Let's say you have the power right now, to amass a huge army and take over the world, ultimately to create peace. On the other hand, you have billions of supporters in your goals for peace.
Do you think peace would be possible to achieve without the violence and use the supports, or is peace only achievable through war? Or perhaps, peace can never be achieved.
Hi i am wegie125 here reporting news about a man that looked like paper he was wandering the streets with his pet bingu when he got depants and everything went wrong he got angry and became angerypaper.
Peace through violence is an oxymoron.
Despite the fact that you shut the world's problems up with your violence, that still doesn't change the fact that you used violence to achieve it, and many, many people are unhappy.
Peace is only achieved through peacefulness.
Violence only results in more violence, end of story.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logical universe that makes sense. But the real universe is always one step beyond logic."
-Muad'Dib
Peace through violence is an oxymoron.
Despite the fact that you shut the world's problems up with your violence, that still doesn't change the fact that you used violence to achieve it, and many, many people are unhappy.
Peace is only achieved through peacefulness.
True. But isn't there the counter argument that after the violence is over, that you can then truly bring peace and happiness to the people?
In my eyes, true peace is impossible to bring. Humans are too violent of creatures.
Hi i am wegie125 here reporting news about a man that looked like paper he was wandering the streets with his pet bingu when he got depants and everything went wrong he got angry and became angerypaper.
Well, this is possible. If I'm correct, I believe China tried this in the first century (I'm probably wrong). Plus, the United States went to war against Great Britain for peace. But, on the other hand, Ghandi freed India from England through peaceful protests (Then again, I'm probably wrong). Although, creating violence in exchange for peace isn't really morally correct, but it can definitely be done. But then what will your followers think of killing people for the sake of your own?
But of course, all peace never lasts forever. There will always be people who disagree. After WW2 was over, Russia went and put missiles in Cuba, which completely screwed up the peace. All the mess from the Middle East is from the peace that WW1 brought as well.
True. But isn't there the counter argument that after the violence is over, that you can then truly bring peace and happiness to the people?
In my eyes, true peace is impossible to bring. Humans are too violent of creatures.
It's not that we are too violent, it is that peace simply cannot exist with our intermingling minds and bodies. Our different thought processes will always conflict and bring more problems.
Hi i am wegie125 here reporting news about a man that looked like paper he was wandering the streets with his pet bingu when he got depants and everything went wrong he got angry and became angerypaper.
This, right here, is why I say that the Third Reich wasn't completely satanic and an utterly terrible idea. If they had succeeded, and had actually lead the world with the organization that they implied they would, there would be need for no more war.
Before you say it, yes, the Holocaust was a bad thing. I don't enjoy millions upon millions of people being killed. Putting that aside, though, a singular world government seems pretty good, and they actually had the ability to make it happen. Have you heard of the technology they were working on? Some of that stuff is just amazing.
I know you're about to freak out. Please don't. I'm just saying that one massive war in exchange for complete peace isn't too bad an offer.
This, right here, is why I say that the Third Reich wasn't completely satanic and an utterly terrible idea. If they had succeeded, and had actually lead the world with the organization that they implied they would, there would be need for no more war.
Before you say it, yes, the Holocaust was a bad thing. I don't enjoy millions upon millions of people being killed. Putting that aside, though, a singular world government seems pretty good, and they actually had the ability to make it happen. Have you heard of the technology they were working on? Some of that stuff is just amazing.
Hi i am wegie125 here reporting news about a man that looked like paper he was wandering the streets with his pet bingu when he got depants and everything went wrong he got angry and became angerypaper.
Peace exists in some places of the world but it doesn't mean it will stay that way forever. You can't achieve eternal peace or even long lasting peace, which is almost impossible. We could in a way if humanity destroyed itself, harharhar.
The Meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything.
Location:
Infinite Archipelago
Join Date:
10/10/2010
Posts:
342
Location:
The Orient's Pearl
Minecraft:
CloudJhi
Member Details
There would always be something that will cause strife. One of them is money. Other famous ones are power. Some want fame. In essence, true peace can never be achieved until you brainwash every single person on Earth into accepting each other and working for each others benefits.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Sometimes I wonder if it's all too easy.
Lying, cheating, stealing your way to victory.
Though just how far would you fall for a dream?
There would always be something that will cause strife. One of them is money. Other famous ones are power. Some want fame. In essence, true peace can never be achieved until you brainwash every single person on Earth into accepting each other and working for each others benefits.
This is very much true.
As long as no man/woman is created equal, no one will agree on the same thing. Some will find peaceful resolutions to subjects they disagree on, other will use violence in effort to make one or the other unwillingly agree on the subject. Humanity has never really been peaceful with one another, the day it does. All will be to late then, the past damage has been done, and will remain envisioned in peoples eyes through history forever. This is the world we live in, as population rises day by day. So will the unbalancing of peaceful resolutions, it is clear in sight.
Peace will only be obtained when every person in this world is dead
And that won't last very long anyway.
As I stated in my post at top of page. As long as no one is created equal, peace will never be so. Total annihilation is the only way for true peace to exist. The only way to obtain true peace, is when the Earth below our own feet gets destroyed from ourselves in attempt for true peace.
Let's say you have the power right now, to amass a huge army and take over the world, ultimately to create peace. On the other hand, you have billions of supporters in your goals for peace.
Do you think peace would be possible to achieve without the violence and use the supports, or is peace only achievable through war? Or perhaps, peace can never be achieved.
State your opinions.
If I helped you out, or made you laugh feel free to hit that green button!
Despite the fact that you shut the world's problems up with your violence, that still doesn't change the fact that you used violence to achieve it, and many, many people are unhappy.
Peace is only achieved through peacefulness.
-Muad'Dib
True. But isn't there the counter argument that after the violence is over, that you can then truly bring peace and happiness to the people?
In my eyes, true peace is impossible to bring. Humans are too violent of creatures.
But of course, all peace never lasts forever. There will always be people who disagree. After WW2 was over, Russia went and put missiles in Cuba, which completely screwed up the peace. All the mess from the Middle East is from the peace that WW1 brought as well.
It's not that we are too violent, it is that peace simply cannot exist with our intermingling minds and bodies. Our different thought processes will always conflict and bring more problems.
.
It's just, humans are violent. It's the human nature.
Like anime? Try Visual Novels.
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought with, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones."
Before you say it, yes, the Holocaust was a bad thing. I don't enjoy millions upon millions of people being killed. Putting that aside, though, a singular world government seems pretty good, and they actually had the ability to make it happen. Have you heard of the technology they were working on? Some of that stuff is just amazing.
I know you're about to freak out. Please don't. I'm just saying that one massive war in exchange for complete peace isn't too bad an offer.
My DeviantArt
I feel like this.
Sometimes I wonder if it's all too easy.
Lying, cheating, stealing your way to victory.
Though just how far would you fall for a dream?
This is very much true.
As long as no man/woman is created equal, no one will agree on the same thing. Some will find peaceful resolutions to subjects they disagree on, other will use violence in effort to make one or the other unwillingly agree on the subject. Humanity has never really been peaceful with one another, the day it does. All will be to late then, the past damage has been done, and will remain envisioned in peoples eyes through history forever. This is the world we live in, as population rises day by day. So will the unbalancing of peaceful resolutions, it is clear in sight.
And that won't last very long anyway.
As I stated in my post at top of page. As long as no one is created equal, peace will never be so. Total annihilation is the only way for true peace to exist. The only way to obtain true peace, is when the Earth below our own feet gets destroyed from ourselves in attempt for true peace.