Minecraft Forums

I see two pages ago it was mentioned that other shaders used through optifine aren't compatible. However I've found a post on github where a user claims to have gotten things working by setting his shader to only operate in world0. link

Does anyone here have any experience setting a shader to only work in the overworld? I cannot for the life of me find the shaders.properties file.

Quote from Collin1971»

Unfortunately, there's no config to change how the tabs work. Mod compatibility is certainly on the to do for future 1.8+ versions, however!

That's a long ways off given that devs are still arguing with Lex over the new rendering system. Mix that with Aether's long development periods, and there's basically no hope. Basic compatibly really needs to be taken more seriously then extra features. Your user base will jump significantly, once the FTB community is able to legitimately consider adding Aether to modpacks. Galacticraft and Tinkers Construct were able to figure out how to prevent their gui tabs from conflicting without delay to their own projects.

Even if run standalone, there really isn't any reason why Aether can't provide more config options. If compatibility isn't going to be worked on, just let users disable Aether's features that won't play nice. Aether is amazing, but dropping 50 mods that play nice, for one that lacks even configs is tough package to sell.

Is it possible to unlock slots on a player by player bases using something other then exp? Like say, finding a special item in a chest or quest?

I seem to get this crash

http://openeye.openmods.info/crashes/439d2ce1af03f8677aae7f8514c56448

Actually its been available North America (Canada) for quite some time. In fact, last I checked Canadians hold more of the continent then you.

Quote from Zegreiart

Most of the longwinded BS that you just spewed isn't even worth replying to. However, this little gem right here really sent my sides into orbit.



Right, DRM is caring about your users and their "safety". Safety from what? You? Because if you did, your mod (and a few others) wouldn't have DRM in the first place.

Please explain to me how that's caring.

Edit: Added in the sentence before that to the quote. I'd really like a source as proof of these less reputable elements and how they have taken advantage of users. Frankly, it just sounds like you're trying to justify your (terrible) actions by looking high and mighty.

The problem is kids like you who refuse to understand how things work. You hear "DRM" and instantly flip without considering its purpose. Railcraft DRM didnt limit users abilities to download or make backups of their files. Railcraft drm simply tried to protect the integrity of the file.

Quote from mDiyo

Just as a heads up, here's what "You won't be able to use TConstruct and GregTech together in 1.7" really means.

You can still use them together if you really, really, really want. This will pop up every time you start the game.

PsionicArchon: We have an alternative involving tesseracts on tools planned. ^^;;

ohad: Put things in the Smeltery while it has a bit of fluid in it.

AndaleTheGreat: Touhou dolls? There's a working config in the Magic Maiden modpack, but you might be better off just getting the config itself. It supports both TConstruct and Natura.

I'm still toying with the idea of adding the mod to the pack. Do I want the easy quarrying and tree harvesting or is that too much? The dolls would perfectly complement the maids...

With all due respect, as that message currently stands it is simply a smear campaign forced on all users every time they want to play their game. We get it, you hate Greg, but for our communities sake just stop.

Any chance on adding more config options? Such as allowing us to set how many items looters/pvp victors can take? Or whether all player can fully access all graves? More config options would make this much more appealing to a pvp server.

I feel sorry for everyone who went to minecon. Questions at the panels were nothing but 5 year olds shouting worthlessness.

Some questions asked at this years Minecon

WHAT HAPPENEd to mY Ahhh MY WORLD agh REDPOAWER
- A child at the modding panel

I'm a mother, and I don't know anything about minecraft but I'm curious how your mothers helped you.
-Some boy's mother

What does the word "mod" stand for?
-little boy


-little boy


-little boy

Do you like the portal gun mod?
-little boy

Do you want to join my fathers server?
-Some oddly dressed woman at notch


Is this really what the community has become ?

Quote from micdoodle8

Nope, but who uses purely cosmetic mods anyway?

I and quite a few other players, do infact care about cosmetic mods. Animated player alone has 126 pages on these forums; In compassion this mod has 88. Please understand that I'm not trying to compare userbases, only bring to your attention that players, very much so, like player customization. Given that Galacticraft offers no alternatives please consider adding support. I'm not requesting you change anything in regards to how gameplay functions within your mod. Only that you expand compatibility.

A very minor point, but do you think you could make the downloads on the site have a version number in the file name? I like to easily see what version something is when I'm looking through my mod folder, and it also helps prevent excessive downloads when, for instance, the Aether II mod updates, but the Gilded Games Util doesn't update. I could see "Oh, the util is still in version 1.1, but the mod updated to 1.3" without having to load it up in MultiMC.

I appreciate the work being done on the mod. I remember when the original Aether mod came out. I was still a noob at modding them, and I never manged to get it to work, but I'm excited to see a revival of a project I greatly looked forward to back then.

EDIT: It appears that the Util actually did update, but that the version number just wasn't updated with it. In any case, it would be a big help if the files could have version numbers in the name.

FYI, everybody, I'm waiting for Forge to release a recommended build of 1.7.2/1.7.4 before I update my mod.

Quote from mDiyo

I hope this is better. It should only pop up once.


Yes, I can get angry and be immature sometimes. I don't like it when others trounce on my beliefs.

Seriously, man you just don't get it. The answer to these problems is respect. You don't have to like him, or his mod, or support him. But don't be disrespectful. Be the bigger man, be what you want him to be, treat him how you want to be treated.

Would you like a message jumping up calling you a negative influence. If not remove that line.

add underground ruins made of unbreakable blocks, the only access point being a door which needs to be unlocked via some kind of magic. Add new hostiles that can only spawn in darkness on the floor blocks inside of those places. Also inside would be a random selection of various blocks and stuff in your mod possibly in a broken unusable form which can be reverse engineered using magic somehow to learn how to craft them yourself. There'd be many different types of ruin, large and small, underground and above, some more rare and difficult to access than others. Oh and add a guidebook somewhat like the Thauminomicon because looking up info on a wiki instead of just playing is annoying. In the Ars magica case, id say it would be better if each page of the book needed to be earned somehow.

Well, I only dabbled with Ars magica so I cant give a lot of specific feedback as to what mechanics should be changed. I did not stick with the mod for long due to various reasons namely too much world gen. But one of the things that interested me about it in the first place was that it gave you a reason to explore and fight. Most big mods dont do that so when you talk about replacing it with analyzing items (which is exactly what thaumcraft already does) then I become sad. Id rather ars magica be different from the rest. Instead of research or whatever you want to call it, why cant we just get most of the materials we need from mob drops and dungeons?

Speaking of dungeons, the things in the first one were way overdone and obvious. Perhaps you could look into formivores structure generator mod which does a better job at generating structures in a logical way than any other Ive tried. The underground city is especially interesting. One thing that seems to suit minecraft well and has hardly ever been touched on is archeology.

Its really cool how the tech mods out there interact with one another like one big happy family and is almost the only reason I use tech mods at all. Id definitely like to see more of that attitude coming from the magic and adventure side of things.

Would you be willing to work with weatherpony on compatability with the seasons mod for Natura?