• 1

    posted a message on Did the Terrain Become BORING? (UPDATE 6/5/13 - 1.7 is a biome update?)
    Quote from vasouv

    Hey I guess you don't need those seeds I had sent you :P How are you liking the terrain changes in the snapshots?



    The changes are awesome, if I had time I would have started a new world the day the snapshots came out.

    The only huge things for me are better caves and more tree types, then I won't be able to stay away from this game.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Did the Terrain Become BORING? (UPDATE 6/5/13 - 1.7 is a biome update?)
    Just poking around youtube looking for some analysis on that biome overview pic,

    Edit: Skip to 4:50, copying url at current time doesn't work on the forums.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Did the Terrain Become BORING? (UPDATE 6/5/13 - 1.7 is a biome update?)
    Quote from QWERTY_Dog17

    I wish we still have good posts like this one. Now we just have pointless arguments with the famous Dextrous and friends.


    Not always, you just came at a bad time, if it isn't over already it will be within the last few days.

    It would be great if people could continue those in PMs cause I don't think anyone cares.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Did the Terrain Become BORING? (UPDATE 6/5/13 - 1.7 is a biome update?)
    Quote from wassupbro

    Guys, its not like that cliff is a finished product. He still may be working on steepening them. Is that even a word


    Add it to your spell check dictionary and I'm pretty sure anything is a word. But with the cliffs, hey, we may get lucky and they generate in different shapes and types, super steep, overhang, etc.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Did the Terrain Become BORING? (UPDATE 6/5/13 - 1.7 is a biome update?)
    Quote from Meeparoo

    It could get boring, but I guess it depends what you're doing.. New biomes couldn't do anything but help the situation though, more things to do, more things to explore, MORE FUN


    Something some people won't understand. I like some of the new biomes and the game did need new ones, but the current ones still need to be improved.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Did the Terrain Become BORING? (UPDATE 6/5/13 - 1.7 is a biome update?)
    Did any of you forget that this is all work in progress stuff?
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Minecraft isn't dying, just changing in a bad way.
    Quote from 63854

    Every company is money hungry. Some companies just do it in bad days.



    Implying that:
    1. Companies do not care about the quality of their product.
    2. They also do not care about how satisfied the customer is, only that they get a profit.

    Sure companies need money to function, everyone needs money to function. But just because they need money doesn't mean the are going out of their way to make it.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 16

    posted a message on Minecraft isn't dying, just changing in a bad way.
    Oh my god, another one. At this rate the forum is gonna need another section just for complaining.


    Quote from 63854

    Many people either say Minecraft is dying or is still going strong. Both are true.
    That is an opinion, I accept it but respectfully disagree.
    This generation of Minecraft fans IS dying.
    Not really. I know atleast 50 people from alpha and even infdev that are still playing and still love the game.
    But younger fans are joining.
    Younger people have always played this game, that is invalid.
    What people have to realize is that Mojang is a company. Companies have to make money.
    So your insisting that the changes are based on Mojang being a money hungry company?
    I know Alpha and Beta players are complaining how Minecraft isn't what it used to be. They're right. Mojang knows it won't get another dollar, pound, or Euro from anyone who's already purchased Minecraft. So Mojang made way for the next generation.
    Not really. Have you ever considered that it is in fact their game and they can do what they want? People also have can have multiple accounts you know.
    Once every little sister or brother saw their older sibling play Minecraft, they wanted to be just like them and buy the game. So they did, and guess what, they got mauled by creepers, zombies, and hunger.
    Does that really matter? They play, they can get owned by mobs, or they can play on peaceful.
    So Mojang made the game easier. And it worked.
    Cough-cough look at the recent change logs for hostile mobs.
    What little 7-year old girl wouldn't just buy Minecraft because of horses? So what if horses ruin the game of survival Minecraft?, 7-year olds have shorter attention spans.
    So they added horses because they wanted little girls to buy the game (horses are one feature). Not because other people actually wanted them?
    The point is, Mojang knows that it is ruining Minecraft in exchange money from it's younger fans.
    Again, an overly cynical view of a great indie game company. Wow.


    Responses are Bolded.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on May be excessive realism, but here's my idea
    Yeah, its such a small thing I don't think it needs changing.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 5

    posted a message on What is a good cheap windows 8 computer for playing Minecraft ?
    Tip No.1 Don't get anything with windows 8.
    Posted in: Hardware & Software Support
  • To post a comment, please .