Minecraft Forums

Hey everyone, I could really use some advice here please.

Quick Version:

My fps on vanilla 1.7.2 is amazing (500+ all the time), but when running 1.7.10 it's a LOT lower (80-150 average) with the same settings. And 1.7.10 stutters a lot more when loading chunks as well. Any idea why, is there some bug with 1.7.10??

I know 80-150fps is obviously extremely playable, but when running an Ultra shader (SEUS) and x128 or x256 resource pack, my fps drops to between 10-30. Whereas on 1.7.2 running the same shader and pack, 60-100fps

Long Version:

Last time I played around a year ago I was running Vanilla 1.7.2 MC at 500+ fps pretty much all the time depending on the world e.t.c., while running 16 render distance. At the time I was able to run a combo resource pack (x128 & x256 textures), SEUS 10.1 Ultra shader, and a metric ton of other mods without dropping below 60fps, in fact the framerate was averaging 80-100fps.

Now running 1.7.10 I'm having issues.

There is a lot more stuttering and my Vanilla fps is between 80 and 150 in most places. So I installed and setup Optifine and my graphics drivers back to optimal performance, allocated 6GB of RAM, also tried it with 8GB, but it still isn't running that well.

I know 80-150 fps is obviously extremely playable, but when running an Ultra shader (SEUS) and x128 or x256 resource pack, my fps drops to 10-30. Whereas on 1.7.2 running the same shader and pack, 60-100fps.

So I'm lost, is there an issue with 1.7.10 I haven't heard about... did they implement the new renderer in 1.7.10 as well?? Or maybe Java, are there issues with the latest 64bit Java versions?? Or newer Nvidia drivers, anyone else reported issues with them??

Any help would be a great help.

Thanks

Euphoria

If anything has been changed, there is a possibility that less memory is allocated to minecraft. Check this out: http://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/support/unmodified-minecraft-client/tutorials-and-faqs/1871637-tutorial-allocate-more-memory-for-minecraft

Quote from jacktheladMC»

If anything has been changed, there is a possibility that less memory is allocated to minecraft. Check this out: http://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/support/unmodified-minecraft-client/tutorials-and-faqs/1871637-tutorial-allocate-more-memory-for-minecraft

Sorry I forgot to mention that in my OP. I tried 6GB and 8GB allocated, it made a difference, but not a huge amount.

I could try more, but from tests and benchmarks I did a year or so ago, I don't think more will make much difference

Thanks for your reply.

P.S. I'm in the 3% and popping some corn Awesome sig.

I don't understand

Quote from The_Euphoria»

Sorry I forgot to mention that in my OP. I tried 6GB and 8GB allocated, it made a difference, but not a huge amount.

I could try more, but from tests and benchmarks I did a year or so ago, I don't think more will make much difference

Thanks for your reply.

P.S. I'm in the 3% and popping some corn Awesome sig.

Has anything changed with your computer? They age, and over time get slower. If your bandwith changed as well, that might have affected it.

Lol, thanks.

EDIT: You can always continue playing older versions. That's an amazing amount of FPS. The dude before was probably right though, the renderer.

No nothing has changed with my PC, and although it is now 2 years old, it's still very high-end.