Awesome work! Been using it a bit, my only crit so far is that the top of the crafting table looks a bit too much like generic wood. I often place crafting tables into the floor so it makes them a bit hard to see. Perhaps add some kind of 3x3 inset grid on the top or something?
Sorry if this has been asked before, but I'm super curious as to how you created/recorded the seamlessly repeating lava animation, since it was originally generated with code. (and didn't ever repeat, since it was based on random values)
I have old procedural textures implemented in my mod, and the new texture
system allows writing textures to files without much hassle.
So I literally recorded them, and then did some post-processing (tiling
flowing texture, adding transition, stitching) with ImageMagick.
Assuming the fifth texture is gravel, the sixth is bedrock, and the eleventh is cobble? Amazing work. I think it's kind of strange that all the grass goes in one direction though. Top grass has to be one of the hardest textures in the game to do. Definitely keep working on it.
The fifth is cobblestone, the eleventh is cobble bricks, a block I added to my server.
I did the minecraft logo. I'm not sure what I think of it. The original is petty strong-- obviously not Developer-art. Don't what to replace it with an inferior HD version.
What do you think?
I think the highlights aren't strong enough, but it looks pretty good overall.
Erm... do you realize there are 2 (possibly more) spots there that don't move and stick out painfully? One is on the left... it's small+sharp square and visible for a large portion of the animation. Also, is this for flowing lava, still, or both? I personally dislike 'flowing' still animations, I'd imagine many people do.
Thanks for the crit. I may fix it eventually, I was just really glad to be done with the animation as it was quite a drag to create.
As for the lava type, it's just "lava." There is no distinction between flowing or still lava in classic. It does mean that this animation gives a "drifting" effect, but I personally find it acceptable.
I do, It's not too much slower because I don't have many models or other more demanding resources but I still like testing and tampering in a smaller folder because I'd prefer constant refreshes to be as fast as possible and easy to access.
I have a little challenge for anyone who's up for it...
Make a tree using only 5 colours for both the log and leaves
How is denmark being griefed even news? It should come as no surprise that a server without any kind of grief protection that a lot of people visit will be defaced.
Hey, they have added new skin layouts for minecraft 1.8, so now is possible to have 2 layers...
But they could add 320x320 skins support! It would be AWESOME, the skins would be HD and so much possibilities!!
*Sorry for bad english
But yeah, 320x320 skins would be, in my opinion, one of the best things in this update!
I really do not like this idea. I feel like it just goes against the style of the game. I realize there are resource packs that go against the style of the game, but at least you choose to use those. With skins, people would just be waltzing around with HD-skins breaking the asthetic of the game. Also, 320x320 would be a terrible resolution, as it is not a power of 2 and therefore would not map very well onto the model.
Ugh. This is going to a absolutely awful. If you try and add a story to a game where one of the points is that it has no story, it's going to be terrible. Not looking forward to this one.
In my opinion it is actually better to base a movie off a game that does not have a story. Because the game has no story, the movie's story can be written purely to work as a film, instead of being bogged down by elements from the game that they try to stuff in.
This is a second "models". The first was "assets/minecraft/textures/models", this one is "assets/minecraft/models".
Oh, I see what you mean now.
I experimented around with it a bit, it seems to be an easier way to keep track of and add/change special block models. For example, by editing the tallgrass.json file I was able to make grass look like crops in shape.
Unfortunately it does not seem to work in resource packs.
the Number 1 decoration Block i have been dieing to have in Minecraft is to have chairs. I still can not believe that have not added them to the game yet. If this was in the game it would be great for machimina's and even MineTV.
0
Looks exciting so far, glad the dungeons have above-ground indicators.
9
Finished terrain.png for my 32x pack.
(Ignore fire and lava, they are animated separately)
0
Awesome work! Been using it a bit, my only crit so far is that the top of the crafting table looks a bit too much like generic wood. I often place crafting tables into the floor so it makes them a bit hard to see. Perhaps add some kind of 3x3 inset grid on the top or something?
0
Sorry if this has been asked before, but I'm super curious as to how you created/recorded the seamlessly repeating lava animation, since it was originally generated with code. (and didn't ever repeat, since it was based on random values)0
The fifth is cobblestone, the eleventh is cobble bricks, a block I added to my server.
18
Some 32x textures. Top grass is still a pain.
2
Is there a face in the bottom left block there?
1
I think the highlights aren't strong enough, but it looks pretty good overall.
10
Some simple textures I made for Classic(ube).
Pictures:
0
This is a local IP, we need the external IP if we are to join...
0
Thanks for the crit. I may fix it eventually, I was just really glad to be done with the animation as it was quite a drag to create.
As for the lava type, it's just "lava." There is no distinction between flowing or still lava in classic. It does mean that this animation gives a "drifting" effect, but I personally find it acceptable.
11
Some textures I made for ClassiCube:
8
3
Thank you for updating to 1.8! Although I have to ask, is there any way we can get the 1.8 hat layers to be 3D and an option for the thin arms?
I can't find any good previewers besides this one, and this one would be a dream come true if it just had those features.
1
I definitely agree with Seradicus. I might join if we can just focus on a few blocks and not be overwhelmed with all the blocks there are these days.
also we totally didn't conspire together for these comments