If you have a good computer, go FF, but just remember, FF is a resource HOG (compared to others). I would try pale moon, it is a windows optimized version of FF...I love it
For the last time, firefox is not a resource hog, as stated multiple times in the thread.
I say Chrome. Chrome is sleek, straightforward, fast, organized, and simple. If you want something that is easy and don't care about plugins or toolbars or other, you should use it.
Again, chrome doesn't load pages faster, rather, it loads assets as the page is downloaded, unlike firefox, which only displays the page once all the formatting is downloaded. They are both the same speed.
Notice, I said display, not load. I read your earlier post on that.
I have 1 down and .2 up and it loads in under a second.
Same here and I'm connected via a wireless g usb adapter. I don't understand how people get their computers to run sooo slow on the simplest of things.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from TheFieldZy »
Nobody's perfect, so neither is Hannah Montana Linux, but it's pretty great.
Quote from BC_Programming on Operating Systems »
They all suck. They just suck differently. Sort of like prostitutes.
Same here and I'm connected via a wireless g usb adapter. I don't understand how people get their computers to run sooo slow on the simplest of things.
mine could simply be because two other siblings are streaming netflix right now
Oh don't me wrong I don't think Chrome is very good. Their developers are arrogant and don't have the slightest concern for the usability of their product if it conflicts with their ideology or corporate policy or w/e
Chrome is faster to use, even though FF technically loads the whole page faster. Because if you are quickly flipping through sites, you just want enough to load to click the link you want, just the top to load, because that is all you want to see. With FF you have to wait for the whole page to load, which really slows me down. I am trying waterfox, and so far I am having more stuttering and hangups that I did with chrome.
MS Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit | AMD Athlon II X4 635 | 4.00 GB Dual-Channel DDR3 | BIOSTAR Group A880GU3 | ASUS VH238 | 1024MB GeForce GTX 550 Ti (Gigabyte) | 313GB Western Digital WDC WD3200AAJB-00J3A0 | TSSTcorp CDW/DVD TS-H492A | Realtek High Definition Audio
Well I'm glad they're working on it I use firefox as my default browser
There are multiple things I don't like about Chrome, the snappy UI is the only thing I like really.
If you want more information on it here.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Electrolysis
It is not super high on Mozilla list of things to do but work is being done.
Lies.
i5 6600k 4.6ghz / MSI 280X / 8Gb 2666 DDR4 / Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 / TX550M / 500Gb 850 EVO / NZXT S340 / Corsair K65 / Corsair M60
And yet they can't get the simple things right:
Notice, I said display, not load. I read your earlier post on that.
Sounds like your computer is slow as crap or your internet is.
I have 1 down and .2 up and it loads in under a second.
Same here and I'm connected via a wireless g usb adapter. I don't understand how people get their computers to run sooo slow on the simplest of things.
Oh don't me wrong I don't think Chrome is very good. Their developers are arrogant and don't have the slightest concern for the usability of their product if it conflicts with their ideology or corporate policy or w/e
i5 6600k 4.6ghz / MSI 280X / 8Gb 2666 DDR4 / Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 / TX550M / 500Gb 850 EVO / NZXT S340 / Corsair K65 / Corsair M60