People say just because we payed for Skins doesn't mean we have to pay for Texture Packs.
I would love to see that. Sadly dlc cost money, 1st is development cost, they need people to make the packs. 2nd is publishing costs, microsoft requires money to publish the packs. Good thing about skins is that they can be used for advertising and can be paid for by advertising such as the free limited soa skins. Otherwise every dlc is runs the risk of not making its money back. There are games out with free dlc but I believe that's a way to keep customers. At least that's how I see it.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"If it already has been done then it can be done again" or
"If its a mod its possible to be a feature"
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I would love to see that. Sadly dlc cost money, 1st is development cost, they need people to make the packs. 2nd is publishing costs, microsoft requires money to publish the packs. Good thing about skins is that they can be used for advertising and can be paid for by advertising such as the free limited soa skins. Otherwise every dlc is runs the risk of not making its money back. There are games out with free dlc but I believe that's a way to keep customers. At least that's how I see it.
"If its a mod its possible to be a feature"