it may not be high end (high end being the best of the best technology you can get for your computer) but it looks like it'll kick ass while you're gaming
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
GENERATION 18: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
GHz dont matter. Pentium 4 vs Athlon 64 for example.
GHz does matter within the same architecture of processors. Also most people here probably weren't gaming during the time of the Pentium 4 and the Athlon 64. Bulldozer and Sandy bridge is a much better example
GHz does matter within the same architecture of processors. Also most people here probably weren't gaming during the time of the Pentium 4 and the Athlon 64. Bulldozer and Sandy bridge is a much better example
did he say what the cpu actually was? Because if not than 2.4ghz on a quadcore could be just fine. but at any rate, that gpu kills it, plus who ever heard of 5 GB of Ram?
did he say what the cpu actually was? Because if not than 2.4ghz on a quadcore could be just fine. but at any rate, that gpu kills it, plus who ever heard of 5 GB of Ram?
Random example that makes no sense
What if its 2.4ghz Bulldozer quad core.
Your PC isn't high-end -- not compared to today's standards -- but it's not bad. I would say it's mid-level. You can play a handful of games, such as Crysis 2, with medium to high settings.
There's no way that he can run Crysis on high with that. I don't think that could even run Starcraft on low.
You must be the most bitter brony I've ever seen. Odd, you're usually such a nice group.
The computer isn't high end, but it's not too bad. To be honest, very high end computers are wasted resources for most users. That computer could use some upgrades, but it depends on what it's being used for.
If any senator wishes to read this, I suggest a SUSA bill. Stop United States Act. If the internet needs to babysit your lawmaking, Then there's something wrong.
2.4Ghz X 4. (Intel)
1080p Monitor.
250GB X 2 of hard drive space.
Windows 7.
5GB ram.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse PremiumNo. That would be a very low end computer.
It would have been mid-range when it was new back in 2006, like my current computer in my signature.
You should be able to run games fine, but don't expect anything amazing out of it.
it may not be high end (high end being the best of the best technology you can get for your computer) but it looks like it'll kick ass while you're gaming
GHz dont matter. Pentium 4 vs Athlon 64 for example.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse PremiumGHz does matter within the same architecture of processors. Also most people here probably weren't gaming during the time of the Pentium 4 and the Athlon 64. Bulldozer and Sandy bridge is a much better example
did he say what the cpu actually was? Because if not than 2.4ghz on a quadcore could be just fine. but at any rate, that gpu kills it, plus who ever heard of 5 GB of Ram?
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse PremiumRandom example that makes no sense
What if its 2.4ghz Bulldozer quad core.
He does need to state what CPU it is.
Intel
That's the manufacturer.
What's the model of the CPU?
Q6600
The whole entire PC is ancient.
Even in 2008 or whatever, it wouldn't have been high end. Now, it's a dinosaur.
It can run crysis 2 without lag...
Recommended ?
Cheers!
wat
the
****
are
you
smoking?
There's no way that he can run Crysis on high with that. I don't think that could even run Starcraft on low.
You must be the most bitter brony I've ever seen. Odd, you're usually such a nice group.
The computer isn't high end, but it's not too bad. To be honest, very high end computers are wasted resources for most users. That computer could use some upgrades, but it depends on what it's being used for.
LOL yeah you must be insane