• 5

    posted a message on Minecraft has not really changed....
    I've been seeing a lot of complaints lately that Minecraft is leaning away from its original style, one good example is there is now an ending screen (which does not really end the game)
    In reality, it hasn't changed at all. I can't stand all the people who are saying "OH MY GOD NOTCH FREAKING IDIOT YOU'RE RUINING THE GAME BLAHGSHLDGSHG"
    Literally everything in Minecraft is optional....
    You don't have to mine diamonds
    You don't have to fight monsters
    You don't have to do anything.

    Minecraft is still what you want it to be. You don't have to go beat the Ender Dragon and get the ending screen that does not really end the game. All this new stuff is completely optional, you won't ever see it unless you choose to do so. What really gets me is the people who say it was better in Alpha. If Minecraft stayed in alpha forever, it would quickly die down and lose its popularity. Minecraft is a game that relies largely on being consistently updated and changed. It wouldn't surprise me if the game died soon after the moment Mojang stops updating it. (Hopefully that won't happen soon)

    Anyways, I've gotten myself off topic. What I'm trying to say is complaining about the game changing too much isn't going to help anybody. Isn't the game actually getting closer to what was originally intended anyways? It would seem a lot of 1.9 stuff had actually been planned long ago by Notch, no?
    Posted in: 1.0 Update Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Instant Mush-Room!
    What if you grow two red mushroom trees together and combine them?
    Posted in: 1.8 Update Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Can't find any villages in 1.8 survival world?
    I had the same problem too.
    Eventually I generated a new world that had an NPC village nearby the spawn.
    Posted in: 1.8 Update Discussion
  • To post a comment, please .