Talk to me when you get to the part in your text book, differentiating between "then" and "than".
You might want to study more on punctuation as well.
Far from it. It's called I don't really give a **** what someone who isn't Mrs. Nieten says about my grammar. Your not going to determine if I fail an assignment or not.
On Topic: I believe in Creationism Evolution to the fullest. That's not a theory folks.
Far from it. It's called I don't really give a **** what someone who isn't Mrs. Nieten says about my grammar. Your not going to determine if I fail an assignment or not.
On Topic: I believe in Creationism Evolution to the fullest. That's not a theory folks.
You're right about that. Creationism isn't even a hypothesis.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who could not hear the music."
This guy is so funny. I almost want to sig this. He just denied Micro Evolution. LOL
Again, reading comprehension is important. Knowing the difference between hypothesis and theory is also important, so that you don't make a fool of yourself.
Again, reading comprehension is important. Knowing the difference between hypothesis and theory is also important, so that you don't make a fool of yourself.
There's no need to put the word "micro" in front of it. You simply fail to realize how idiotic it makes you sound.
"Evolution has been proven" will suffice.
It's sad that I've provided resources for you to look into, but you just don't want to learn. I'm done trying to talk to you. The information is out there, if you would just look for it.
There's no need to put the word "micro" in front of it. You simply fail to realize how idiotic it makes you sound.
"Evolution has been proven" will suffice.
It's sad that I've provided resources for you to look into, but you just don't want to learn.
In a sense.
The only reason macro-evolution cannot be proven is because it cannot be observed. This means you cannot completely run it through the scientific process.
You can observe micro-evolution so it is proven.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Gary Coleman »
Why do all these jive-ass mutha****as gots to be askin' me all these ignant jive-ass mutha****a questions all the time?
There's no need to put the word "micro" in front of it. You simply fail to realize how idiotic it makes you sound.
"Evolution has been proven" will suffice.
It's sad that I've provided resources for you to look into, but you just don't want to learn. I'm done trying to talk to you. The information is out there, if you would just look for it.
Evolution is still a theory dude. I hate to break reality to you but its the sad and pitiful truth.
This is the last your trolling will get out of me. I hope you actually put your amazing reading comprehension skills to use.
I've never trolled you simply rejected your words. Nothing will change my mind I will take it to the grave that I am considered ignorant by many people. Well that's fine.
I've never trolled you simply rejected your words. Nothing will change my mind I will take it to the grave that I am considered ignorant by many people. Well that's fine.
Admitting to "simply [rejecting] your words" proves that you're ignorant. A non-ignorant person will listen to what the other person has to say, consider their words, and make conclusions based on that. They do not dismiss the other person outright, as you have just admitted to doing.
The topic of evolution vs. creation has been done to death. It's an old debate, and none of us are ever likely to win it barring some sort of massive epiphany on one side or the other. Hell, maybe God will show up one day and tell us that he's been trolling us the whole time. Maybe we'll find out that the universe is destroyed and recreated in under a second every ten seconds. Both of those beliefs would be just as valid as mainstream creationist beliefs.
That being said, may I ask why you believe what you do? I'd prefer something a little bit more detailed than "because mom/dad/God/the Bible/etc. told me so." For example, I accept the truth of evolution because there is real, concrete evidence for it. I don't believe in God or creationism because when I was very young, I decided that it all sounded like a stupid idea anyway, and could I just go play with my toys now? Since then I've refined the "it all sounded like a stupid idea" part quite a bit, and now I play with grownup toys.
Your turn.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Go then, there are other worlds than these. - Stephen King I want to know God's thoughts, the rest are details. - Albert Einstein
The only reason macro-evolution cannot be proven is because it cannot be observed. This means you cannot completely run it through the scientific process.
You can observe micro-evolution so it is proven.
This micro/macro nonsense is an arbitrary distinction invented by creationists to attempt to give themselves more room to argue. They realize that most people aren't dumb enough not to notice variations within one's own family. So they try to play off speciation ("macro-evolution") as a separate and non-occurring phenomenon.
This works because many people will just take their pastor's word for it, instead of looking into the topic themselves and finding out that speciation does occur and it has been observed many times.
Also, science doesn't prove anything. It can only disprove.
Admitting to "simply [rejecting] your words" proves that you're ignorant. A non-ignorant person will listen to what the other person has to say, consider their words, and make conclusions based on that. They do not dismiss the other person outright, as you have just admitted to doing.
The topic of evolution vs. creation has been done to death. It's an old debate, and none of us are ever likely to win it barring some sort of massive epiphany on one side or the other. Hell, maybe God will show up one day and tell us that he's been trolling us the whole time. Maybe we'll find out that the universe is destroyed and recreated in under a second every ten seconds. Both of those beliefs would be just as valid as mainstream creationist beliefs.
That being said, may I ask why you believe what you do? I'd prefer something a little bit more detailed than "because mom/dad/God/the Bible/etc. told me so." For example, I accept the truth of evolution because there is real, concrete evidence for it. I don't believe in God or creationism because when I was very young, I decided that it all sounded like a stupid idea anyway, and could I just go play with my toys now? Since then I've refined the "it all sounded like a stupid idea" part quite a bit, and now I play with grownup toys.
Your turn.
