Okay, get a life. You spend all of that time to write that long message that no one will read, shows you have too much time on your hands. Societal Gaming is for guys/girls who want to play games together and upload them, while they get money. What could be better? We created a good environment that everyone loves. Societal Gaming is for new youtubers who are looking to grow their channel, increase views, and giving them "shout out" each time the upload because their video is representing their channel. Stop hating, you spend way to much making idiotic comments on small gaming networks. Just leave, before you make yourself look any bit more retarded.
Just in case cuz I saw very much negative comment, can any person tell me if they got paid or not? And I want the person to be higher then just a tree puncher or atleast have 100 posts cuz otherwise it could be this guy of the network who just made another account to pretend he got paid.
The Meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything.
Join Date:
12/29/2012
Posts:
56
Member Details
Just in case cuz I saw very much negative comment, can any person tell me if they got paid or not? And I want the person to be higher then just a tree puncher or atleast have 100 posts cuz otherwise it could be this guy of the network who just made another account to pretend he got paid.
I'd be curious of the same, but I'd like to remind folks reading that the major problem with SocietalGaming's business model model is not one of simply getting paid - it's a matter of receiving enough additional publicity due to SocietalGaming to make up for the 30% cut one takes by publishing with them. Even if it pays its contributors the promised 70%, contributors still make less money than they would publishing alone unless SocietalGaming generates at least 40% additional publicity (assuming income scales linearly with viewcount).
I've dissected their model in greater detail in this post, which I'd encourage visiting folks to read. That SocietalGaming fails to acknowledge this problem indicates that it is either incompetent or dishonest.
Are you still hiring? I filled out an application but while I was reading the comments I think I saw you say that you are going to tell people who were hired on Friday but I kind of thought that might have been last Friday.
If you get a reply through skype within 2 days, then you have been accepted. if you don't recieve anything, denied.
I read it.
I'd be curious of the same, but I'd like to remind folks reading that the major problem with SocietalGaming's business model model is not one of simply getting paid - it's a matter of receiving enough additional publicity due to SocietalGaming to make up for the 30% cut one takes by publishing with them. Even if it pays its contributors the promised 70%, contributors still make less money than they would publishing alone unless SocietalGaming generates at least 40% additional publicity (assuming income scales linearly with viewcount).
I've dissected their model in greater detail in this post, which I'd encourage visiting folks to read. That SocietalGaming fails to acknowledge this problem indicates that it is either incompetent or dishonest.