So, the only way to make the game partially decent is to remove half the freaking game and completely break the other half.
What you'd end up with is a laggy piece of crap, where you run around in a world until you starve to death or fall off a cliff. There would be literally nothing to achieve.
You know, this reminds me of one game. Dunno what it was called, but it was some movie game on the Atari which almost single-handedly destroyed gaming. I also recall every copy the developer still had was crushed, covered in cement, and buried in a landfill.
"Science isn't a matter of WHY, it's a matter of WHY NOT? WHY is so much of our science dangerous? Why don't you marry safe science if you love it so much? In fact, why don't you invent a special safety door that won't slam you in the butt on your way out? BECAUSE YOU ARE FIRED!" -Cave Johnson
I guarantee if Minecraft became more realistic, Minecraft would be more popular than COD and Skyrim.
i couldn't care less how popular it is. as far as i'm concerned, COD and Skyrim suck and are overrated. minecraft has always had a certain appeal to making the game whatever you want it to be, realism gets in the way that vision.
So, the only way to make the game partially decent is to remove half the freaking game and completely break the other half.
What you'd end up with is a laggy piece of crap, where you run around in a world until you starve to death or fall off a cliff. There would be literally nothing to achieve.
You know, this reminds me of one game. Dunno what it was called, but it was some movie game on the Atari which almost single-handedly destroyed gaming. I also recall every copy the developer still had was crushed, covered in cement, and buried in a landfill.
That's cuz they did it wrong.
I have full faith in the Minecraft dev team that they can make a much more realistic game, and make it kick booty.
So, the only way to make the game partially decent is to remove half the freaking game and completely break the other half.
What you'd end up with is a laggy piece of crap, where you run around in a world until you starve to death or fall off a cliff. There would be literally nothing to achieve.
You know, this reminds me of one game. Dunno what it was called, but it was some movie game on the Atari which almost single-handedly destroyed gaming. I also recall every copy the developer still had was crushed, covered in cement, and buried in a landfill.
That would be E.T. the videogame, circa 1982
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
A wise person once said: "Offense is never given, only taken."
Oh great, another thread on "minecraft isn't realistic". All this does is start forum wars. It's a game, it wasn't meant to be realistic, it's called ENTERTAINMENT! Case closed.
That's cuz they did it wrong.
I have full faith in the Minecraft dev team that they can make a much more realistic game, and make it kick booty.
I've got a challenge for you.
Describe what the first 5 steps would be in a version of Minecraft, where design is irrelevant and realism is the only (and i mean ONLY) focus. Oh, and you start with no items.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Science isn't a matter of WHY, it's a matter of WHY NOT? WHY is so much of our science dangerous? Why don't you marry safe science if you love it so much? In fact, why don't you invent a special safety door that won't slam you in the butt on your way out? BECAUSE YOU ARE FIRED!" -Cave Johnson
Isn't a copy of that worth a small fortune nowadays? Do to the fact that only a handful of them escaped the genocide the devs committed on their own product.
On a side note: Why couldn't Duke Nukem Forever suffer the same fate as the E.T. game?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Humanity is the creation of Logic and Emotion, Calculation and Imagination, Cold Analysis and Blind Faith. This is why I believe it is a strange Human that would prize one while shunning the other. For a calculator can do math just as well as you, but a calculator can not use math to make the world a better place.
On a side note: Why couldn't Duke Nukem Forever suffer the same fate as the E.T. game?
Because Duke Nukem actually bears a vague resemblance to a proper game.
But we aren't discussing ET or Duke Nukem here.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Science isn't a matter of WHY, it's a matter of WHY NOT? WHY is so much of our science dangerous? Why don't you marry safe science if you love it so much? In fact, why don't you invent a special safety door that won't slam you in the butt on your way out? BECAUSE YOU ARE FIRED!" -Cave Johnson
Hey ladyagag, if you don't like the game, the guess what? Don't play the game!!! Simple as that!!! Instead you guys insist on starting wars!
These threads aren't even skirmishes. You wan't to see a war? Go look at the terrain threads that crop up. Or one of the multiple gun threads that don't get insta-locked. Then you will see war.
