Yeah, who here hasn't cheated the system when they were younger, to get onto websites?
My YouTube account says I'm 22 because I was eight when I made it. Truth is, I'm sure we're all guilty somewhere.
Rules are rules, plus he has posted videos of himself on the internet. That means he can not lie about his age. You could if you never showed your face.
Rules are rules, plus he has posted videos of himself on the internet. That means he can not lie about his age. You could if you never showed your face.
I mad my YouTube account when I was 12, Hence, my age being 17 on YouTube.
I never actually posted a video though, my friends and I upload them to one joint channel.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from killercomp »
Statisticaly, 5/4 people do not understand fractions.
I mad my YouTube account when I was 12, Hence, my age being 17 on YouTube.
I never actually posted a video though, my friends and I upload them to one joint channel.
But Youtube didn't have any proof that you were under age. They do with this kid's channel.
I mad my YouTube account when I was 12, Hence, my age being 17 on YouTube.
I never actually posted a video though, my friends and I upload them to one joint channel.
Troll bait. People, it is safe to assume that the internet is full of sociopaths. Why would you bare your soul to strangers, much less to strangers that are most likely sociopaths?
But I do the opposite. I post positive things to feel secure. If I feel threatened, or I threatened someone else, that makes me feel guilty. The pure opposite of secure.
I never said that flaming was the only way to make someone secure. It was a way, but not the only way.
I still don't understand why little kids are making videos, isn't there a age requirement to join?
Also to those people who say that if you don't like the video leave, well if that was the case then there wouldn't be a point in the dislike button now would there?
As for the comments couldn't the uploader just block or delete the comment of who is threatening him?
I hope no one takes this the wrong way but i don't think kids should be uploading videos especially not around the ages of 6-10 without the parents approval.
I dont see why people tell us if we don't like the video then to leave because that ruins the purpose of the dislike button and the comment section of why you think you didn't like the video or whatever reason, but threatening the uploader or name-calling is just stupid like come on! this isn't elementary school or middle school quit the name-calling.
I don't like discrimination, but I also don't like kids on youtube, facebook, etc. When I was a kid, I rode bikes with the neighbors and that was my fun for 10 hours every day. But kids these days want more and more technology. Kids under 13 shouldn't even need the internet... They surely can use books can't they? It will make them smarter and wiser if they used books, and it will give them more skills on how to look for important information.
6 year olds shouldn't be using YouTube to upload videos of themselves anyway. His own problem. If he wants it to stop then he should stop uploading videos.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"God put two white people in the jungle without sunscreen. And they [had intercourse] and now we got people. We got Black people, Arab people, Oriental people and with the amount of inbreeding, very few retards. It seems so plausible!"
A 11 year old can make videos just as good as a 16+ year old can!
Highly unlikely. And he's not 11, he's 6. He's just barely out of kindergarten, a small child. He shouldn't be on the internet.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"God put two white people in the jungle without sunscreen. And they [had intercourse] and now we got people. We got Black people, Arab people, Oriental people and with the amount of inbreeding, very few retards. It seems so plausible!"
Anyway, I never understood why age was so important. What difference does it make, really?
A 11 year old can make videos just as good as a 16+ year old can!
True. I've been amazed by the creations of younger people before. But they are usually far in between and quite unrefined.
Sometimes age does matter though. In some areas 11 years isn't even enough time to properly refine a skill. But... there will always be anomalies.
I agree though, sometimes people are fairly quick to judge, myself included. And that isn't only restricted to age.
I don't really care when children are on the internet, as long as they don't act like their age stereotype.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Against all the evil that Hell can conjure, all the wickedness that mankind can produce; We will send unto them... only you."
Colored text indicates in-character statements/actions. Because Forum Games has basically just been a big open RP for a long time now and it's the only place I ever post anymore, when I post at all.
Rules are rules, plus he has posted videos of himself on the internet. That means he can not lie about his age. You could if you never showed your face.
EDGY AND COOL!1 XDD
I mad my YouTube account when I was 12, Hence, my age being 17 on YouTube.
I never actually posted a video though, my friends and I upload them to one joint channel.
But Youtube didn't have any proof that you were under age. They do with this kid's channel.
He mad.
He mad youtube account.
tnuocca ebutuoy dam eH. He totally mad.
Do you remember why she was hated? Have you seen her past videos?
It's... insane.
Where are their PARENTS!??!?!?!
And parents should also know to keep their children from posting things on the internet until a certain age of maturity.
Card-carrying member of USA Archery and the Bathroom Readers' Institute.
I never said that flaming was the only way to make someone secure. It was a way, but not the only way.
Also to those people who say that if you don't like the video leave, well if that was the case then there wouldn't be a point in the dislike button now would there?
As for the comments couldn't the uploader just block or delete the comment of who is threatening him?
I hope no one takes this the wrong way but i don't think kids should be uploading videos especially not around the ages of 6-10 without the parents approval.
I dont see why people tell us if we don't like the video then to leave because that ruins the purpose of the dislike button and the comment section of why you think you didn't like the video or whatever reason, but threatening the uploader or name-calling is just stupid like come on! this isn't elementary school or middle school quit the name-calling.
I'll get me coat...
My dear toast_burner, I cannot agree to your conjecture.
I would say it is more like going to a shopping mall and discovering that the kid friendly section stops at the toystore...
Wanders off singing "Andy Wharhol got it wrong, Fifteen minutes is too long..."
Highly unlikely. And he's not 11, he's 6. He's just barely out of kindergarten, a small child. He shouldn't be on the internet.
True. I've been amazed by the creations of younger people before. But they are usually far in between and quite unrefined.
Sometimes age does matter though. In some areas 11 years isn't even enough time to properly refine a skill. But... there will always be anomalies.
I agree though, sometimes people are fairly quick to judge, myself included. And that isn't only restricted to age.
Not to be a ***** but I have difficulty NOT getting irritated when hearing children's voices...