Back in 1.8 beta, I was running through a desert, away from a spider. I ended up jumping off a cliff, and landing on a cactus. I did survive the fall, but not enough to get off the cactus.
Clay can be a pain to collect in large amounts, and to use as a practical building block. My idea is to add another source of clay that isn't too OP: Rough clay.
Rough clay would spawn commonly in the dirt layer, under deserts, and on the surface in mesas. Rough clay would be light brown, and smooth, and spawn in chunks of 4 to 10. Each block would drop 1-3 rough clay balls. Smelting them would yield a single brick, and crafting 4 rough clay balls will give a rough clay block. Rough clay blocks can be turned into normal clay by crafting it with a water bucket. Thoughts?
To me, the three new stone types are great looking blocks, and I enjoy building with them. The only problem is, they just feel unfinished. The developers just threw them in on one snapshot, and gave them each one recipe, which makes smooth variants. The polished diorite isn't that smooth compared to the other smooth variants. Where's the stairs and slabs?
Also, it confuses me why there are recipes used to convert one stone type to another. I just don't understand why, it feels like Mojang wants to discourage mining.
The Superflat customization screen has been left unfinished for a long time. It would be nice if they added an interface for easy customization. Here's my ideas.
First, there should be a block layer screen. There would be two lists, one on the left, and right. The left list would list all the blocks. Variations of blocks with the same ID will be included, unless they are technical blocks. The list on the right would be what blocks are going to generate in the world. You can scroll through the left list of blocks, and click-and-drag them over to the right. You can also click and drag blocks between layers, so you don't have to start over if you forget something. When you move blocks to the right, there would be a number beside them, which shows how many of that block wll generate in a layer. Of course, you can change it to your liking.
There would be another screen that has biome/generation options. You can choose which structures you want to generate in your world, such as villages, strongholds, and others. It would be a drop-down list, with about every structure listed. Each one would have an empty box, which you can check if you want the structure to generate. Then, there should be a biome options list. It would work the same as the previous one, but you cannot uncheck anything if there's only one biome checked. This prevents the user trying to make 'no' biomes generate. At the top of the list would be an 'all biomes' option, which does what it says.
Lastly, there would be a miscellaneous options list, which allows you to toggle caves, decorations, water/lava lakes, etc.
That's it for my suggestions, please tell me what you think.
No, this is bad. There are so many people who use iron tools, even if they have chests filled with diamonds. If all of your iron equipment changed into rust instantly, that would cause a whole lot of problems. What if you accidentally dipped your feet into water for a split second? Then everything would be rusted. What if someone pours a bucket of water on a building made of iron? Then the whole building could be griefed very quickly, and be a pain to clean up.
I don't understand why so many people are against new ores. For a game called Minecraft, there's not enough ores for mining. If copper is added, iron would need to be more valuable, so people would stick to it, rather than ignoring it in favor of copper. Maybe iron equipment could be buffed, and lots of the copper items should be removed, to keep iron unique. I like the copper rails, tools/armor, and the pressure plate.
I would probably do a bunch of small, but nice things. I would change the textures of the Acacia and Dark Oak leaves to be unique, I would put in Granite/Diorite/Andesite stairs, and slabs, and add beetroot to the PC edition. I could come up with a whole list, but I'm not gonna make you read for an hour.
I'd be upset, and take a break from the game for a few minutes. Afterwards, i'll go back to the world and gather the resources I need to replace my lost items.
I am 14 years old, 15 in two weeks. It's nice to see that adults play Minecraft, it adds diversity to the community. I may be a bit young, but that doesn't mean I am immature.
Minecraft isn't a "kid's type game", it's a game for all ages. Sure, most of the people who play it tend to be younger, but that doesn't mean adults can't play it. Also, there is absolutely nothing wrong with this thread. Nobody is upset about how many kids play Minecraft, this is just a thread to see how many older people play the game. And yes, you were raging, calling others "petty old people," and saying that they have "old feelings."
If the villagers dropped what they are selling, that would defeat the purpose of trading. People would just kill the villagers, instead of trading with them. No support.
Interesting idea. The chances for spawning fish should be way lower, because someone could put 30 blocks of TNT and get a stack of free fish. Also, would it also bring up the treasure and junk items from fishing too?
No support. Capes are supposed to be unique, and extremely rare for special players. If this gets added, people won't look twice when they see a cape on a server.
Time, Y U NO GO FASTER!? I want this snapshot out now, because I have a chest filled with seven near broken diamond pickaxes. I like to save them, just like I did with my first pickaxe (wooden).
0
0
Rough clay would spawn commonly in the dirt layer, under deserts, and on the surface in mesas. Rough clay would be light brown, and smooth, and spawn in chunks of 4 to 10. Each block would drop 1-3 rough clay balls. Smelting them would yield a single brick, and crafting 4 rough clay balls will give a rough clay block. Rough clay blocks can be turned into normal clay by crafting it with a water bucket. Thoughts?
0
0
Also, it confuses me why there are recipes used to convert one stone type to another. I just don't understand why, it feels like Mojang wants to discourage mining.
What do you think about the new stone types?
0
First, there should be a block layer screen. There would be two lists, one on the left, and right. The left list would list all the blocks. Variations of blocks with the same ID will be included, unless they are technical blocks. The list on the right would be what blocks are going to generate in the world. You can scroll through the left list of blocks, and click-and-drag them over to the right. You can also click and drag blocks between layers, so you don't have to start over if you forget something. When you move blocks to the right, there would be a number beside them, which shows how many of that block wll generate in a layer. Of course, you can change it to your liking.
There would be another screen that has biome/generation options. You can choose which structures you want to generate in your world, such as villages, strongholds, and others. It would be a drop-down list, with about every structure listed. Each one would have an empty box, which you can check if you want the structure to generate. Then, there should be a biome options list. It would work the same as the previous one, but you cannot uncheck anything if there's only one biome checked. This prevents the user trying to make 'no' biomes generate. At the top of the list would be an 'all biomes' option, which does what it says.
Lastly, there would be a miscellaneous options list, which allows you to toggle caves, decorations, water/lava lakes, etc.
That's it for my suggestions, please tell me what you think.
0
No support.
0
0
0
Half-support.
0
0
2
Minecraft isn't a "kid's type game", it's a game for all ages. Sure, most of the people who play it tend to be younger, but that doesn't mean adults can't play it. Also, there is absolutely nothing wrong with this thread. Nobody is upset about how many kids play Minecraft, this is just a thread to see how many older people play the game. And yes, you were raging, calling others "petty old people," and saying that they have "old feelings."
0
1
0