I am not going to claim to know the details of the OP's case in this thread so I don't know whether the suspension that other person got was deserved or not.
I can however, give my input about some of the responses here and I am sure reddit is not the only forum with this problem, it happens on a lot including social media platforms, mainly because people are misinformed or outright prejudiced about how moderation works on these sites and they seem to just run with the assumption that every single suspension someone receives, "oh this person must have done something wrong".
This is basically like saying politicians and private companies never make bad decisions whenever they punish someone, even though there is plenty of evidence to show the contrary, being human they are still capable of screwing up big time and being out of order to individuals or groups of individuals whenever it suits their purposes or agenda, Anyhow I do not want to get into details about all this as I know political discussion isn't allowed on this forum, I only wanted to give examples where enforcement of rules don't always go as they should.
Back on topic, I don't appreciate the bullying the OP received on the other forum, I don't know this other person, I have no connection or contact with him or her, but based what I am able to make out so far, it looks as though this is a case of retaliation after what appears to be getting insulted during a competitive online game. I don't know about anyone else here, but I personally wouldn't call a suspension, temporary or otherwise, fair for this, especially if the messages did not contain threats or suggestion of self harm. And no, swearing alone shouldn't be enough to get someone a ban, nor should telling somebody else to get lost in retaliation to someone who antagonized them first, if people can't handle curse words being used then they probably shouldn't be using the internet if they're that easily offended, it should depend on the context of the situation whether or not someone should receive a ban of any kind. Whether people like it or not, context does matter. We do this with our court systems to some extent when criminal cases are dealt with even though sometimes, that does go wrong, why should it be any different when dealing with moderation on websites? just because these are private platforms it doesn't make human rights null and void and what is said and goes on these platforms can negatively affect the mental health of people, that includes how moderators treat people who use their sites.
While I have not received a 2 week suspension on Xbox Live for anything, I know somebody who has and I can tell people I do not appreciate the abusiveness going on, if she had told everyone about her case and the reason for it I can almost guarantee there will be hateful comments being made about her, when all she did was tell people to stop sending her rude messages and she gave me screenshots to prove it.
It's probably the reason why she doesn't want this to go public, the toxicity involved and she knows how a lot of people are in the world.
That is of course her own choice and out of respect for her anonymity I have chosen not to mention her name when bringing this up. Even without her testimony about this there is enough evidence to show just how harsh and overly critical people can be in their replies when we are talking about other people's cases that did go public, making judgements about whether or not someone else did deserve a suspension without enough information to make that judgement.
It doesn't look like enough people care though and I probably won't be getting many replies about this issue I've seen happen to other people, even if I did, because of the ignorance of the general public it's likely this isn't going to be a civil discussion. A lot of people have a bully mentality unfortunately, not everyone does, but too many people do and quite frankly I am sick of it, even seeing potential and highly probable unfairness happen to other people is enough to grind my gears. At least when I die, I won't have to put up with this backwards world any longer.
I've said what I wanted to say and what has been bothering me for some time,
This is probably not the best forum to be talking about this given the rules here,
and no one likes drama, but do not know of any other outlet I can express concerns about this topic,
without a thread getting locked or worse, so I have chosen to take this chance, in the hope I can make a difference.
I am not going to claim to know the details of the OP's case in this thread so I don't know whether the suspension that other person got was deserved or not.
I can however, give my input about some of the responses here and I am sure reddit is not the only forum with this problem, it happens on a lot including social media platforms, mainly because people are misinformed or outright prejudiced about how moderation works on these sites and they seem to just run with the assumption that every single suspension someone receives, "oh this person must have done something wrong".
This is basically like saying politicians and private companies never make bad decisions whenever they punish someone, even though there is plenty of evidence to show the contrary, being human they are still capable of screwing up big time and being out of order to individuals or groups of individuals whenever it suits their purposes or agenda, Anyhow I do not want to get into details about all this as I know political discussion isn't allowed on this forum, I only wanted to give examples where enforcement of rules don't always go as they should.
