Minecraft Forums

I average 320ish on full-fancy-smooth.

Minimum settings and looking at the sky I'm way over 3000

Fast with far render gives me about 16 FPS. Fast with tiny render gives me about 70.

My stupid toaster can only handle 1-20 on fast and short.
But when I look at the sky, it friggin' skyrockets.
Hopefully this will change come July 25th.

Sometimes I drop to 100, need an upgrade.

Not to brag or anything, but I usually get over 200 if I'm at ground level. However, I've built my little kingdom on various floating land masses so usually I'm high up in the sky resulting in me getting only about 61-80 FPS since I'm like rendering a lot more of the world and stuff. And when I'm underground I get close to like 300 FPS.

I get 80-300 most of the time.

20 average
30 if it's having a good day
10 when venturing
<5 when in my very dense tree farm. (srsly, Notch needs to fix fast graphics leaf rendering.)
All on small, fast, smooth.

Quote from l0ngcatisl0ng »

Not to brag or anything

You're not.

Quote from TheAnswer42 »

What.

I thought I was doing okay at 20 fps.

What the hell computers are you people using?

umm desktops, as opposed to laptops?

I get anything from 2 to 90. But average is about 20 or so. I hate it when people complain about like 50 fps when i only get that on GOOD days.

I usually do far-fancy-smooth and get about 20-30. Lately I average around 15. :sad.gif:

I get normally around 30-70FPS (with a 32x32 edition of default textures named Faithful textures and smooth lights on and far render and fancy.)

I tried doing tiny, fast, smooth light off and turning on flight and going up until i just see all white/black and I get 750fps.

I did tiny, fast, and smooth light off and went to the castle with lava moat around it and got 611fps as you can see below.



(all of the above was done with Faithful 32x32 texture pack.

My system specs are
3.2GHz Phenom2 x6 1090T
12GB of ram
NvidiaGTS250 (1 card, running dual monitors)
1TB harddrive (normal 7,200RPM one)
Windows 7 x64bit.

P.S. reason for high ram, I like doing some photoshop work and multiboxing games (e.g. 2-3 Beta clients and 1 classic client at the same time, I get 20-40FPS on each client when doing this.)

I get about 120 on tiny and fast, and i get like 12 on far, fast

15-30 on windows

about 125 on Ubuntu while standing still, but it drops to about 85 when I am moving around a lot.

both are using a 5 year old laptop. Linux-gnu helps a lot,

100-130. I use windows.

I actually need an upgrade, my graphics card is bottlenecked. :tongue.gif:

But that's my desktop, on my craptop (see what i did there) i get about 30-ish max. Probably gonna install Optimine.

It sounds like the only point of this post is so the guy can brag that he has 350 fps. I have 40-50, and I'm pretty proud of it for a laptop. Besides, do you really need fps that moves faster than lighting?

Just to put the information out there, the human eye perceives visual input at ~30-34 fps.

With this said, any of you sitting on 30+ fps on average are doing perfectly fine, and have nothing to worry about. I average 80-90 with a few mods, a 64x64 texture pack, far render distance, with few chunk updates. Of course, when I put it on tiny, fast, default texture pack, remove my mods, and look up into the sky, I can get 600-700 fps.

But who ^ wants that? 30 fps is excellent enough. With my older computer, it would average 15, and that was a terrible situation. Glad I don't notice lag anymore :smile.gif:

Max is like 50 on Tiny and Fast, normally about 30.

174, everything turned up, moving with a bit of mobs in my dark room, near my lava grinder.

45-49fps while loading chunks. 30-38fps while generating chunks at speedx12+flying. 48-60 while in loaded chunks.

x8 anisotropic filtering, x16 antialiasing, x8 supersampling. World curvature and depth of field shaders. Original textures. Far, fancy, smooth lighting makes no difference. 1920x1080