The Meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything.
Join Date:
8/25/2012
Posts:
393
Member Details
The world does not suffer an overabundanc eof humans; what it suffers is an overabundance of stupidity, and humans just happen to be the primary source of it.
The problem has occurred to me. I feel that the best solution available is extensive bombing of Mexico and China. Why? Because Jeremy Clarkson recommended bombing Mexico, and China is where all the crowds are at.
7 billion people ( the world's current population ) can fit inside of the cite of L.A., and L.A. is approximately 503 sq.mi., so 162,405,566,600,397 can fit inside of the are of Africa. (11.67 million miles sq.)
Those areas are uninhabited as they're not suitable for living in (limited food + water supply, extreme climate, et cetera). Antarctica, for instance.
If humans stood shoulder-to-shoulder the entire human population could fit within 500 square miles, but that is not the point.
To add to that, there may be enough literal space for human populations to grow, but other ecosystems need space as well. We have already put too much pressure on the natural world.
I would say the world is fine right now, but give it another generation or two and yeah we might be a crowded planet. But what else is there to do, kill a ton of people to decrease the amount of people? No that doesn't sound good, or a better idea, just set the amount of kids you would be allowed to have like some countries have already done. I feel like 2 would be enough.
If we could multiply without the hurting nature/the environment, without fear of running out of room or resources, then we could go into the trillions and I would be fine. But that probably won't happen until we have advanced space travel and colonies on other planets.
I would say the world is fine right now, but give it another generation or two and yeah we might be a crowded planet. But what else is there to do, kill a ton of people to decrease the amount of people? No that doesn't sound good, or a better idea, just set the amount of kids you would be allowed to have like some countries have already done. I feel like 2 would be enough.
The world is not fine right now. We are already suffering extinctions due to loss of natural habitat, and as humans push themselves further into what natural land we have left, we will lose even more species.
I do agree that no one should have more than two kids. Not only would that help lower the population, but it also puts less financial and emotional burden on the individual families.
No, we should move to the sun!
Nice, cozy and extra warm!
And even then it's not going to be much of a problem while I'm alive so I don't care. Let the people have their fun procreating.
Hell yeah! +1 xD
GODDAMN IT
STUPID GENDERFLIP VIRUS
Or atleast not yet...
End. Of. Story.
Sire I inquire as I do with most, but do you mean to gloat? For is it truly such a tire to reply to the host with but a simple QUOTE?
signature
I usually have a neutral/undecided standpoint on things. And yes, I am part Swiss.
To add to that, there may be enough literal space for human populations to grow, but other ecosystems need space as well. We have already put too much pressure on the natural world.
The world is not fine right now. We are already suffering extinctions due to loss of natural habitat, and as humans push themselves further into what natural land we have left, we will lose even more species.
I do agree that no one should have more than two kids. Not only would that help lower the population, but it also puts less financial and emotional burden on the individual families.