lol what are u smoking?? GHz is prolly the single biggest factor in determining a CPU's performance.
and to the OP id reccomend u get a better CPU, 2GHz kinda sucks...
GHZ is crap for measuring the speed of a processor for many reasons First of all Bulldozer at 4.5ghz can't beat a 3.3ghz I5. Second of all modern processors have turbo so what they sit at standard means nothing.
lol what are u smoking?? GHz is prolly the single biggest factor in determining a CPU's performance.
and to the OP id reccomend u get a better CPU, 2GHz kinda sucks...
You shouldn't compare Ghz with other processors. For example, a Core I3 clocked at 1.8 Ghz can slap around a Pentium at 3.2 Ghz. You should compare benchmarks, not ghz.
GHZ is crap for measuring the speed of a processor for many reasons First of all Bulldozer at 4.5ghz can't beat a 3.3ghz I5. Second of all modern processors have turbo so what they sit at standard means nothing.
You shouldn't compare Ghz with other processors. For example, a Core I3 clocked at 1.8 Ghz can slap around a Pentium at 3.2 Ghz. You should compare benchmarks, not ghz.
If you don't know, don't post.
No it isn't, GHz means next to nothing, same with number of cores.
Your statement makes no sense. The i5 at any speed is a damn good CPU, GHz means absolutely nothing.
IF YOU DON'T KNOW, DON'T POST.