Back on topic, I don't appreciate the bullying the OP received on the other forum, I don't know this other person, I have no connection or contact with him or her, but based what I am able to make out so far, it looks as though this is a case of retaliation after what appears to be getting insulted during a competitive online game. I don't know about anyone else here, but I personally wouldn't call a suspension, temporary or otherwise, fair for this, especially if the messages did not contain threats or suggestion of self harm. And no, swearing alone shouldn't be enough to get someone a ban, nor should telling somebody else to get lost in retaliation to someone who antagonized them first, if people can't handle curse words being used then they probably shouldn't be using the internet if they're that easily offended, it should depend on the context of the situation whether or not someone should receive a ban of any kind. Whether people like it or not, context does matter. We do this with our court systems to some extent when criminal cases are dealt with even though sometimes, that does go wrong, why should it be any different when dealing with moderation on websites? just because these are private platforms it doesn't make human rights null and void and what is said and goes on these platforms can negatively affect the mental health of people, that includes how moderators treat people who use their sites.
While I have not received a 2 week suspension on Xbox Live for anything, I know somebody who has and I can tell people I do not appreciate the abusiveness going on, if she had told everyone about her case and the reason for it I can almost guarantee there will be hateful comments being made about her, when all she did was tell people to stop sending her rude messages and she gave me screenshots to prove it.
It's probably the reason why she doesn't want this to go public, the toxicity involved and she knows how a lot of people are in the world.
That is of course her own choice and out of respect for her anonymity I have chosen not to mention her name when bringing this up. Even without her testimony about this there is enough evidence to show just how harsh and overly critical people can be in their replies when we are talking about other people's cases that did go public, making judgements about whether or not someone else did deserve a suspension without enough information to make that judgement.
It doesn't look like enough people care though and I probably won't be getting many replies about this issue I've seen happen to other people, even if I did, because of the ignorance of the general public it's likely this isn't going to be a civil discussion. A lot of people have a bully mentality unfortunately, not everyone does, but too many people do and quite frankly I am sick of it, even seeing potential and highly probable unfairness happen to other people is enough to grind my gears. At least when I die, I won't have to put up with this backwards world any longer.
I've said what I wanted to say and what has been bothering me for some time,
This is probably not the best forum to be talking about this given the rules here,
and no one likes drama, but do not know of any other outlet I can express concerns about this topic,
without a thread getting locked or worse, so I have chosen to take this chance, in the hope I can make a difference.
To people who says "It is not cool to repost mods": It is greatly cool and finding it uncool is oppressive, users are free to repost. #DefectiveByDesign #AntiCopyright
I will stay in mostly 1.7.10 and sometimes 1.12.2 until all bad up(!)dates get reverted.
My mod with manually registered ItemBlocks of technical blocks:
Oh... The person who asked for information got nonsensical answers instead of what he/she wanted. That is weird...
Another nonsense is "1.X.X Not Supported". Stop that (who does it).
Believe it or not this is a common problem, and these weren't just unhelpful replies from them.
It's possible for people to give useless information or information that doesn't resolve a problem another is having, but at the same time not be rude.
I'm not saying you're rude, you and allyourbasesaregone are civil here which is good.
While it could be the case that the OP in the reddit thread in question could have done something wrong, we do not know what he or she did or didn't do, the reality is competitive online games can be stressful especially if the game is difficult and involves something to the effect of a raid mission.
It is certainly understandable and worthy of sympathy if someone who got insulted, replied back with similar rudeness. Common sense tells you you are in the right to defend yourself even in the case of verbal abuse. It's not always possible to get the other individual who did these things to you banned or punished, what if what they did to us happened in an anonymous game chat? then it is nearly impossible to prove it unless a recording via game capture was done.
