What exactly do you categorize them as then? I'm curious.
I place a high emphasis on form. The human body is truly a work of art, and a fatty is just a living disgrace to that form, the same way insane bodybuilders and the anorexic are.
What kind of fat are we talking about here? Because there's fat, and then there's fat.
I am, in fact, a fat person. But I'm a fat person who can sit comfortably in an airplane seat without encroaching on the person next to me.
I place a high emphasis on form. The human body is truly a work of art, and a fatty is just a living disgrace to that form, the same way insane bodybuilders and the anorexic are.
Funny, I'm the same. I place a high emphasis on form. The human mind is truly a work of art, and a small minded or petty person is a living disgrace to that form, the same way that insane zealots and solipsists are.
Funny, I'm the same. I place a high emphasis on form. The human mind is truly a work of art, and a small minded or petty person is a living disgrace to that form, the same way that insane zealots and solipsists are.
Which is funny, because just about anybody wouldn't think twice about judging the hell out of an obese animal. They deserve to die really, because an obese animal has no means of survival. Somehow humanity seems to think it's transcended sex, survival, resource management, and functionality though.
I think it's because smokers' problems aren't as evident and immediate so it's ok to talk about them, but fat people live with almost greatly hampering conditions every minute of every day.
Which is funny, because just about anybody wouldn't think twice about judging the hell out of an obese animal. They deserve to die really, because an obese animal has no means of survival. Somehow humanity seems to think it's transcended sex, survival, resource management, and functionality though.
I think the same about an obese dog (for instance) as I do an obese human. They're obese. Yet, the dog is still a dog and the human is still a human.
It's ironic, because the whole theory of forms is itself a transcendent ideal, so I don't know how you'd mock the idea of transcendence yet maintain a strict theory of forms (or even just categories for that matter). It seems like a (poor) justification for petty prejudices.
Which is funny, because just about anybody wouldn't think twice about judging the hell out of an obese animal. They deserve to die really, because an obese animal has no means of survival. Somehow humanity seems to think it's transcended sex, survival, resource management, and functionality though.
Which is funny, that you should apply such animistic terms to the humans you value so dearly.
But I guess when you love only the body, you gotta do some crazy things.
I think the same about an obese dog (for instance) as I do an obese human. They're obese. Yet, the dog is still a dog and the human is still a human.
I never argued that they were no longer human as in homo sapiens(I used the word "people"). I'm saying that beauty of form as expressed in genetic chastity(AKA positive gene expression, being as beautiful as your DNA will allow you to be) is an issue which I take quite seriously.
It's ironic, because the whole theory of forms is itself a transcendent ideal, so I don't know how you'd mock the idea of transcendence yet maintain a strict theory of forms (or even just categories for that matter). It seems like a (poor) justification for petty prejudices.
I never studied transcendence or learned about the theory of forms. I don't believe in parading my ignorance in general, but please distance yourself from those movements when analyzing my words.
This just shows how shallow people are around here, putting so much attention to one's external look.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"God put two white people in the jungle without sunscreen. And they [had intercourse] and now we got people. We got Black people, Arab people, Oriental people and with the amount of inbreeding, very few retards. It seems so plausible!"
I never argued that they were no longer human as in homo sapiens. I'm saying that beauty of form as expressed in genetic chastity(AKA positive gene expression, being as beautiful as your DNA will allow you to be) is an issue which I take quite seriously.
I never studied transcendence or learned about the theory of forms. I don't believe in parading my ignorance in general, but please distance yourself from those movements when analyzing my words.
Then why hate on fatties? A factor in the reason they are fat is genetic predisposition. And the other is environmental factors. You're calling them sub-human because of things they, more-or-less, can't control.
Then why hate on fatties? A factor in the reason they are fat is genetic predisposition. And the other is environmental factors. You're calling them sub-human because of things they, more-or-less, can't control.
Their disposition towards excess adipose tissue is directly related to ignorance and lack of effort. Either would make them lose weight, but they choose not to become more informed or put in effort.
There is such a thing as a genetically skinny person. Genetically fat people, on the other hand are exceedingly rare.
I never argued that they were no longer human as in homo sapiens(I used the word "people"). I'm saying that beauty of form as expressed in genetic chastity(AKA positive gene expression, being as beautiful as your DNA will allow you to be) is an issue which I take quite seriously.
Forgive me for being blunt, but that's really stupid. :T
Their disposition towards excess adipose tissue is directly related to ignorance and lack of effort. Either would make them lose weight, but they choose not to become more informed or put in effort.
How is having a genetic predisposition that makes it hard for you to lose weight their fault because of ignorance?
How is the fact that the environment they live in is saturated with fatty foods high in sugar, and that in order to escape from those kinds of food you have to spend tremendously more and have skill in cooking?
How is having a genetic predisposition that makes it hard for you to lose weight their fault because of ignorance?
How is the fact that the environment they live in is saturated with fatty foods high in sugar, and that in order to escape from those kinds of food you have to spend tremendously more and have skill in cooking?
Umm...There are two ways to go about losing weight. You could do lots of cardio work to burn calories, and do calorie starving, little by little. It's unpleasant, but the health benefits and aesthetic benefits are unparalleled.
The other way is to adopt a hunter-gatherer diet. You don't really have to give up fat or even saturated fat, just sugar and high-glycemic foods.
