“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” — Albert Einstein
"Never try to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and it annoys the pig." — Robert Heinlein
To be honest, I don't actually think it's worth it to keep that processor seeing how much the motherboards cost. Like Razeredge said, you can get like an i5 2500k and a new motherboard for around $350. It will cost you around $200 just to get a good LGA 1336 motherboard. Even though you got the processor very cheap, you will have to pay a pretty penny for a motherboard unless you can find a good deal on a used one from eBay or something. Just thought I'd give my opinion on the subject.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from TheFieldZy »
Nobody's perfect, so neither is Hannah Montana Linux, but it's pretty great.
Quote from BC_Programming on Operating Systems »
They all suck. They just suck differently. Sort of like prostitutes.
The advantages are that if you're processor is a bottleneck or just not running as fast as you would like, it will speed things up. The disadvantage is that your processor will use more power and produce more heat. That's why I asked because if you will overclock then you will want a motherboard with good cooling on it. I guess it doesn't really matter though since pretty much any of the motherboards you can still buy for that processor will be good at overclocking.
I would suggest getting this motherboard: http://us.ncix.com/p...acture=Gigabyte
It's $165 so it's only about $30 more than what a normal motherboard for a newer processor would cost and it appears to have very good cooling on it as well as plenty of expansion slots.
The 920 rig I have downstairs really doesn't overclock well. The 920 has a locked multiplier, so you really can't do much for overclocking asides from adjusting the BCLK, which makes a lot of stuff on the board unstable.