Sure, if you are using an HD texture pack, then you would already use MCPatcher or Optifine and the problem won't exist. But not everyone wants to use an HD texture pack, and some computers may even be so old to not be able to run one. So those people would have to install MCPatcher JUST for the swamps... I don't think that's really a good solution. See CreatorWorks' post above mine for a better solution.
I'm pretty sure that they're fixing it but just because of color it can wait unless they can fix it in a short time.
honestly I want more features and bug fixes rather then this...
plus I don't notice this in mah worlds : o and I think they are fixing it though soon. : D
If you look at update news for 1.1 it says SLIGHTLY smoothed it. : D
wich means they know they didn't finish smoothing it but it looks slightly better. : D
Yah swamps are fine and all (even if it seems like i always spawn in them when starting a new map :tongue.gif:) but they need to be "beautified a little more so they can fit in. Just what I think
One way or another, I still don't care. This game wasn't designed to look good. It's 16x16 pixel blocks, for crying out loud! Not exactly the most stunning graphics. If you want a beautiful game, go play something like BF3 or Rage. I can't believe you people actually expect "Beutiful swamps" from a game like this!
If Facebook, Myspace, and Twitter were all destroyed, 99% of teens would go insane. If you're one of the 1% that would be laughing at them, copy this into your signature and hope it happens.
One way or another, I still don't care. This game wasn't designed to look good. It's 16x16 pixel blocks, for crying out loud! Not exactly the most stunning graphics. If you want a beautiful game, go at something like BF3 or Rage. I can't believe you people actually expect "Beutiful swamps" from a game like this!
Low fidelity does not always mean low quality. Minecraft went for a pixellated blocky aesthetic, and still managed to create beautiful landscapes with it.
And in any case, the point is not for them to make the swamps look good, the point is for them to let us make them look good, if we choose to, with texture packs.
GENERATION 9002: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment http://www.youtube.com/user/sidorakh
Read for ****'s sake, people. It's not fixed.
Mostly moved on. May check back a few times a year.
100% editable
Smooth transitions
All you need is mcpatcher.
That's a mod. We want it editable in vanilla, unmodded minecraft.
I'm pretty sure that they're fixing it but just because of color it can wait unless they can fix it in a short time.
honestly I want more features and bug fixes rather then this...
plus I don't notice this in mah worlds : o and I think they are fixing it though soon. : D
If you look at update news for 1.1 it says SLIGHTLY smoothed it. : D
wich means they know they didn't finish smoothing it but it looks slightly better. : D
/signed
Ever been to the Everglades?
Read first, then comment.
/signed
http://www.youtube.com/user/pancakesimone
Low fidelity does not always mean low quality. Minecraft went for a pixellated blocky aesthetic, and still managed to create beautiful landscapes with it.
And in any case, the point is not for them to make the swamps look good, the point is for them to let us make them look good, if we choose to, with texture packs.
http://www.youtube.com/user/sidorakh
Also, I'd appreciate it if they were less flat.
The swamps only look fine if you are looking at the swamps themselves, instead of the transition to the swamps.