This is one good example why moderation of social media including gaming platforms suck and almost never work,
obviously we need rules but the problem is those rules don't always get enforced fairly because of flawed methods of reporting as well as moderators who don't investigate things properly. I also know some people who broke the rules or did things that fall into some loophole or grey area and never received a single punishment or warning on the platforms they did these things on. Sometimes I am able to prove it but even then, if they take place in private conversations then I am not exactly going to be allowed to post them in public.
Believe it or not this is a common problem, and these weren't just unhelpful replies from them.
It's possible for people to give useless information or information that doesn't resolve a problem another is having, but at the same time not be rude.
I'm not saying you're rude, you and allyourbasesaregone are civil here which is good.
While it could be the case that the OP in the reddit thread in question could have done something wrong, we do not know what he or she did or didn't do, the reality is competitive online games can be stressful especially if the game is difficult and involves something to the effect of a raid mission.
It is certainly understandable and worthy of sympathy if someone who got insulted, replied back with similar rudeness. Common sense tells you you are in the right to defend yourself even in the case of verbal abuse. It's not always possible to get the other individual who did these things to you banned or punished, what if what they did to us happened in an anonymous game chat? then it is nearly impossible to prove it unless a recording via game capture was done.
This is one good example why moderation of social media including gaming platforms suck and almost never work,
obviously we need rules but the problem is those rules don't always get enforced fairly because of flawed methods of reporting as well as moderators who don't investigate things properly. I also know some people who broke the rules or did things that fall into some loophole or grey area and never received a single punishment or warning on the platforms they did these things on. Sometimes I am able to prove it but even then, if they take place in private conversations then I am not exactly going to be allowed to post them in public.
That is the situation in your case: Rules are good but application and documentation of rules are bad {this is a severe problem which should be prevented by moderators/administrators of the respective platform}.
We need rules but also we need a good documentation of rules, also, that rules should be applied in a fair way.
That is the fundamental principle of all rules: They are applied fairly without unjust privileges/restriction. If that principle gets ignored, severe problems arise.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To people who says "It is not cool to repost mods": It is greatly cool and finding it uncool is oppressive, users are free to repost. #DefectiveByDesign #AntiCopyright
I will stay in mostly 1.7.10 and sometimes 1.12.2 until all bad up(!)dates get reverted.
My mod with manually registered ItemBlocks of technical blocks:
That is the situation in your case: Rules are good but application and documentation of rules are bad {this is a severe problem which should be prevented by moderators/administrators of the respective platform}.
We need rules but also we need a good documentation of rules, also, that rules should be applied in a fair way.
That is the fundamental principle of all rules: They are applied fairly without unjust privileges/restriction. If that principle gets ignored, severe problems arise.
Of course, repeated displays of disrespecting rules, especially those on harassment should be punished.
In case where someone told another person to leave them alone even if they were swearing, if I were a moderator dealing with this I'd just give that person a stern warning and time to cool off, reminding them that further offensive messages would mean punishments would be needed.
But things like threats or repeated bad messages would obviously mean more severe measures would need to be taken, sometimes perma ban. I don't disagree with this outcome because this is simply done to make a community safer and more inclusive for people. If people don't learn to back off on their own then they should suffer the consequences like everybody else who does it. I just think although this is my opinion, that context or well thought out verdicts on individual cases do matter.
If no harassment is involved and if it's a case of someone posting copyright infringing material, in most cases the correct way to deal with it is to just delete the offending material, block that person from sending links from unofficial sources and remove their privileges on uploading files, problem solved, they cannot upload copyright infringing material if the features that allow it are blocked.
That is the situation in your case: Rules are good but application and documentation of rules are bad {this is a severe problem which should be prevented by moderators/administrators of the respective platform}.
We need rules but also we need a good documentation of rules, also, that rules should be applied in a fair way.
That is the fundamental principle of all rules: They are applied fairly without unjust privileges/restriction. If that principle gets ignored, severe problems arise.
Of course, repeated displays of disrespecting rules, especially those on harassment should be punished.
