can you believe mojang had the audacity to add this to the game and remove it?
they didn't remove the april fools chest.
that was so rude.
They said several times that is was noticeably buggy, especially with transparencies, and it didn't render light like the suggestion.
Also, the Locked Chest was in the same .jar as normal Minecraft, Minecraft 2.0 was three separate .jars
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
[quote=Badgerz]You have to keep in mind that people are stupid.
[quote=Catelite]Just because you don't understand how something works, doesn't make it broken or pointless. >_<
Wonderful! Imagine all the possibilities this could add to medieval structures! And the colored light! That could be a way to do transparent pixel art! Supported!
I think it is funny how so many people attribute a low frame rate with lag....while the two have nothing to do with each other...
I find it amusing how so many people confuse the term 'lag' with 'latency', then attempt to correct others on its usage. Latency specifically refers to client-server connection, while lag is an acceptable term to describe any sort of 'falling behind'.
The issue is that it has to be compatible with the current lighting system (which uses a .png for night/day lighting,) because the old system was murder on lower end machines at dusk/dawn.
My cousins and I make mods. But this is a LOT of programming and coding stuff.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
O This is my version of Bob. He's lost in Minecraft Forums and want to take down Google+ on YouTube.
/[]\ Help Him get out of here before Google+ wins to invade YouTube.
/\
by the way, my cousins will try to make a test (pretty sure they will fail) because my work is to make the textures but minecraft provided it for them.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
O This is my version of Bob. He's lost in Minecraft Forums and want to take down Google+ on YouTube.
/[]\ Help Him get out of here before Google+ wins to invade YouTube.
/\
Aaww maan! Now Mojang tells us a community-feature will be added to the next update, and I am torn asunder whether I should hold my thumbs for this suggestion or Cubic chunks! T_T
I find it amusing how so many people confuse the term 'lag' with 'latency', then attempt to correct others on its usage. Latency specifically refers to client-server connection, while lag is an acceptable term to describe any sort of 'falling behind'.
The issue is that it has to be compatible with the current lighting system (which uses a .png for night/day lighting,) because the old system was murder on lower end machines at dusk/dawn.
Darn you inconsistency! Darn those parents who refuse to improve their technology! lol
They said several times that is was noticeably buggy, especially with transparencies, and it didn't render light like the suggestion.
Also, the Locked Chest was in the same .jar as normal Minecraft, Minecraft 2.0 was three separate .jars
[quote=Badgerz]You have to keep in mind that people are stupid.
[quote=Catelite]Just because you don't understand how something works, doesn't make it broken or pointless. >_<
An alternate timeline emerges.
However, we must first start from the beginning...
Meow. I'm Thorolf the Cat.
The issue is that it has to be compatible with the current lighting system (which uses a .png for night/day lighting,) because the old system was murder on lower end machines at dusk/dawn.
Mostly moved on. May check back a few times a year.
/[]\ Help Him get out of here before Google+ wins to invade YouTube.
/\
/[]\ Help Him get out of here before Google+ wins to invade YouTube.
/\
~Epic Space Milk Muffin
Adventure map heaven.
Avatar: "Badass" playermodel from Garry's Mod addon Metropolice Pack
corgiorgy.com
I support.
And then rebuild them after the creepers stop by...