Just an update. After submitting a DMCA request through Google, 9minecraft removed my resource pack from their website. So far it looks like DMCA requests actually work for removing content from websites.
Would there be a way to do this for all languages without having to edit each one individually? :/ Because this is kind of stupid if it's the only option. While it works, it reduces the usability of my resource pack for people who have set their minecraft to a differnt language setting.
I'm currently making a new rpg style gui for my resource pack. I want to make the text on the gui screen for the inventory, furnace and crafting table to be darker. Is there a way to do this easily?
See below where it says "Crafting" on the inventory screen. I want this text to be darker or lighter to match the style. See full size of image here.
Hey, I understand your frustration. There are tones of websites out there that monetize content they do not legally own. This has happened to me with my texture pack (and obviously to thousands of other people).
There is a solution to this though (as suggested by people already). Go to Google's dmca dashboard and click "create a new notice". Google will prevent the pages with the copyrighted material from appearing in search results.
I'm not completely sure of how the process works because when I filed a dmca notice though google the actual content was taken of the website as well. Alternatively you can send a dmca notice directly to the web host and you can get the content taken down that way.
Edit:
lol, turns out 9minecraft is hosting my content illegally. Time for a dmca notice...
I have been surprized in the past multiple times at the obvious-to-me loss of quality that other people have assured me would be "not noticiable".
If you compress an image too much you are obviously going to have a smaller file size with reduced quality. This program I used seems to work nicely though. I haven't seen any noticeable differences in quality with my compressed textures.
This program uses lossy compression to reduce file size. You will reduce the quality of the texture, but it will not be noticeable. I keep my original files uncompressed and only compress the files I release for download.
As for the statements I made earlier:
- Faster load time (based on observation): It look less time for Minecraft to load the resource pack.
- More FPS (theoretical): As the resource pack files are smaller, theoretically this would take up less system resources. However, because most resource packs take up hardly any space and they can be loaded quickly once in the RAM (like you said), the FPS increase would not be noticeable, and in most cases non-existent. I will remove the statement as it was incorrect.
naw, cant wait for 1.8 and its release date.
It already seems very intersting
The Endermen look very scary though
I definently cant wait till npc trading
Also Mojang needs to provide better base server software
0
Stone slabs have been re-textured. They are now sharper and smoother.
0
Firewolf v1.35 is out! 3D iron bars have been added.
0
Updated to v1.34!
Change log:
- added realistic rain sounds (so calm and peaceful)
- updated Terms of Use
- updated pack.mcmeta
1
Thanks ^^ Will do
0
Recently changed the style of the inventory and I need some feedback. Do you think it looks ok? Any suggestions for improvements?
Screenshot:
0
Just an update. After submitting a DMCA request through Google, 9minecraft removed my resource pack from their website. So far it looks like DMCA requests actually work for removing content from websites.
0
Would there be a way to do this for all languages without having to edit each one individually? :/ Because this is kind of stupid if it's the only option. While it works, it reduces the usability of my resource pack for people who have set their minecraft to a differnt language setting.
0
Thx, that works. ^^
0
I'm currently making a new rpg style gui for my resource pack. I want to make the text on the gui screen for the inventory, furnace and crafting table to be darker. Is there a way to do this easily?
See below where it says "Crafting" on the inventory screen. I want this text to be darker or lighter to match the style. See full size of image here.
0
Hey, I understand your frustration. There are tones of websites out there that monetize content they do not legally own. This has happened to me with my texture pack (and obviously to thousands of other people).
There is a solution to this though (as suggested by people already). Go to Google's dmca dashboard and click "create a new notice". Google will prevent the pages with the copyrighted material from appearing in search results.
I'm not completely sure of how the process works because when I filed a dmca notice though google the actual content was taken of the website as well. Alternatively you can send a dmca notice directly to the web host and you can get the content taken down that way.
Edit:
lol, turns out 9minecraft is hosting my content illegally. Time for a dmca notice...
0
I tested in on 128x and 512px.
0
Plank textures have been finished and red sand has been added!
0
If you compress an image too much you are obviously going to have a smaller file size with reduced quality. This program I used seems to work nicely though. I haven't seen any noticeable differences in quality with my compressed textures.
0
New Cobblestone texture! Nice, clean and smooth texture to make your builds look nice.
0
Hi Eleazzaar,
This program uses lossy compression to reduce file size. You will reduce the quality of the texture, but it will not be noticeable. I keep my original files uncompressed and only compress the files I release for download.
As for the statements I made earlier:
- Faster load time (based on observation): It look less time for Minecraft to load the resource pack.
- More FPS (theoretical): As the resource pack files are smaller, theoretically this would take up less system resources. However, because most resource packs take up hardly any space and they can be loaded quickly once in the RAM (like you said), the FPS increase would not be noticeable, and in most cases non-existent. I will remove the statement as it was incorrect.