In case where someone told another person to leave them alone even if they were swearing, if I were a moderator dealing with this I'd just give that person a stern warning and time to cool off, reminding them that further offensive messages would mean punishments would be needed.
But things like threats or repeated bad messages would obviously mean more severe measures would need to be taken, sometimes perma ban. I don't disagree with this outcome because this is simply done to make a community safer and more inclusive for people. If people don't learn to back off on their own then they should suffer the consequences like everybody else who does it. I just think although this is my opinion, that context or well thought out verdicts on individual cases do matter.
If no harassment is involved and if it's a case of someone posting copyright infringing material, in most cases the correct way to deal with it is to just delete the offending material, block that person from sending links from unofficial sources and remove their privileges on uploading files, problem solved, they cannot upload copyright infringing material if the features that allow it are blocked.
*I was referencing unjust suppression, which is worse than ignoring rule violations, examples:
-User A posted spam, also User B posted spam. If User A gets warning, but User B gets ignored, that is a thing to object wildly
-User 1 requested support for 1.19.3 and got support. User 2 requested support for 1.12.2 and their thread got locked. User 3 have seen what was happening, and created a thread to resist the lock of User 2's thread and provided support to User 2. Therefore, User 3 got a formal warning, User 2 got a informal warning. That is a more typical case of unjust suppression.
The inversion of unjust suppression is equally applied rules, same examples:
-User A posted spam, also User B posted spam. Both of them got an informal warning.
-{similar as the second example} User 2 got proper support from User 3 and nothing bad was happened.
To people who says "It is not cool to repost mods": It is greatly cool and finding it uncool is oppressive, users are free to repost. #DefectiveByDesign #AntiCopyright
I will stay in mostly 1.7.10 and sometimes 1.12.2 until all bad up(!)dates get reverted.
My mod with manually registered ItemBlocks of technical blocks:
Of course, repeated displays of disrespecting rules, especially those on harassment should be punished.
In case where someone told another person to leave them alone even if they were swearing, if I were a moderator dealing with this I'd just give that person a stern warning and time to cool off, reminding them that further offensive messages would mean punishments would be needed.
But things like threats or repeated bad messages would obviously mean more severe measures would need to be taken, sometimes perma ban. I don't disagree with this outcome because this is simply done to make a community safer and more inclusive for people. If people don't learn to back off on their own then they should suffer the consequences like everybody else who does it. I just think although this is my opinion, that context or well thought out verdicts on individual cases do matter.
If no harassment is involved and if it's a case of someone posting copyright infringing material, in most cases the correct way to deal with it is to just delete the offending material, block that person from sending links from unofficial sources and remove their privileges on uploading files, problem solved, they cannot upload copyright infringing material if the features that allow it are blocked.
The main problem is disrespecting other people, not rules. Due to this, most forums has "be respectful to others" rule.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To people who says "It is not cool to repost mods": It is greatly cool and finding it uncool is oppressive, users are free to repost. #DefectiveByDesign #AntiCopyright
I will stay in mostly 1.7.10 and sometimes 1.12.2 until all bad up(!)dates get reverted.
My mod with manually registered ItemBlocks of technical blocks:
The main problem is disrespecting other people, not rules. Due to this, most forums has "be respectful to others" rule.
Sometimes the rules are unreasonable as well, but we still have to follow them. Treating people with respect is good, but sometimes there are other rules in the terms of service which are not only inconvenient but they border on censorship, even if there is a legal issue involved.
Case #1 - A person gets their videos forcibly muted just because of some background music in a video game that came with the game itself, in the worst case scenario, the account gets suspended which can and does happen to people. The sensible thing to do is simply to demonetize the video, if necessary put a disclaimer in the video description or ask the person who uploaded the video to do this.
