "Why just light a house on fire when worse damage can be done?"
You don't even need to know how computers work.
0
0
Members who can take swearing can turn off the filter, meanwhile younger children(unless they are looking for it), won't get in trouble.
0
0
Neurological problems in my hands. Or something. Maybe it's these mittens.
0
You haxed my list!!!!
0
Got it right on the spot. Normal is a tad laggy, but I can't see the sky in short.
0
2. The program sucks, do it manually.
0
0
0
Please include my list.
0
It isn't a matter of knowledge, your statement could easily be disprove with some common sense, in the form of the question: "Why just light a house on fire when worse damage can be done?"
You don't even need to know how computers work.
0
* delete cookie *
0
0
Pure substitution ciphers are easy to break if the cyphertext is long enough.
0