The graphics mention was just a brief example.
Anyway, while it is technically true that Minecraft 2 is not needed, you can say that for pretty much every other suggestion on this forum, so it's not really the most valid argument. And yes, if my ideas get implemented there is sense in a Minecraft sequel as you would otherwise have to completely rebalance and recode the game, and as previous updates taught us, such a major overhaul as an update is a bad idea.
This doesn't compare to normal suggestions. Adding a small thing to the game is not an entire sequel. There's no story, there's nothing to continue off of. Not really worth the time and money to pump out another sandbox sequel with meh changes here and there and have a whole 'nother game to keep updating.
But seriously, for the hopefully final time, can you guys please stop with the "We don't need a Minecraft 2" negativity? I explained in Part 1 that yes, you are right, but that I believe the game would only benefit from a good sequel. The whole reason I post these suggestions here is to get feedback on the suggestions themselves. Arguing about whether or not we should have a sequel misses the point.
Some of the things you suggested are not what makes minecraft likable. If you honestly think there's just benefits from an unneeded sequel, there is an entire line of thought that flew straight over you.