sup guys a while ago i made a compact tileable combo-lock system and found that most people say it is huge yet 1wide ones and much better but what im wondering is do use preffer size or usefullness as i personaly want my stuff to be fool proof and un-cheatable
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
this has been icefox and as always have some fun out there
you arent going to get an objective yes or no to a question like that... its all about why you are building it... if it is purely for bling then you dont need it to be cheat proof... if you need it to be cheat proof then you may need to make it a bit bigger... it all depends on your application... you chose the design that works best for you based on what you need
sup guys a while ago i made a compact tileable combo-lock system and found that most people say it is huge yet 1wide ones and much better but what im wondering is do use preffer size or usefullness as i personaly want my stuff to be fool proof and un-cheatable
It depends from case to case, in general I prefer speed and that almost always means smaller (sometimes excessive compacting requires extra repeaters and thus adds delay). For a lock I suppose I'd prefer fool-proofness, but it really depends.
Usually it depends on some magic ratio of size available, resources available (if in survival), and complexity you want it to be. It's a decision you gotta make for each project on your own.
That said, if there's a 5x3 design and a 20x40 design that do the same thing at the same speed with relatively similar complexity (foolproofing) levels, then most people would just say the 5x3 is superior unless the 20x40 is absolutely needed.
Usually it depends on some magic ratio of size available, resources available (if in survival), and complexity you want it to be. It's a decision you gotta make for each project on your own.
That said, if there's a 5x3 design and a 20x40 design that do the same thing at the same speed with relatively similar complexity (foolproofing) levels, then most people would just say the 5x3 is superior unless the 20x40 is absolutely needed.
well true but my lock is about a 7x4 and has alot more addons and uses buttons
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
this has been icefox and as always have some fun out there
this has been icefox and as always have some fun out there
It depends from case to case, in general I prefer speed and that almost always means smaller (sometimes excessive compacting requires extra repeaters and thus adds delay). For a lock I suppose I'd prefer fool-proofness, but it really depends.
That said, if there's a 5x3 design and a 20x40 design that do the same thing at the same speed with relatively similar complexity (foolproofing) levels, then most people would just say the 5x3 is superior unless the 20x40 is absolutely needed.
well true but my lock is about a 7x4 and has alot more addons and uses buttons
this has been icefox and as always have some fun out there