This suggestion is a wishlist. Please post only one idea, or for larger suggestions a few ideas which are intertwined. This will allow members to find topics to discuss more easily.
This suggestion is vague. Please add more detail into the topic so members will be able to discuss the suggestion more easily.
This suggestion is a wishlist. Please post only one idea, or for larger suggestions a few ideas which are intertwined. This will allow members to find topics to discuss more easily.
We can do exactly what VC said, but we also have access to a special "staff-only" section of the forum, a private IRC channel, expanded signature capabilities, and the ability to invite more people to a PM then the standard limit. Other then that, outside of the section we moderate, we are standard users.
They can edit/hide/delete threads/posts, lock threads, move threads, issue infractions. This is only in the sections they are moderating, however. They are essentially normal users in every section but the one(s) they moderate.
Small correction: sectional moderators have an option to hide their own posts outside of their section (so I could post something in Mapping and Modding and hide it later*/**)
*I don't know why I'd need that
**It might be a bug
Should we get a message in our inbox stating our Declination or Acceptance; or should we continually check the Mod Application section for an update on our status?
You will get a message about that. I actually have my application marked as denied still: sometimes something doesn't work but regardless it was accepted. You will get a PM first.
I added it to the main post, giving you credits. I tought about a command that might be easy to understand, remember and write but id like you to check on it and maybe if you can write an example using the command to add it to the post if you dont mind.
Thanks =) I think it will give something else to use on custom maps, another little tool to improve mapmaking IMHO
What about having the mob name be replaced with mobname{datatags}, for example /mobloot remove MobNameHere{DataOfMobHere} minecraft:DropToBeRemoved? That way all the commands stay essentially the same, but the mobs can be suffixed with data parameters for more specific conditions.
With that syntax, here's an example of how to make a "horseback" zombie with certain drops:
Yeah, like I said above, I think something like that would be better. But it would have to be boss:1, because NBT structures don't support Boolean values.
Ah. Thanks for the clarification, I never knew that NBT doesn't support them...
So its helps you to keep track of your moderator applications if you have more than one?
Really, there should only be one pending application per applicant. However, the title is mostly just used as a header at the top of the application and isn't considered (unless there's something bad in it.) On the main application processing screen, it doesn't show the title of the application, only the forum name of the member. Read more about the processing here: http://www.minecraftforum.net/topic/1422941-applying-to-be-a-moderator/page__st__1840__p__18825954#entry18825954
This is a very interesting feature. If I recall correctly, there was a way to make minecarts invisible as well. If that is true, it might be possible to have a sphere with an opening without the obvious mass of minecarts.
Will be interested to see if this is used in other maps, perhaps by the creator of the Code. The final destruction sphere shown in this video showed obvious similarity to Code III's ending,
0
I love the detailing in everything, especially the castle walls. They have real depth, not plain flatness.
On a side note: how did you make the island's landscaping and underside? Those are perfectly roughened.
0
Read the rules at rules.mcf.li Thank you.
0
This suggestion is vague. Please add more detail into the topic so members will be able to discuss the suggestion more easily.
Read the rules at rules.mcf.li Thank you.
0
Locking at poster's request.
0
Read the rules at rules.mcf.li Thank you.
0
0
Read the rules at rules.mcf.li Thank you.
0
0
Read the rules at rules.mcf.li Thank you.
0
In 1.8 (doable in 1.7 but required in 1.8) item IDs are no longer numbers but are words. For example, in 1.7 or below, to give sand:
In 1.8 it must be done as such:
0
They can edit/hide/delete threads/posts, lock threads, move threads, issue infractions. This is only in the sections they are moderating, however. They are essentially normal users in every section but the one(s) they moderate.
Small correction: sectional moderators have an option to hide their own posts outside of their section (so I could post something in Mapping and Modding and hide it later*/**)
*I don't know why I'd need that
**It might be a bug
You will get a message about that. I actually have my application marked as denied still: sometimes something doesn't work but regardless it was accepted. You will get a PM first.
0
What about having the mob name be replaced with mobname{datatags}, for example /mobloot remove MobNameHere{DataOfMobHere} minecraft:DropToBeRemoved? That way all the commands stay essentially the same, but the mobs can be suffixed with data parameters for more specific conditions.
With that syntax, here's an example of how to make a "horseback" zombie with certain drops:
One further suggestion: what about /mobloot remove MobNameHere all to completely wipe a mob's drops?
0
Ah. Thanks for the clarification, I never knew that NBT doesn't support them...
1
0
Really, there should only be one pending application per applicant. However, the title is mostly just used as a header at the top of the application and isn't considered (unless there's something bad in it.) On the main application processing screen, it doesn't show the title of the application, only the forum name of the member. Read more about the processing here: http://www.minecraftforum.net/topic/1422941-applying-to-be-a-moderator/page__st__1840__p__18825954#entry18825954