Case #2 - Swearing, because of people who are overly dramatic people do get silenced for the simple use of swear words, and while it is true that it's not appropriate to let minors hear this, the problem is assuming everyone who uses these platforms are children or that the target audience for the videos are children. If parents don't want minors to hear this in people's podcasts or video game captures, they have the responsibility to deny their child access, it's not the governments job to do this or the private platform owner. People need to learn to take responsibility for their own offspring, unfortunately some people expect other's to do everything for them, which pardon my English for this, makes people weak in character or unwilling to use any initiative. Censorship policies against swearing also make life harder for content creators, whether they are gamers or comedians. We shouldn't be basing our policies around pandering to religious zealots who are offended by everything they disagree with.
Case #3 - we already discussed it in relation to what happened to somebody else, insult in retaliation to somebody else who may have instigated the problem, which is not always possible to prove, or even if it is provable, if these take place in private messages, the act of leaking these messages can sometimes be enough to get the victim suspended. I do think people have a right to privacy, but that doesn't mean I think people should be allowed to abuse the rules of anonymity to cause other's problems, which is exactly the issue going on gaming platforms in anonymous chats and it continues to be a significant problem. Not to mention the loopholes that exist in Code of Conduct when people use other platforms to evade punishment or accountability.
I am not going to claim to know the details of the OP's case in this thread so I don't know whether the suspension that other person got was deserved or not.
I can however, give my input about some of the responses here and I am sure reddit is not the only forum with this problem, it happens on a lot including social media platforms, mainly because people are misinformed or outright prejudiced about how moderation works on these sites and they seem to just run with the assumption that every single suspension someone receives, "oh this person must have done something wrong".
This is basically like saying politicians and private companies never make bad decisions whenever they punish someone, even though there is plenty of evidence to show the contrary, being human they are still capable of screwing up big time and being out of order to individuals or groups of individuals whenever it suits their purposes or agenda, Anyhow I do not want to get into details about all this as I know political discussion isn't allowed on this forum, I only wanted to give examples where enforcement of rules don't always go as they should.
Back on topic, I don't appreciate the bullying the OP received on the other forum, I don't know this other person, I have no connection or contact with him or her, but based what I am able to make out so far, it looks as though this is a case of retaliation after what appears to be getting insulted during a competitive online game. I don't know about anyone else here, but I personally wouldn't call a suspension, temporary or otherwise, fair for this, especially if the messages did not contain threats or suggestion of self harm. And no, swearing alone shouldn't be enough to get someone a ban, nor should telling somebody else to get lost in retaliation to someone who antagonized them first, if people can't handle curse words being used then they probably shouldn't be using the internet if they're that easily offended, it should depend on the context of the situation whether or not someone should receive a ban of any kind. Whether people like it or not, context does matter. We do this with our court systems to some extent when criminal cases are dealt with even though sometimes, that does go wrong, why should it be any different when dealing with moderation on websites? just because these are private platforms it doesn't make human rights null and void and what is said and goes on these platforms can negatively affect the mental health of people, that includes how moderators treat people who use their sites.
While I have not received a 2 week suspension on Xbox Live for anything, I know somebody who has and I can tell people I do not appreciate the abusiveness going on, if she had told everyone about her case and the reason for it I can almost guarantee there will be hateful comments being made about her, when all she did was tell people to stop sending her rude messages and she gave me screenshots to prove it.
It's probably the reason why she doesn't want this to go public, the toxicity involved and she knows how a lot of people are in the world.
That is of course her own choice and out of respect for her anonymity I have chosen not to mention her name when bringing this up. Even without her testimony about this there is enough evidence to show just how harsh and overly critical people can be in their replies when we are talking about other people's cases that did go public, making judgements about whether or not someone else did deserve a suspension without enough information to make that judgement.
It doesn't look like enough people care though and I probably won't be getting many replies about this issue I've seen happen to other people, even if I did, because of the ignorance of the general public it's likely this isn't going to be a civil discussion. A lot of people have a bully mentality unfortunately, not everyone does, but too many people do and quite frankly I am sick of it, even seeing potential and highly probable unfairness happen to other people is enough to grind my gears. At least when I die, I won't have to put up with this backwards world any longer.