And you don't really have to spend tremendously more. Just 5 days ago I bought a half pound of almonds, 4 bananas, 2 plums, and a carton of eggs for under $7.
Obesity is a combination of genetic predisposition and the oversaturation of sugars (both cane sugar and high frucose corn syrup) and other substances in our food.
Many people have similar diets while being entirely different weights.
It's far from uncommon to be a twig and yet eat just as much as an obese person.
Smoking, on the other hand, is the result of a fad, and enabled by the addiction of nicotine.
I don't think either party should be ridiculed at all, but both should be encouraged to try to fix it.
Obesity's solution is to simply watch the food intake to avoid the (frankly ridiculous) amount of sugars in foods. Skinny people could do with watching the intake too.
Smoking has nicotine patches and other helpful tools to kick the addiction.
Which is funny, because just about anybody wouldn't think twice about judging the hell out of an obese animal. They deserve to die really, because an obese animal has no means of survival. Somehow humanity seems to think it's transcended sex, survival, resource management, and functionality though.
You seem to be bordering dangerously close to social darwinism.
By virtue of people being obese it's obvious that humanity has transcended sex, survival, et cetera.
Would it not be logical to simply euthanize anyone who isn't a fit specimen of survival?
Which has nothing to do with anything; you're dodging the point. You would have to be a massive douchebag if you seriously go around thinking the what you've typed. You make me sick.
You have no idea how addiction works at all.
What exactly do you categorize them as then? I'm curious.
Keep your eyes on the skies.
Moraterra Single Player Survival - Last Updated: September 16, 4:00 PM PST
I place a high emphasis on form. The human body is truly a work of art, and a fatty is just a living disgrace to that form, the same way insane bodybuilders and the anorexic are.
Like anime? Try Visual Novels.
Addiction has nothing to do with falling to peer pressure.
Same here.
Funny, I'm the same. I place a high emphasis on form. The human mind is truly a work of art, and a small minded or petty person is a living disgrace to that form, the same way that insane zealots and solipsists are.
...
Which is funny, because just about anybody wouldn't think twice about judging the hell out of an obese animal. They deserve to die really, because an obese animal has no means of survival. Somehow humanity seems to think it's transcended sex, survival, resource management, and functionality though.
Like anime? Try Visual Novels.
I think the same about an obese dog (for instance) as I do an obese human. They're obese. Yet, the dog is still a dog and the human is still a human.
It's ironic, because the whole theory of forms is itself a transcendent ideal, so I don't know how you'd mock the idea of transcendence yet maintain a strict theory of forms (or even just categories for that matter). It seems like a (poor) justification for petty prejudices.
Which is funny, that you should apply such animistic terms to the humans you value so dearly.
But I guess when you love only the body, you gotta do some crazy things.
I never argued that they were no longer human as in homo sapiens(I used the word "people"). I'm saying that beauty of form as expressed in genetic chastity(AKA positive gene expression, being as beautiful as your DNA will allow you to be) is an issue which I take quite seriously.
I never studied transcendence or learned about the theory of forms. I don't believe in parading my ignorance in general, but please distance yourself from those movements when analyzing my words.
Like anime? Try Visual Novels.
Then why hate on fatties? A factor in the reason they are fat is genetic predisposition. And the other is environmental factors. You're calling them sub-human because of things they, more-or-less, can't control.
Their disposition towards excess adipose tissue is directly related to ignorance and lack of effort. Either would make them lose weight, but they choose not to become more informed or put in effort.
There is such a thing as a genetically skinny person. Genetically fat people, on the other hand are exceedingly rare.
Like anime? Try Visual Novels.
Forgive me for being blunt, but that's really stupid. :T
How is having a genetic predisposition that makes it hard for you to lose weight their fault because of ignorance?
How is the fact that the environment they live in is saturated with fatty foods high in sugar, and that in order to escape from those kinds of food you have to spend tremendously more and have skill in cooking?
I'd rather be stupid than fat :T
Umm...There are two ways to go about losing weight. You could do lots of cardio work to burn calories, and do calorie starving, little by little. It's unpleasant, but the health benefits and aesthetic benefits are unparalleled.
The other way is to adopt a hunter-gatherer diet. You don't really have to give up fat or even saturated fat, just sugar and high-glycemic foods.
And you don't really have to spend tremendously more. Just 5 days ago I bought a half pound of almonds, 4 bananas, 2 plums, and a carton of eggs for under $7.
Like anime? Try Visual Novels.
Many people have similar diets while being entirely different weights.
It's far from uncommon to be a twig and yet eat just as much as an obese person.
Smoking, on the other hand, is the result of a fad, and enabled by the addiction of nicotine.
I don't think either party should be ridiculed at all, but both should be encouraged to try to fix it.
Obesity's solution is to simply watch the food intake to avoid the (frankly ridiculous) amount of sugars in foods. Skinny people could do with watching the intake too.
Smoking has nicotine patches and other helpful tools to kick the addiction.
You seem to be bordering dangerously close to social darwinism.
By virtue of people being obese it's obvious that humanity has transcended sex, survival, et cetera.
Would it not be logical to simply euthanize anyone who isn't a fit specimen of survival?
Which has nothing to do with anything; you're dodging the point. You would have to be a massive douchebag if you seriously go around thinking the what you've typed. You make me sick.