• 2

    posted a message on Starting from scratch; Launcher vanishes when I click Play.
    You're clearly experienced in modding than I, but I'll give it a shot.

    Double-check your Mods folder. Perhaps instead of "[...]\.minecraft\1.7.2\mods" it might be
    "[...]\.minecraft\versions\1.7.2\mods"

    Readjust JVM Arguments. Sometimes mods don't like memory adjustments (eg. -Xmx8G -Xms4G).

    See if you can still run a Vanilla profile (or standard launcher). This will at least narrow down where something went wrong.

    Last but not least, if you've changed Java versions, update your Profile(s) accordingly.

    Good luck. :P
    Posted in: Java Edition Support
  • 1

    posted a message on Nice environment, Trustworthy and Helpful people, and we have TS3. No cheating, no glitching allowed. 16+
    Quote from dn69141 jump
    "Dad: 29
    Mom: 30 (old jokes are welcomed)
    Daughter: 11 "

    "[...]only want kids to join if family members will be present on the server, and if the kids can behave[...]

    I would hardly call 30 old, but to each their own. :)

    As for families, I would recommend that it be open to their parents as well, not just the kids.

    Just food for thought. Have fun. :)
    Posted in: Minecraft Realms
  • 2

    posted a message on Minecraft is Dead
    I can't say I really care.

    Whether I play some video game or not is not dependent on what other people think about it, at least any farther than practical and logistical concerns. (ie. no public interest lowers chances of development, sequels, etc).

    There's my post for the year. Whoopee. :/
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Mojang Announcement: EULA, and Servers
    Quote from BestMinerGavin

    How is that at all relevant to my comment. Your other comments don't seem to be so relevant either.

    You claim that Hypixel has permission from Mojang to operate as they currently are. To support this, you referenced comments made by people who are not connected with such an alleged agreement in any way, and show no evidence whatsoever.

    Your "proof" is completely based on hearsay from unreliable, unconnected, and completely speculative sources. This is better known as "having no proof".
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Mojang Announcement: EULA, and Servers
    Quote from BestMinerGavin

    If this stuff isn't fixed, I may go ahead and start a simple sandbox voxel game similar to Minecraft, but with cooler stuff, maybe more realism and ALL for the community.

    So do it. Stop whining and do it.

    Good luck paying for your bills while you do everything for "the community" instead of yourself.

    You aren't going to do anything at all though. You're making an empty threat, one that you do not even have the tenacity to demonstrate directly to the company that you allege is harming you in some way. You have no plan and you're just throwing a temper tantrum.

    You want to show Mojang who's boss? Do it. Go hire a team of lawyers, go over to Sweden. and sue Mojang. You'll win. With a clear-cut case like you have, I'm sure of it.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Mojang Announcement: EULA, and Servers
    Quote from xilefian

    Those who are discussing the "fairness" problem;
    That should not even be Mojang's concern, they are private servers, not Mojang servers, key-word is private.

    They should be allowed to do what they want, it's their own resources that keeps their server running, if you think it's unfair then don't play on the server.

    This is one of the first rules of the internet kids used to learn back in the Quake 1 and IRC days; The internet is not a democracy, when you are on a server you are sitting on the operator's personal, private property, respect their rules and take up your problems with them directly, if you don't want to pay to be able to place blocks then don't join the server, their service is obviously wrong for you.

    By Mojang deciding (for some MASSIVELY insane reason) that making the internet a fair place is now their problem they are destroying a model of the internet that existed before online real-time games were even thought possible, not to mention that they are now pulling some of the responsibility of keeping players using private servers onto their own shoulders (Which they will do zero to act on, afterall they have Realms to worry about).


    This is a rushed, poorly thought-out decision made from the beliefs of the individuals at Mojang and it's getting majority support because the majority of Minecrafters are not server operators and have no interest in the broader ecosystem of the internet at all so want whatever benefits them most (Which is fairness).

    The internet is NOT a fair place, while I'm not going to defend the idea of "Charging players to be able to talk/place blocks/used a sword" I will certainly defend the right for server operators to decide how players interact with THEIR PROPERTY AND RESOURCES and I will NEVER support Mojang's decision to try and leverage a EULA agreement to control private server operations.


    This is my thoughts as a game engine programmer, gamer and someone who studied internet technology and history as to why these models exist in the first place.


    You missed one critical key point of the issue: it isn't the server owners' property. The product belongs exclusively to Mojang. Server owners chose to breach the license agreement.

    There is no debate to legality.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Mojang Announcement: EULA, and Servers
    Quote from Marcus101RR

    This is an interesting subject, but, we all know minecraft games alike have done this many times. What will they do to enforce this rule? Shut down your server? Can they even find out who runs/owns it?

