I have read many comments on Realism threads and they always get mixed reviews. Here's how to sum it up :biggrin.gif:
1. does the thread contain an inventory idea? (Y/N)
2. is it a balanced idea, so that it's not too OP or too UP? (Y/N)
3. Would it mess with the game? (Y/N)
4. If it did, was it in a good way? (Y/N)
5. Does it involve crafting? (Y/N)
6. is it balanced so that it's not too OP or too UP? (Y/N)
7. Would it mess with the game? (Y/N)
8. If it did, was it in a good way? (Y/N)
9. Does it involve creatures? (Y/N)
10. is it balanced so that the [creature] is not too OP or UP? (Y/N)
11. Would it mess with the game? (Y/N)
12. If it did, was it in a good way? (Y/N)
If it contained an inventory idea, thats - no points + no points.
If it is a balanced idea, +1 point. If it isn't, -1.
If it messed with the game, -1 and +1 (no loss.)
If it was in a good way, +1 or not, -1
Did it involve crafting? no points lost or earned.
if it was balanced, +1 point. If it isn't, -1 point.
if it messed with the game -1 and +1 (no loss.)
if it was in a good way, +1 or if not -1.
Did it involve creatures? if so, no points lost or earned.
if it was balanced, +1 point. if it isn't, -1 point.
if it messed with the game +1 and -1 (no loss)
if it messed with it in a good way, +1 if not, -1.
The spoilers are his personal guidelines to rating realism-based suggestions. I think he wants us to review those threads.
But where's the SUGGESTION?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Hypothetical: You read a thread in the Suggestions forum. You suddenly realize you've seen the idea before. Maybe it's a duplicate? No. Maybe it's just you? No. Maybe it's been done already? Very likely: Click here if there's a mod for that.
Well, I guess I'm smert. I'll go call my Smert friends and we'll all read this in an incredibly smert manner that is seriously very smert. I'm so smert, I once won a contest for being the Smertest. I'm not kidding! I'm that smert.
.... But seriously, where the smert is the suggestion?
1. does the thread contain an inventory idea? (Y/N)
2. is it a balanced idea, so that it's not too OP or too UP? (Y/N)
3. Would it mess with the game? (Y/N)
4. If it did, was it in a good way? (Y/N)
5. Does it involve crafting? (Y/N)
6. is it balanced so that it's not too OP or too UP? (Y/N)
7. Would it mess with the game? (Y/N)
8. If it did, was it in a good way? (Y/N)
9. Does it involve creatures? (Y/N)
10. is it balanced so that the [creature] is not too OP or UP? (Y/N)
11. Would it mess with the game? (Y/N)
12. If it did, was it in a good way? (Y/N)
If it contained an inventory idea, thats - no points + no points.
If it is a balanced idea, +1 point. If it isn't, -1.
If it messed with the game, -1 and +1 (no loss.)
If it was in a good way, +1 or not, -1
Did it involve crafting? no points lost or earned.
if it was balanced, +1 point. If it isn't, -1 point.
if it messed with the game -1 and +1 (no loss.)
if it was in a good way, +1 or if not -1.
Did it involve creatures? if so, no points lost or earned.
if it was balanced, +1 point. if it isn't, -1 point.
if it messed with the game +1 and -1 (no loss)
if it messed with it in a good way, +1 if not, -1.
Current topic(s) to review: (show in points)
Realism Inventory Idea (TMN)
Food Spoilage (The Phantom Potato)
BBCode Render failed due to reaching MaxNestingDepth(80) for Tag: spoiler
Did you even take the chance to read the spoilers?
Its just that I can't take this seriously with your "smert" caps thing you got going on.
Oh, and this is overly complicated. I don't want to have to refer to a list to make sure if I like something or not.
BBCode Render failed due to reaching MaxNestingDepth(80) for Tag: spoiler
Why do we need a reviewing section? Because it helps people know what threads are the best.
But where's the SUGGESTION?
I'll add that.. actually, move this please. Move this to the moon.
.... But seriously, where the smert is the suggestion?
Checking already gives you 25% addiction.
but topic on complicated over is it suggestion no.
By the way, just because you have your own set of guidelines doesn't mean we need to follow them.