I've said what I wanted to say and what has been bothering me for some time,
This is probably not the best forum to be talking about this given the rules here,
and no one likes drama, but do not know of any other outlet I can express concerns about this topic,
without a thread getting locked or worse, so I have chosen to take this chance, in the hope I can make a difference.
How many communication ban strikes : xboxone (reddit.com)
This topic may be relevant as well, Agent:
1.7.10 and 1.12.2 are good. Stop "1.X.X Not Supported"! - Discussion - Minecraft: Java Edition - Minecraft Forum - Minecraft Forum
Quote me if you need me to reply to something. DM me if I don't answer that.
Contacts on other sites currently disabled, if you want me to add you on steam, discord, or PMC, ask me and pass me your name so I add you.
Oh... The person who asked for information got nonsensical answers instead of what he/she wanted. That is weird...
Another nonsense is "1.X.X Not Supported". Stop that (who does it).
To people who says "It is not cool to repost mods": It is greatly cool and finding it uncool is oppressive, users are free to repost. #DefectiveByDesign #AntiCopyright
I will stay in mostly 1.7.10 and sometimes 1.12.2 until all bad up(!)dates get reverted.
My mod with manually registered ItemBlocks of technical blocks:
What the hell happened to minecraft?#Post6 - My opinions about new up(!)dates since 15w33c.
Believe it or not this is a common problem, and these weren't just unhelpful replies from them.
It's possible for people to give useless information or information that doesn't resolve a problem another is having, but at the same time not be rude.
I'm not saying you're rude, you and allyourbasesaregone are civil here which is good.
While it could be the case that the OP in the reddit thread in question could have done something wrong, we do not know what he or she did or didn't do, the reality is competitive online games can be stressful especially if the game is difficult and involves something to the effect of a raid mission.
It is certainly understandable and worthy of sympathy if someone who got insulted, replied back with similar rudeness. Common sense tells you you are in the right to defend yourself even in the case of verbal abuse. It's not always possible to get the other individual who did these things to you banned or punished, what if what they did to us happened in an anonymous game chat? then it is nearly impossible to prove it unless a recording via game capture was done.
This is one good example why moderation of social media including gaming platforms suck and almost never work,
obviously we need rules but the problem is those rules don't always get enforced fairly because of flawed methods of reporting as well as moderators who don't investigate things properly. I also know some people who broke the rules or did things that fall into some loophole or grey area and never received a single punishment or warning on the platforms they did these things on. Sometimes I am able to prove it but even then, if they take place in private conversations then I am not exactly going to be allowed to post them in public.
That is the situation in your case: Rules are good but application and documentation of rules are bad {this is a severe problem which should be prevented by moderators/administrators of the respective platform}.
We need rules but also we need a good documentation of rules, also, that rules should be applied in a fair way.
That is the fundamental principle of all rules: They are applied fairly without unjust privileges/restriction. If that principle gets ignored, severe problems arise.
To people who says "It is not cool to repost mods": It is greatly cool and finding it uncool is oppressive, users are free to repost. #DefectiveByDesign #AntiCopyright
I will stay in mostly 1.7.10 and sometimes 1.12.2 until all bad up(!)dates get reverted.
My mod with manually registered ItemBlocks of technical blocks:
What the hell happened to minecraft?#Post6 - My opinions about new up(!)dates since 15w33c.
Of course, repeated displays of disrespecting rules, especially those on harassment should be punished.
In case where someone told another person to leave them alone even if they were swearing, if I were a moderator dealing with this I'd just give that person a stern warning and time to cool off, reminding them that further offensive messages would mean punishments would be needed.
