Every day I see suggestions like this, and they all add up to: "Make Minecraft more like Dwarf Fortress."
If you want a super-realistic mining/crafting RPG, go play DF. It's free and in many ways it's much better than Minecraft. I play both of them, and they're amazing games in their own ways. It's a deep hardcore survival game, with seasons, realistic water, sickness, moods, (including different kinds of insanity) animal breeding, even your citizens having kids .Slaughtering an animal and being able to use every part of it, crafting its bones into arrows, tanning the skin and using it for armor, rendering the fat, feasting on the meat.
If any of this sounds good to you, go download Dwarf Fortress.
Minecraft isn't really meant to be realistic. It might be kind of cool if it was, but that would take away from its simplistic charm. If you're looking for a realistic and complex game, MCXBLA isn't it.
Every day I see suggestions like this, and they all add up to: "Make Minecraft more like Dwarf Fortress."
If you want a super-realistic mining/crafting RPG, go play DF. It's free and in many ways it's much better than Minecraft. I play both of them, and they're amazing games in their own ways. It's a deep hardcore survival game, with seasons, realistic water, sickness, moods, (including different kinds of insanity) animal breeding, even your citizens having kids .Slaughtering an animal and being able to use every part of it, crafting its bones into arrows, tanning the skin and using it for armor, rendering the fat, feasting on the meat.
If any of this sounds good to you, go download Dwarf Fortress.
Minecraft isn't really meant to be realistic. It might be kind of cool if it was, but that would take away from its simplistic charm. If you're looking for a realistic and complex game, MCXBLA isn't it.
I dont want to play that ...I like minecraft and want to make minecraft a better EXP for all
No. Fall would be the worst idea ever. very very few people probably want to see forest biomes turn into "1x1 towers of wood everywhere" biomes because the leaves fell off of them.
You also have an extremely irrational hatred of winter biomes. if you don't like them, don't go to them, if you absolutely cannot stand their existence, make new worlds until one spawns without without them.
No. Fall would be the worst idea ever. very very few people probably want to see forest biomes turn into "1x1 towers of wood everywhere" biomes because the leaves fell off of them.
You also have an extremely irrational hatred of winter biomes. if you don't like them, don't go to them, if you absolutely cannot stand their existence, make new worlds until one spawns without without them.
I like winter, I just think makeing it a assive season would be better than have a winter biome in the middle of a forest biome
I dont want to play that ...I like minecraft and want to make minecraft a better EXP for all
.......
Yes, but this isn't a big deal for most folks. Generally they have some sort of theme for a world. If they want snow, they find a nice Taiga biome, they don't want their world to only makes sense 25% of the time. If the purpose is realism, again, this is the wrong game for you. If the dev was concerned with making a realistic game, we wouldn't be able to throw sand in a furnace and watch perfect crystal clear glass appear magically. We wouldn't be able to build floating islands or castles made of diamonds. And a sneaky green kamikaze alien creature certainly wouldn't exist.
I like winter, I just think makeing it a assive season would be better than have a winter biome in the middle of a forest biome
if you dont like how your map is you shouldn't have ever started building on it. i also think it would be better to not have to rebuild a massive ice castle every 40 minecraft days.
if you dont like how your map is you shouldn't have ever started building on it. i also think it would be better to not have to rebuild a massive ice castle every 40 minecraft days.
I dont think ice melts unless you have a light source next to it
Yes, but this isn't a big deal for most folks. Generally they have some sort of theme for a world. If they want snow, they find a nice Taiga biome, they don't want their world to only makes sense 25% of the time. If the purpose is realism, again, this is the wrong game for you. If the dev was concerned with making a realistic game, we wouldn't be able to throw sand in a furnace and watch perfect crystal clear glass appear magically. We wouldn't be able to build floating islands or castles made of diamonds. And a sneaky green kamikaze alien creature certainly wouldn't exist.
I see your point but I still think it would be nice to have the option of seasonal play
Every day I see suggestions like this, and they all add up to: "Make Minecraft more like Dwarf Fortress."
If you want a super-realistic mining/crafting RPG, go play DF. It's free and in many ways it's much better than Minecraft. I play both of them, and they're amazing games in their own ways. It's a deep hardcore survival game, with seasons, realistic water, sickness, moods, (including different kinds of insanity) animal breeding, even your citizens having kids .Slaughtering an animal and being able to use every part of it, crafting its bones into arrows, tanning the skin and using it for armor, rendering the fat, feasting on the meat.
If any of this sounds good to you, go download Dwarf Fortress.
Minecraft isn't really meant to be realistic. It might be kind of cool if it was, but that would take away from its simplistic charm. If you're looking for a realistic and complex game, MCXBLA isn't it.