Humanity is the creation of Logic and Emotion, Calculation and Imagination, Cold Analysis and Blind Faith. This is why I believe it is a strange Human that would prize one while shunning the other. For a calculator can do math just as well as you, but a calculator can not use math to make the world a better place.
Describe what the first 5 steps would be in a version of Minecraft, where design is irrelevant and realism is the only (and i mean ONLY) focus. Oh, and you start with no items.
This actually sounds fun. What would I do if i were dropped into a completely empty planet earth?
1) find a stick
2) sharpen said stick
3) Attempt to hunt food with a terribly ineffective device
4) eat various plants in hopes to survive
5) die from eating some poisonous plant (most likely)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
A wise person once said: "Offense is never given, only taken."
But for some odd reason... You complain about how the game isn't realistic, then you start wars on the community forums, tell us all that its doomed and laugh you butt off by reading the comments! How is that entertaining? Your beaten 1000000 to 1 (or more depending on who agrees with you). Why you think it's called a game? For you to play and in joy, not complain and rant about.
And thanks for the compliment, it's very appeciated!
But for some odd reason... You complain about how the game isn't realistic, then you start wars on the community forums, tell us all that its doomed and laugh you butt off by reading the comments! How is that entertaining? Your beaten 1000000 to 1 (or more depending on who agrees with you). Why you think it's called a game? For you to play and in joy, not complain and rant about.
And thanks for the compliment, it's very appeciated!
Well maybe he is outnumbered in this demographic yes, but sadly, I know many people who wont even try Minecraft because they don't want to play a game thats pixle-y, which is sad.
Also, if complainers couldn't complain, they'd complain about not being able to complain. They will always be there.
So, the only way to make the game partially decent is to remove half the freaking game and completely break the other half.
What you'd end up with is a laggy piece of crap, where you run around in a world until you starve to death or fall off a cliff. There would be literally nothing to achieve.
You know, this reminds me of one game. Dunno what it was called, but it was some movie game on the Atari which almost single-handedly destroyed gaming. I also recall every copy the developer still had was crushed, covered in cement, and buried in a landfill.
i couldn't care less how popular it is. as far as i'm concerned, COD and Skyrim suck and are overrated. minecraft has always had a certain appeal to making the game whatever you want it to be, realism gets in the way that vision.
That's cuz they did it wrong.
I have full faith in the Minecraft dev team that they can make a much more realistic game, and make it kick booty.
That would be E.T. the videogame, circa 1982
I've got a challenge for you.
Describe what the first 5 steps would be in a version of Minecraft, where design is irrelevant and realism is the only (and i mean ONLY) focus. Oh, and you start with no items.
Nope. It's BF3
Isn't a copy of that worth a small fortune nowadays? Do to the fact that only a handful of them escaped the genocide the devs committed on their own product.
On a side note: Why couldn't Duke Nukem Forever suffer the same fate as the E.T. game?
You've been trying to get my throat all day long.
Also, I like your pic
Because Duke Nukem actually bears a vague resemblance to a proper game.
But we aren't discussing ET or Duke Nukem here.
BF3 was the game that got buried. Case closed. 'nuff said
These threads aren't even skirmishes. You wan't to see a war? Go look at the terrain threads that crop up. Or one of the multiple gun threads that don't get insta-locked. Then you will see war.
Please stop talking. Some of us are actually trying to discuss an actual event. Not your obvious personal preference of COD over BF3.
This actually sounds fun. What would I do if i were dropped into a completely empty planet earth?
1) find a stick
2) sharpen said stick
3) Attempt to hunt food with a terribly ineffective device
4) eat various plants in hopes to survive
5) die from eating some poisonous plant (most likely)
And thanks for the compliment, it's very appeciated!
If its completely empty, you wouldn't be able to do 1, and everything following 1.
Well maybe he is outnumbered in this demographic yes, but sadly, I know many people who wont even try Minecraft because they don't want to play a game thats pixle-y, which is sad.
Also, if complainers couldn't complain, they'd complain about not being able to complain. They will always be there.
I didn't mean literally a ball of dirt empty. I meant devoid of any human habitation. Perhaps I should have been more clear.