But things like threats or repeated bad messages would obviously mean more severe measures would need to be taken, sometimes perma ban. I don't disagree with this outcome because this is simply done to make a community safer and more inclusive for people. If people don't learn to back off on their own then they should suffer the consequences like everybody else who does it. I just think although this is my opinion, that context or well thought out verdicts on individual cases do matter.
If no harassment is involved and if it's a case of someone posting copyright infringing material, in most cases the correct way to deal with it is to just delete the offending material, block that person from sending links from unofficial sources and remove their privileges on uploading files, problem solved, they cannot upload copyright infringing material if the features that allow it are blocked.
*I was referencing unjust suppression, which is worse than ignoring rule violations, examples:
-User A posted spam, also User B posted spam. If User A gets warning, but User B gets ignored, that is a thing to object wildly
-User 1 requested support for 1.19.3 and got support. User 2 requested support for 1.12.2 and their thread got locked. User 3 have seen what was happening, and created a thread to resist the lock of User 2's thread and provided support to User 2. Therefore, User 3 got a formal warning, User 2 got a informal warning. That is a more typical case of unjust suppression.
The inversion of unjust suppression is equally applied rules, same examples:
-User A posted spam, also User B posted spam. Both of them got an informal warning.
-{similar as the second example} User 2 got proper support from User 3 and nothing bad was happened.
To people who says "It is not cool to repost mods": It is greatly cool and finding it uncool is oppressive, users are free to repost. #DefectiveByDesign #AntiCopyright
I will stay in mostly 1.7.10 and sometimes 1.12.2 until all bad up(!)dates get reverted.
My mod with manually registered ItemBlocks of technical blocks:
What the hell happened to minecraft?#Post6 - My opinions about new up(!)dates since 15w33c.
The main problem is disrespecting other people, not rules. Due to this, most forums has "be respectful to others" rule.
To people who says "It is not cool to repost mods": It is greatly cool and finding it uncool is oppressive, users are free to repost. #DefectiveByDesign #AntiCopyright
I will stay in mostly 1.7.10 and sometimes 1.12.2 until all bad up(!)dates get reverted.
My mod with manually registered ItemBlocks of technical blocks:
What the hell happened to minecraft?#Post6 - My opinions about new up(!)dates since 15w33c.
Sometimes the rules are unreasonable as well, but we still have to follow them. Treating people with respect is good, but sometimes there are other rules in the terms of service which are not only inconvenient but they border on censorship, even if there is a legal issue involved.
Case #1 - A person gets their videos forcibly muted just because of some background music in a video game that came with the game itself, in the worst case scenario, the account gets suspended which can and does happen to people. The sensible thing to do is simply to demonetize the video, if necessary put a disclaimer in the video description or ask the person who uploaded the video to do this.
Case #2 - Swearing, because of people who are overly dramatic people do get silenced for the simple use of swear words, and while it is true that it's not appropriate to let minors hear this, the problem is assuming everyone who uses these platforms are children or that the target audience for the videos are children. If parents don't want minors to hear this in people's podcasts or video game captures, they have the responsibility to deny their child access, it's not the governments job to do this or the private platform owner. People need to learn to take responsibility for their own offspring, unfortunately some people expect other's to do everything for them, which pardon my English for this, makes people weak in character or unwilling to use any initiative. Censorship policies against swearing also make life harder for content creators, whether they are gamers or comedians. We shouldn't be basing our policies around pandering to religious zealots who are offended by everything they disagree with.
Case #3 - we already discussed it in relation to what happened to somebody else, insult in retaliation to somebody else who may have instigated the problem, which is not always possible to prove, or even if it is provable, if these take place in private messages, the act of leaking these messages can sometimes be enough to get the victim suspended. I do think people have a right to privacy, but that doesn't mean I think people should be allowed to abuse the rules of anonymity to cause other's problems, which is exactly the issue going on gaming platforms in anonymous chats and it continues to be a significant problem. Not to mention the loopholes that exist in Code of Conduct when people use other platforms to evade punishment or accountability.