Is it on xbox or pc?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
What do you say to the god of thunder? **** you thunder *** *** **** ** ****- Ted Go see it
sun never melted ice before why change it...its all idea man
I see your point but I still think it would be nice to have the option of seasonal play
I like having the permanent biomes the way they are. My winter builds then make sense where they sit all the time and so do my summer themes. When I want to change seasons, I can just walk over from one biome into the other. I also agree with TN55, I wouldn't want to have to rebuild an ice structure every 40 Minecraft days; and I'm sure treehouse builders wouldn't be happy if their leaf walls fell off every 40 days as well. If you left ice non-melting, then you don't have a seasonal temperature change like you originally proposed. You have exactly what we have now - a biome that is cold year-round. FYI, snow in real life doesn't melt everytime the sun shines. Arctic barometric highs in winter produce clear skies, so some of the coldest days of the year "up north" are often also among the sunniest.
They should add the option to turn on seasons to adventure map, but the actual minecraft wouldn't feel the same without snow biomes.
Snow biomes shoudn't be deleted on minecraft!
I think haveing an option would be great this is what should happen, there are people like you guys who want to have a set biome world
and people like me who wants seasons
I think it would be fun and add to the survival aspect
sun never melted ice before why change it...its all idea man
Okay, you want seasons for realism, yet ice wouldn't melt..... This means all water would freeze over the winter, stuck as ice forever. You should have thought this out a bit more.
PC, a game like DF would be impossible to play on a console. It doesn't require an awesome PC though. Mine is terrible and runs DF easily, through Wine no less. It's available for other distros, I just emulate the Windows version, since that's the only OS people make mods for.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
How about we have a season system, 20 minecraft days and nights of Summer
10 days of Fall
20 days of winter
10 days of spring
I think that would make winter alot better what do you think?
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired StaffIf you want a super-realistic mining/crafting RPG, go play DF. It's free and in many ways it's much better than Minecraft. I play both of them, and they're amazing games in their own ways. It's a deep hardcore survival game, with seasons, realistic water, sickness, moods, (including different kinds of insanity) animal breeding, even your citizens having kids .Slaughtering an animal and being able to use every part of it, crafting its bones into arrows, tanning the skin and using it for armor, rendering the fat, feasting on the meat.
If any of this sounds good to you, go download Dwarf Fortress.
Minecraft isn't really meant to be realistic. It might be kind of cool if it was, but that would take away from its simplistic charm. If you're looking for a realistic and complex game, MCXBLA isn't it.
You also have an extremely irrational hatred of winter biomes. if you don't like them, don't go to them, if you absolutely cannot stand their existence, make new worlds until one spawns without without them.
having a desert covered in snow because it's winter would make just about as much sense
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired Staff.......
Yes, but this isn't a big deal for most folks. Generally they have some sort of theme for a world. If they want snow, they find a nice Taiga biome, they don't want their world to only makes sense 25% of the time. If the purpose is realism, again, this is the wrong game for you. If the dev was concerned with making a realistic game, we wouldn't be able to throw sand in a furnace and watch perfect crystal clear glass appear magically. We wouldn't be able to build floating islands or castles made of diamonds. And a sneaky green kamikaze alien creature certainly wouldn't exist.
if you dont like how your map is you shouldn't have ever started building on it. i also think it would be better to not have to rebuild a massive ice castle every 40 minecraft days.
right but your idea requires changing the game's mechanics and ice will not remain ice on a summer day.
I love my winter biome. Cowboy, youv'e seen bits of it, it's a very nice place, at least IMO.
If you don't like snowy biomes, then ffs follow the advice that says find a map that doesn't have them, or better yet, just dont build there!
I like having the permanent biomes the way they are. My winter builds then make sense where they sit all the time and so do my summer themes. When I want to change seasons, I can just walk over from one biome into the other. I also agree with TN55, I wouldn't want to have to rebuild an ice structure every 40 Minecraft days; and I'm sure treehouse builders wouldn't be happy if their leaf walls fell off every 40 days as well. If you left ice non-melting, then you don't have a seasonal temperature change like you originally proposed. You have exactly what we have now - a biome that is cold year-round. FYI, snow in real life doesn't melt everytime the sun shines. Arctic barometric highs in winter produce clear skies, so some of the coldest days of the year "up north" are often also among the sunniest.
PC
and people like me who wants seasons
I think it would be fun and add to the survival aspect
FYI - You do know it can snow in deserts right? So having a desert next to a snow biome in Minecraft really isn't that strange.
I think seasons is an even worse idea than snow.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired StaffOkay, you want seasons for realism, yet ice wouldn't melt..... This means all water would freeze over the winter, stuck as ice forever. You should have thought this out a bit more.
PC, a game like DF would be impossible to play on a console. It doesn't require an awesome PC though. Mine is terrible and runs DF easily, through Wine no less. It's available for other distros, I just emulate the Windows version, since that's the only OS people make mods for.