• 0

    posted a message on 1 biome worlds
    Quote from FireHawkDelta

    One biome worlds... sounds like a stereotypical planet. Whenever a planet has life, does it have be just an ocean? Desert? Jungle? I support this suggestion, but I just think it's stupid that on TV all planets have to be a single biome.

    Yeah that bothers me a bit too, but this is still a good idea.

    Quote from bontrose

    or village blacksmith chest

    Except that villages don't spawn on mushroom islands.

    I think this could work better if you could choose up to 3 biomes to combine (make a tropical world with jungles, swamps and oceans).
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Adding Bamboo to Minecraft
    It should spawn in a bamboo forest biome and should have bamboo leaf blocks.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Underground features as biome dependent.
    Great ideas, I also think there should be some aesthetic ones such as roots and vines underneath jungles or sandstone caves underneath deserts or maybe even ice caves.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Best ending on a game?
    I'm going to have to agree with everyone saying Portal 2, the whole idea of shooting the moon was really cool.

    I also liked Halo 3, and I'll probably get some hate for this, but Gears of War 3.
    Posted in: General Gaming
  • 0

    posted a message on The Official Gun Thread
    So what happened here exactly? Why is the original thread now inaccessible?
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Age of Minecraft
    In theory, this could work.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Favorite Armor/Clothing
    In no particular order.
    Spartan armour (Halo)
    Dremora churl armour (TES)
    Ezio's robes (Assassins Creed)
    Chaos power armour (Warhammer 40,000)
    Gear armour (Gears of War)
    Posted in: General Gaming
  • 0

    posted a message on Energy/ Plasma/ Magical Shielding/ Protection
    Could be interesting, but it would have to be very hard to obtain (Minecraft's easy enough as is).
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on The Official Gun Thread
    Quote from x still alive x

    can i take this for my thread?

    Sure.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Would you like climates to be a bit more sorted?
    I think this thread deserves more attention, bump.
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Mine entrance above ground would be a good idea
    Quote from MineFigure

    Agreed. What kind of idiot builds a mine with no entrance?

    Maybe that's why they're abandoned, the miners died because they forgot to build an exit.

    It was the architects idea-Family Guy.


    Anyway, I agree, there should be an entrance.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Lore and Myths
    Bump, sorry for double post.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 1

    posted a message on The Official Gun Thread
    I find it really annoying how everyone seems to say guns ruin minecraft, so is alist of reasons people say that, and why they are idiots.

    MINECRAFT IS A FANTASY GAME
    Err, so? Plenty of fantasies use primitive guns. Take Warhammer or Fable, plenty of guns, but they're still fantasy games. If anything guns make those sort of games seem more fantastical. Besides, if Steve can make advanced killing machines and super computers, then a simple arquebus or flintlock shouldn't be to hard. To prove my point, I'll make a list of fantasies that include guns AND show how loose the whole idea of fantasy is. Fable, Warhammer, Warhammer 40,000, Final Fantasy, Dungeons and Dragons, World of Warcraft, Star Wars, ect.

    MINECRAFT IS SET IN MEDIEVAL TIMES
    What's your point? There were guns in medieval times, there were guns before medieval times.
    Besides, Minecraft isn't set in medieval times anyway, it has electricity, TNT, jukeboxes, diamond tools, mine-carts, all things invented after medieval times.

    MINECRAFT IS SUPPOSED TO BE INNOCENT
    I've seen plenty of kids games that use modern weapons and just change the name or impact slightly to keep it innocent. Now read this scenario. During the day Steve gets hungry, so he horrifically slaughters an innocent animal and feeds on its carcass. He also kills sheep for his own private comfort. At night demons and creatures of the night come out of the ground to do the same to Steve. The next day Steve heads into a cave, kills all the wildlife living inside and takes apart the tunnels just to find precious gems. Later he travels to another dimension and kills people there (who never did anything except look at him) just to steal some gold. Then he goes to yet another dimension and kills an animal that's the last of it's kind just for bragging rights. How much of this sounds innocent to you?

    MINECRAFT IS A BUILDING GAME
    See above.

    GUNS WOULD BE OVERPOWERED
    I think this guy made it pretty clear that they wouldn't. Even if they were added Jeb would find ways to avoid having trigger-happy maniacs on SMP.

    MINECRAFT IS NOT AN FPS
    Minecraft is an fps, it's in first person, therefore it is.

    IT WOULD GIVE AN OPENING FOR NUKES/JETS/AK-47S
    We already have TNT, yet very few people ask for those things to be added.

    MINECRAFT JUST SHOULDN'T HAVE GUNS
    Okay, seriously!? if you say this then you're either a troll, were raised by a troll or a just really stupid.

    NOTCH SAID NO GUNS EVER
    He said no modern/futuristic guns ever, direct me to his post and i'll prove it. Besides, Notch's word no longer counts for anything, Jeb's in power now.

    still think minecraft shouldn't have guns? if yes, you're either a troll, were raised by a troll or are just really stupid.

    The only good reason not to have guns is because they're not really needed, for the moment Jeb should focus on more important things, but when the time comes guns would be a pretty cool addition.


    Quote from x still alive x

    i should note that the behavoiur of some of the haters who try to troll [for lack of a better word] this thread is so OTT and ridiculus that it feels like a parody.

    A list of reasons why people say guns shouldn't be added, and why they are idiots (it's back!).
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 1

    posted a message on Complete Rework of Combat System
    Quote from Neospector

    New weapons are just retextured old ones; I cannot stress this enough. Look at this: Most people suggest a "spear" weapon as a throwable item that deals damage like an iron sword. What it actually is is a one-use bow that deals iron-sword damage. That is it, end of story. I'd rather hit, regular attack over and over than seeing two thousand new fighting options every other minute someone moves in battle.

    I agree, and we should also remove the axe and spade, all they are is a re-skinned pickaxe. All we should have is 'the weapon' (for mobs) and the 'the tool' (for blocks), then we'd have the perfect game.
    /sarcasm

    Neospector, I challenge you to say something good about a suggestion, all you ever do is flame ideas for no apparent reason. This is a well thought out idea that adds skill to the game.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Assassins Creed 3
    Quote from Pixel8ed

    AC3 was Brotherhood.....

    No, Brotherhood was Assassin Creed II: Episode II, like what Valve did with Half-Life 2.
    Posted in: General Gaming
  • To post a comment, please .