    1. I have run a server under an alias with fake information before, and even on a private machine, which means they wouldn't be able to contact the host, because the host would be me, and the email would be unresponsive.

    2. How I run a server, what ranks/tiers are payed for, or content I decide to run via plugins is non of their business...

    Sounds to be like a fail by mojang to be honest. You cannot control how servers are being run...

    I would love to see the reactions and discussions on this matter, this is sure to fail. I can't see anything bad happening if someone ignores these rules...

    *ignores them*


    You've never been involved in litigation before.

    It is pretty simply: ignore the summons on the lawsuit, don't show up, and you lose.

    IP addresses are easy enough to track. In the event that a service provider covers it up, the litigant goes after the provider. If they resist attempts, namely covering up for you, they can and would be sued successfully, as well as any pending criminal charges for abetting and otherwise contributing to unlawful activity. This generally doesn't happen, as most providers are not willing to go to prison or pay fines and restitution to "cover your back".

    It all depends on if they (Mojang) chooses to pay attention to you or not.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Petition: Mojang needs to change the EULA!
    Dear members of the Minecraft Forums,

    Since Mojang changed the EULA, we're forced to accept their EULA before running a server.


    To start with, you're lying. Nobody forced you to accept the license agreement. You did that of your own will.

    The most important rule is:
    "You're not allowed to earn money in any way with Minecraft". This doesn't make any sense at all and it also destroys the community.


    It makes plenty of sense. Despite being put into simple terms so that you could understand it, the context still evades you. They wrote that passage in as few words possible. What part of "You're not allowed to earn money in any way with Minecraft" is hard to comprehend?

    Let me explain that last thing:
    Server owners will stop running servers because they're not allowed to earn money with it,


    Do you mean like all the pirate World of Warcraft servers, the still-active Quake servers, or all the other servers accessible over the Internet that don't make money at all? By the way, the Minecraft servers that charge for services have been doing so illegally from the beginning. Also, "donations" to pay for features aren't donations, they are a method of tax evasion, a felony.

    so they can't pay the bills and developers.

    Sure, they can. They can pay for their bills just like anyone else.

    Minecraft artists, who make parodys, drawings and more, aren't allowed to sell their work as it's using Minecrafts content.

    Make up your mind. If the person makes a parody or a drawing or anything else of that nature, they own the copyright to said material. If they're using Mojang's content, then the distributed software is Mojang's, not the "artist's". Regarding video content, that is the copyright of the creator of the footage, not the source for the material (with certain exceptions regarding content). If you take a video of your friends at Disneyland, Disney doesn't own the video, does it?

    Mojang has to change this, or it'll destroy the game and its community.

    Mojang doesn't have to do anything. Stopping people from selling their program doesn't "destroy" their program. If by "community" you mean people who pirate or make illegal use of Mojang's software, then yes. And so what? Perhaps they shouldn't have done it in the first place.

    Minecraft 1.7.10 update forces you to accept the EULA: http://www.reddit.co...before_you_can/

    Wrong. Nobody forced me to do anything. Do you have some knowledge of law or are you just making this up as you go along?

    Grum (Mojangsta) said the following: http://www.reddit.co...you_can/chzvg68)

    Don't care.

    Help us, and stop Mojang destroying the community.
    Support and share your love by sharing this petition.
    https://www.change.o...hange-your-eula [...]Regards, Bjarn


    No. Like any other movement from Change.org, you rely of bullying tactics to usurp the rights of others for your own personal gain. "You have something I want, so you HAVE TO GIVE IT TO ME!" is the moniker of choice. A company created software that you chose to buy. Other people decided to take it and attempt to make money from other's work and are now being told to stop. In response, several parties decided to perform as DDOS attack on the company's servers (which is a crime). Now there is a "petition" to force the creators and owners of the product to relinquish their authority of the policies of their own property.

    And then people, such as yourself, declare that your rights have been somehow infringed upon. You're in a class all your own, mate.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on New Biome
    *facepalm*

    Do you in all honesty think the term, "Biome" came into being to facilitate developing Minecraft?
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 1

    posted a message on Will the world ever accept the human body
    Quote from Tucan
    lol okme having a different opinion = i'm a rapistalright thenBasically you're arguing on not what I actually said, but what you wanted me to say?So according to you I'm:
    • defending rape
    • a rapist
    She [He] is arguing based on precisely what you said.Regarding the following:
    • defending rape - it certainly appears so
    • a rapist - that remains to be seen
    Posted in: Politics, Philosophy, News and Science
  • To post a comment, please .