I believe in it just because I believe in it. I'm not ignorant enough to deny the creator the respect he deserves. I also think on Isaac Newtons side of things I believe God constantly intervenes on things even when it seems like he never does. I also don't think Atheism has significant evidence to prove to me to drop a faith. I promise if they ever explain in a logical and reasonable answer how the universe came to be then I will change. For all I know they could be lying about Evolution even though I know they are. I know people who did Evolution Biology who will admit they make up things.
I believe in it just because I believe in it.
Well that's no reason to believe in something.
I'm not ignorant enough to deny the creator the respect he deserves.
You're assuming there is one.
I also think on Isaac Newtons side of things I believe God constantly intervenes on things even when it seems like he never does.
How convenient. Imaginary friends have similar properties.
I also don't think Atheism has significant evidence to prove to me to drop a faith.
Evidence for what? Atheism doesn't propose anything.
I promise if they ever explain in a logical and reasonable answer how the universe came to be then I will change.
I doubt this. It seems more likely you would ask for answers to the next unknown, and the next, and so on.
For all I know they could be lying about Evolution even though I know they are. I know people who did Evolution Biology who will admit they make up things.
What?
Think again I'm in honors Language Arts with one of the highest reading levels in my school. I think I have more comprehension then you sir.
FTFY
And I failed English in high school. Twice.
Talk to me when you get to the part in your text book, differentiating between "then" and "than".
You might want to study more on punctuation as well.
Far from it. It's called I don't really give a **** what someone who isn't Mrs. Nieten says about my grammar. Your not going to determine if I fail an assignment or not.
On Topic: I believe in Creationism Evolution to the fullest. That's not a theory folks.
logged in just to give you a +1
TEEHEE
you mean "you're" ?
Of course I do.
You're right about that. Creationism isn't even a hypothesis.
This guy is so funny. I almost want to sig this. He just denied Micro Evolution. LOL
Again, reading comprehension is important. Knowing the difference between hypothesis and theory is also important, so that you don't make a fool of yourself.
Well Micro Evolution is proven.
There's no need to put the word "micro" in front of it. You simply fail to realize how idiotic it makes you sound.
"Evolution has been proven" will suffice.
It's sad that I've provided resources for you to look into, but you just don't want to learn. I'm done trying to talk to you. The information is out there, if you would just look for it.
In a sense.
The only reason macro-evolution cannot be proven is because it cannot be observed. This means you cannot completely run it through the scientific process.
You can observe micro-evolution so it is proven.
Evolution is still a theory dude. I hate to break reality to you but its the sad and pitiful truth.
Common Misconceptions
This is the last your trolling will get out of me. I hope you actually put your amazing reading comprehension skills to use.
I've never trolled you simply rejected your words. Nothing will change my mind I will take it to the grave that I am considered ignorant by many people. Well that's fine.
Admitting to "simply [rejecting] your words" proves that you're ignorant. A non-ignorant person will listen to what the other person has to say, consider their words, and make conclusions based on that. They do not dismiss the other person outright, as you have just admitted to doing.
The topic of evolution vs. creation has been done to death. It's an old debate, and none of us are ever likely to win it barring some sort of massive epiphany on one side or the other. Hell, maybe God will show up one day and tell us that he's been trolling us the whole time. Maybe we'll find out that the universe is destroyed and recreated in under a second every ten seconds. Both of those beliefs would be just as valid as mainstream creationist beliefs.
That being said, may I ask why you believe what you do? I'd prefer something a little bit more detailed than "because mom/dad/God/the Bible/etc. told me so." For example, I accept the truth of evolution because there is real, concrete evidence for it. I don't believe in God or creationism because when I was very young, I decided that it all sounded like a stupid idea anyway, and could I just go play with my toys now? Since then I've refined the "it all sounded like a stupid idea" part quite a bit, and now I play with grownup toys.
Your turn.
I want to know God's thoughts, the rest are details. - Albert Einstein
Gravity can be called a theory. Nobody would disapprove gravity of course because they are welcomed to try that out on the highest building.
Evolution is a theory as much as Napoleon's existence is a theory.
This micro/macro nonsense is an arbitrary distinction invented by creationists to attempt to give themselves more room to argue. They realize that most people aren't dumb enough not to notice variations within one's own family. So they try to play off speciation ("macro-evolution") as a separate and non-occurring phenomenon.
This works because many people will just take their pastor's word for it, instead of looking into the topic themselves and finding out that speciation does occur and it has been observed many times.
Also, science doesn't prove anything. It can only disprove.
And the sun is still just a star.
There's nothing sad or pitiful about it. Theory is as good as it gets. Why place emotional stock in an explanatory construct?
Other "sad and pitiful" theories:
Gravitation
Germ Theory
Atomic Theory
Plate Tectonics
Kinetic Theory
I believe in it just because I believe in it. I'm not ignorant enough to deny the creator the respect he deserves. I also think on Isaac Newtons side of things I believe God constantly intervenes on things even when it seems like he never does. I also don't think Atheism has significant evidence to prove to me to drop a faith. I promise if they ever explain in a logical and reasonable answer how the universe came to be then I will change. For all I know they could be lying about Evolution even though I know they are. I know people who did Evolution Biology who will admit they make up things.