Hey there! I am looking for a friend to play MW3 with on the PS3. My PSN is benster56 and I am a second prestige.
Please respond I live in California in the US so keep that in mind.
Thank You!
This is an alt account. My real account is NONAME148, and that account has been up since 2010. MW3 isn't even MW3 its MW2.5
It is SOO different! Do you even have the game? It has-
1.Different guns
2.Different map design.
3.Different storyline and characters
4.New perks
5.New attachments
6.Way different styled Spec Ops
7. And a WHOLE lot more
Don't judge a game by it's trailer.
It is SOO different! Do you even have the game? It has-
1.Different guns
2.Different map design.
3.Different storyline and characters
4.New perks
5.New attachments
6.Way different styled Spec Ops
7. And a WHOLE lot more
Don't judge a game by it's trailer.
I'm sorry, but I laughed when I read that. Lemme give you my point of view:
1. The new guns are all reskins of other weapons from earlier games that were scrapped from MW3 to make it look like there is genuinely new content. The other half of the selection are reused and the exact same as previous games.
2. The maps are horrid. Unlike even MW2, they have no variety. Mostly set in urban environments, like cities, villages, etc. and no unique maps like Terminal or Rust. They all are also relatively the same big size and in small spaces, which means the same scenarios every match.
3. The storyline is the generic "GO AMERICA!" script we've seen in endless movies & games. It is overly dramatic, and apparently the main characters are all badasses who can only die in slow-motion or by a truly violent method. It also does what many of these kinds of stories do: hide the mistakes of the protagonist nation and make them look like they did a clean job in fighting a war.
4. Most of the perks, like most of the game, are recycled either under a new name or the same title and under a different perk slot. If any of the new perks had any significant impact on the game, then I would've remembered them right now, but I can't even recall the names of them.
5. So you're saying a few new sights & underbarrel attachments are some great reasons to buy a recycled game?
6. The missions are the same: play simple objectives ripped from the campaign. I have to admit, though, the Survival mode is pretty fun. Probably the best part of the game I've played.
Just the way I see it. I still respect personal preference, but I'm just setting this straight.
I'm sorry, but I laughed when I read that. Lemme give you my point of view:
1. The new guns are all reskins of other weapons from earlier games that were scrapped from MW3 to make it look like there is genuinely new content. The other half of the selection are reused and the exact same as previous games.
2. The maps are horrid. Unlike even MW2, they have no variety. Mostly set in urban environments, like cities, villages, etc. and no unique maps like Terminal or Rust. They all are also relatively the same big size and in small spaces, which means the same scenarios every match.
3. The storyline is the generic "GO AMERICA!" script we've seen in endless movies & games. It is overly dramatic, and apparently the main characters are all badasses who can only die in slow-motion or by a truly violent method. It also does what many of these kinds of stories do: hide the mistakes of the protagonist nation and make them look like they did a clean job in fighting a war.
4. Most of the perks, like most of the game, are recycled either under a new name or the same title and under a different perk slot. If any of the new perks had any significant impact on the game, then I would've remembered them right now, but I can't even recall the names of them.
Meh. To productive to read your long, meaningless post about a game. Btw the game is still fun and there are actually a lot of new(and strange) guns. :smile.gif:. So stop wasting your time.
5. So you're saying a few new sights & underbarrel attachments are some great reasons to buy a recycled game?
6. The missions are the same: play simple objectives ripped from the campaign. I have to admit, though, the Survival mode is pretty fun. Probably the best part of the game I've played.
Just the way I see it. I still respect personal preference, but I'm just setting this straight.
I'm sorry, I wasn't wasting my time, I was trying to persuade victims of Activision, such as yourself, to think twice about this repetitive, unbalanced game. Unfortunately, it seems it hasn't gone through your mind because you're too "productive" to read my statement, even though it's clear you're just another fanboy because you had enough time to reply to my statement (and fail at formatting it properly...). Along with the fact that you also didn't read the part where I explain the guns.
****ing think before you attempt a "tough guy" comment.
Please respond I live in California in the US so keep that in mind.
Thank You!
"We give you quality block by block by block.....". Please check out link!
Minecraft is not the only good game you know, and I see you are a newb to minecraft.
Please shut up.
"We give you quality block by block by block.....". Please check out link!
This is an alt account. My real account is NONAME148, and that account has been up since 2010. MW3 isn't even MW3 its MW2.5
It is SOO different! Do you even have the game? It has-
1.Different guns
2.Different map design.
3.Different storyline and characters
4.New perks
5.New attachments
6.Way different styled Spec Ops
7. And a WHOLE lot more
Don't judge a game by it's trailer.
Cool! I will send you a friend request soon. Maybe tommorow. What times do you play and what state do you live in?
"We give you quality block by block by block.....". Please check out link!
I'm sorry, but I laughed when I read that. Lemme give you my point of view:
1. The new guns are all reskins of other weapons from earlier games that were scrapped from MW3 to make it look like there is genuinely new content. The other half of the selection are reused and the exact same as previous games.
2. The maps are horrid. Unlike even MW2, they have no variety. Mostly set in urban environments, like cities, villages, etc. and no unique maps like Terminal or Rust. They all are also relatively the same big size and in small spaces, which means the same scenarios every match.
3. The storyline is the generic "GO AMERICA!" script we've seen in endless movies & games. It is overly dramatic, and apparently the main characters are all badasses who can only die in slow-motion or by a truly violent method. It also does what many of these kinds of stories do: hide the mistakes of the protagonist nation and make them look like they did a clean job in fighting a war.
4. Most of the perks, like most of the game, are recycled either under a new name or the same title and under a different perk slot. If any of the new perks had any significant impact on the game, then I would've remembered them right now, but I can't even recall the names of them.
5. So you're saying a few new sights & underbarrel attachments are some great reasons to buy a recycled game?
6. The missions are the same: play simple objectives ripped from the campaign. I have to admit, though, the Survival mode is pretty fun. Probably the best part of the game I've played.
Just the way I see it. I still respect personal preference, but I'm just setting this straight.
Hey, are you the guy from happy wheels? Because I love your levels if you are.
"We give you quality block by block by block.....". Please check out link!
I'm sorry, I wasn't wasting my time, I was trying to persuade victims of Activision, such as yourself, to think twice about this repetitive, unbalanced game. Unfortunately, it seems it hasn't gone through your mind because you're too "productive" to read my statement, even though it's clear you're just another fanboy because you had enough time to reply to my statement (and fail at formatting it properly...). Along with the fact that you also didn't read the part where I explain the guns.
****ing think before you attempt a "tough guy" comment.