The Meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything.
Join Date:
12/23/2013
Posts:
351
Location:
In front of my PC
Minecraft:
Ramis2356
Member Details
Thanks for the support guys!
I still don't get why people are saying "That would be stupid coz it wouldn't increase damage!" When I wrote Damage rate will not change, just the appearance.on the main post...?
Not sure where all the negativity spews from either; generally those who do downvote this suggestion don't really have a reason (good or bad) to reject support.
Not sure where all the negativity spews from either; generally those who do downvote this suggestion don't really have a reason (good or bad) to reject support.
It's hard to find a 'good reason' to downvote a purely aesthetic item. I have my own personal rules as to what constitutes a good aesthetic addition, but I'm not going to hold anyone to my rules.
You could, just don't go demanding people to use it.
Support is a very dubious notion; it's nice to have more support than negativity; but it simply could be you're looking at different factions of the same vocal minority. Still, if you DO make a banner, don't go announcing it in your thread title or red flagging it. Simply add it, and let it be.
Support. We need more aesthetics. I see no reason why this is getting negativity. Just because it looks like a diamond sword doesn't mean it is a diamond sword.
Yes, Thankyou. That's what I'm keep telling other people. XD
The Meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything.
Join Date:
5/12/2012
Posts:
86
Location:
The End
Minecraft:
xLexi
Member Details
- Support Denied
The only use I saw in this was the multiplayer game suggestion for colored team swords, however I don't see this making it into the game outside of a simple mod. I say this mainly because who uses wooden swords for longer than the first few minutes to an hour of gameplay? o_o Stone is relatively easier to acquire, and wood is the lowest of the low. It just seems rather silly to acquire dye (much more "high end" to acquire material) and apply to something as lowly as a wooden sword, which depletes rather quickly.
I'm all for aesthetics, but more-so on things that will last / matter more than a wooden sword.
The only use I saw in this was the multiplayer game suggestion for colored team swords, however I don't see this making it into the game outside of a simple mod. I say this mainly because who uses wooden swords for longer than the first few minutes to an hour of gameplay? o_o Stone is relatively easier to acquire, and wood is the lowest of the low. It just seems rather silly to acquire dye (much more "high end" to acquire material) and apply to something as lowly as a wooden sword, which depletes rather quickly.
I'm all for aesthetics, but more-so on things that will last / matter more than a wooden sword.
As I said countless time that this suggestion simply is not suitable for vanilla survival. Just think about how much "dyed leather armor" is used when its the "weakest" armor in minecraft. The thing your saying about how wooden swords are useless in minecraft is true, as I didn't even craft a "wooden sword" and went straight to "stone sword". BUT this is only in "Vanilla Survival". This feature could be used in maps and servers, similar ways to how "dyed leather armor" are used. Plus, think about painting a stone-sword or a wooden-sword in real life. witch will be easier?
Diamond swords aren't very powerful anyway, so it shouldn't really discourage a person with iron gear from attacking them. If anything, it would probably make me more likely to attack them.
I saw your amethyst thread, and I say support for it and this.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I just took the Minecraft Noob test! Check out what I scored. Think you can beat me?!
To everyone saying about how bad it is because all it adds is aesthetics, then why was dye-able leather armor added? Aesthetics! And we all like that? Why not this then? It's practically the same thing, with a sword!
I still don't get why people are saying "That would be stupid coz it wouldn't increase damage!" When I wrote Damage rate will not change, just the appearance. on the main post...?
Thanks for the Support!
OFFICIAL POSTING/REPLYING GUIDELINES
UNOFFICIAL POSTING GUIDE (PRT)
UNOFFICIAL REPLYING GUIDE (FTC)
It's hard to find a 'good reason' to downvote a purely aesthetic item. I have my own personal rules as to what constitutes a good aesthetic addition, but I'm not going to hold anyone to my rules.
If you are planning to make a suggestion, please read this.
If you want to know more, you can read this.
For those who complain about post-Beta generation, you might want to see this.
Check out my youtube series!
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwbCPoffphygwz1HEHLYSR0lt9E80HvxW
Please click or they will die!
Since there's 35+ Supporters, should I make a banner? Should I? Would anyone use it?
Support is a very dubious notion; it's nice to have more support than negativity; but it simply could be you're looking at different factions of the same vocal minority. Still, if you DO make a banner, don't go announcing it in your thread title or red flagging it. Simply add it, and let it be.
OFFICIAL POSTING/REPLYING GUIDELINES
UNOFFICIAL POSTING GUIDE (PRT)
UNOFFICIAL REPLYING GUIDE (FTC)
Yes, Thankyou. That's what I'm keep telling other people. XD
By the magic of art I present this banner:
Paste into sig (remove spaces:
The only use I saw in this was the multiplayer game suggestion for colored team swords, however I don't see this making it into the game outside of a simple mod. I say this mainly because who uses wooden swords for longer than the first few minutes to an hour of gameplay? o_o Stone is relatively easier to acquire, and wood is the lowest of the low. It just seems rather silly to acquire dye (much more "high end" to acquire material) and apply to something as lowly as a wooden sword, which depletes rather quickly.
I'm all for aesthetics, but more-so on things that will last / matter more than a wooden sword.
By the magic of art I present this banner:
Thankyou so much! I'll put this on the main post
As I said countless time that this suggestion simply is not suitable for vanilla survival. Just think about how much "dyed leather armor" is used when its the "weakest" armor in minecraft. The thing your saying about how wooden swords are useless in minecraft is true, as I didn't even craft a "wooden sword" and went straight to "stone sword". BUT this is only in "Vanilla Survival". This feature could be used in maps and servers, similar ways to how "dyed leather armor" are used. Plus, think about painting a stone-sword or a wooden-sword in real life. witch will be easier?
that would make it better than a diamond sword
And you're point is? You're discussing features that are already in the game; OP has no control over that and shouldn't be judged off these merits.
OFFICIAL POSTING/REPLYING GUIDELINES
UNOFFICIAL POSTING GUIDE (PRT)
UNOFFICIAL REPLYING GUIDE (FTC)
I saw your amethyst thread, and I say support for it and this.
I just took the Minecraft Noob test! Check out what I scored. Think you can beat me?!
To take the test, check out
https://minecraftnoobtest.com/test.php
Don't click this link, HE is haunting it...
To everyone saying about how bad it is because all it adds is aesthetics, then why was dye-able leather armor added? Aesthetics! And we all like that? Why not this then? It's practically the same thing, with a sword!
I fine with this.
I would give more options for map builders and fit in well with everything survival-wise.
Use this and pretend the sword is red. Tell me if it doesn't work. You can use this, if this idea comes out.
SUPPORT
Wow... That's a long command.... I'll
typepaste it into a command-block and see what happens.