@I_Can_Haz
That's odd? You using MCPatcher or Optifine? What version?
@Guekema
I really want to do portal animations and have made 3 or 4 attempts throughout the life of this pack, including converting lava animation. None have stuck. At some point it will happen, though. Just not sure when.
@HeRorikGaming
I must admit that I don't really know how server texture packs work. Assuming from your comment, you are wanting a URL that links directly to the zip file? I'm not sure I can provide this as it would require me to get hosting. I would humbly suggest that server owners host it somewhere themselves. The pack is Creative Commons now which means that people are free to rehost the pack in it's entirety.
I did test OptiFine and, as I suspected, it doesn't support all the CTM functionality that MCPatcher does. The result is that sandstone blocks look slightly worse now.
Do the jungle planks do anything with CTM? I use vertical planks akin to the previous Isabella ones and I wanted to know how to get rid of the CTM on the jungle planks since it doesn't seem to do anything.
Yes. The effect is very subtle. You can go in and replace the horizontal planks with the vertical planks in "ctm/ctm-wood1.png" or you can go through and delete the ctmblockXX.properties. You'll have to open each one and see which affect the jungle planks.
Dear god your joking. Coulda you said I shoulda waited till 1.3v2 came out?!?!?! -Sigh- I have to wait till tomorrow to update~
I did say I was working on a new update in the post right above the one where you stated you didn't like the new version. As a rule of thumb, you can always assume that there will be a new update coming out right around the corner.
If you plan to update your version of the Isabella Classic, you may also want to take a look at the leaves textures and adjust the foliage gradients to match the old version.
@Vira
I don't mind you asking. I just don't have the answers.
@Montpelier
I'm mostly concerned because some of the CTM stuff I did for the next version of the pack isn't supported by the last version of OptiFine. I'm hoping that it will be fixed when OptiFine gets updated for 1.3. But if it doesn't I need to decide to:
A ) Ignore OptiFine
B )Create an OptiFine version of the pack.
C ) Just ditch the non-universal features altogether.
@badjman
Got the link and will update the OP post soon.
@Conker
Isn't OptiFine supposed to improve performance on bad computers? Either way, still focusing on MCPatcher as my gold standard. I just wanted to see how much effort to put into making it OptiFine compatible too.
@Vira
What's your better grass setting? Fancy or fast?
Either way, I'm not exactly the best person to ask for modding help.
Also,
I have added a poll to the OP to find out if people prefer OptiFine or MCPatcher.
And, with the new TP distribution system for servers, it might be fun to have a list in the OP of servers that use Isabella II, Isabella Classic, or any derivatives. So let me know.
Yah, just the terrain. I also didn't touch the snow bits or the breaking animation.
As for hosting...
I'd like to be able to point people towards an updated Isabella Classic by linking it. This could either be a link to a mediafire (or whatever host you choose) or to a forum post. If you think you are going to update it a lot (more then once a week), I'd prefer you create your own thread or figure out someway so I don't have to constantly update my post.
The customizer issue is a bit complicated because last I checked it didn't support a lot of features that I have come to rely on for the design of the pack that are features in OptiFine or MCPatcher. So we'll have to wait and see if and how that site gets updated.
0
That's odd? You using MCPatcher or Optifine? What version?
@Guekema
I really want to do portal animations and have made 3 or 4 attempts throughout the life of this pack, including converting lava animation. None have stuck. At some point it will happen, though. Just not sure when.
@HeRorikGaming
I must admit that I don't really know how server texture packs work. Assuming from your comment, you are wanting a URL that links directly to the zip file? I'm not sure I can provide this as it would require me to get hosting. I would humbly suggest that server owners host it somewhere themselves. The pack is Creative Commons now which means that people are free to rehost the pack in it's entirety.
0
This next content update is going to be interesting.
Especially with the mob changes. I'm going to have to sit down and really rethink my mob and armor designs.
0
Thanks
0
Speaking of the OP.
I have updated the Mod Support section with:
0
I'll need a little more time to respond to it properly. But for now I'll just say that I think I'll try you darker ocean suggestion.
0
0
I did test OptiFine and, as I suspected, it doesn't support all the CTM functionality that MCPatcher does. The result is that sandstone blocks look slightly worse now.
0
Yes. The effect is very subtle. You can go in and replace the horizontal planks with the vertical planks in "ctm/ctm-wood1.png" or you can go through and delete the ctmblockXX.properties. You'll have to open each one and see which affect the jungle planks.
I did say I was working on a new update in the post right above the one where you stated you didn't like the new version. As a rule of thumb, you can always assume that there will be a new update coming out right around the corner.
If you plan to update your version of the Isabella Classic, you may also want to take a look at the leaves textures and adjust the foliage gradients to match the old version.
0
New version of Isabella II (1.3v2) is available in OP.
0
I don't mind you asking. I just don't have the answers.
@Montpelier
I'm mostly concerned because some of the CTM stuff I did for the next version of the pack isn't supported by the last version of OptiFine. I'm hoping that it will be fixed when OptiFine gets updated for 1.3. But if it doesn't I need to decide to:
A ) Ignore OptiFine
B )Create an OptiFine version of the pack.
C ) Just ditch the non-universal features altogether.
0
Got the link and will update the OP post soon.
@Conker
Isn't OptiFine supposed to improve performance on bad computers? Either way, still focusing on MCPatcher as my gold standard. I just wanted to see how much effort to put into making it OptiFine compatible too.
@Vira
What's your better grass setting? Fancy or fast?
Either way, I'm not exactly the best person to ask for modding help.
0
I have added a poll to the OP to find out if people prefer OptiFine or MCPatcher.
And, with the new TP distribution system for servers, it might be fun to have a list in the OP of servers that use Isabella II, Isabella Classic, or any derivatives. So let me know.
0
As for hosting...
I'd like to be able to point people towards an updated Isabella Classic by linking it. This could either be a link to a mediafire (or whatever host you choose) or to a forum post. If you think you are going to update it a lot (more then once a week), I'd prefer you create your own thread or figure out someway so I don't have to constantly update my post.
0
0