My idea is there should be a atlas item added to minecraft. It would be crafted like so: ]The string is for the bind and the leather is for the front and back covers. The atlas can hold up to 5 maps. In the atlas you can choose for it just to be like a book and hold your maps or make all your maps into 1 giant map ( holes between the 5 maps will just be black) as in holes I mean if you take 1 map and make it on the other side of the world you wont get almost infinite free map space. In the GUI it has five slots and a check box that says (make giant map) and you check it if you want it and not if you don't. It can be a way to not have to carry a lot of maps around on a long journey or make a large map so you don't need 5 to see your whole area. Constructively criticize and support away1
1) Why 5? Prime numbers are kind of out of place in Minecraft.
4, 6, or 9 would look better for a whole map, though the idea of a single oversized map isn't very appealing itself. It would either take up too much of the screen, require too much detail, or I'm not sure what else.
The idea of an atlas isn't all bad though, and I'm all for space saving. Maybe if it just held multiple maps and just showed the one you were in.
Remove the five map limit. Make each map a page instead of one giant map and then your on to something.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Humanity is the creation of Logic and Emotion, Calculation and Imagination, Cold Analysis and Blind Faith. This is why I believe it is a strange Human that would prize one while shunning the other. For a calculator can do math just as well as you, but a calculator can not use math to make the world a better place.
4, 6, or 9 would look better for a whole map, though the idea of a single oversized map isn't very appealing itself. It would either take up too much of the screen, require too much detail, or I'm not sure what else.
The idea of an atlas isn't all bad though, and I'm all for space saving. Maybe if it just held multiple maps and just showed the one you were in.
Hence...
Now how is this OP?
I simply think it might be very hard to implement from a coding standpoint.