This thread strangely reminds me of the thread where the "dad" was upset with the word "Sexy" flashing on the title screen as the yellow text...
The rating suits the game fine. There is no blood in the game, and the dlc is not rated. The nurse isn't really at all anything "sexual" is the stereotypical Nurse, and about the name "Officer ****". What's wrong with that? **** is short for Richard. If you can't handled the a skin named "Officer ****" and find that adult...maybe it's yourself that has there mind in the gutter...as there is nothing wrong with it.
Seriously, why is it rated E? You can KILL monsters and other players with swords, bows and arrows, and explosions; there are ZOMBIES, skeletons, and giant spiders; and you can play as a bloody zombie, a guy named "Officer ****", and the sexually stereotyped nurse and swimmer.
Seems like the rating should read:
T for Teen:
Fantasy Violence
Blood
Mild Sexual Content
I'm sorry but this is really silly...
having non explicit violence in a game isn't going to get a game a T rating, thats like saying Mario deserves a T rating because he jumps on goombas. You mention blood.... what blood?
as for the sexual content.... firstly **** is another word for detective. Secondly, I don't see how you can call the nurse or swimmer sexually stereotyped. obviously they are stereotyped to look like what we see nurses and swimmers to look like but considering they don't even have protruding breasts or anything like that its hardly sexual.
Also... these skins coming in a DLC which means they are not included with the original game so they have no effect on the games rating.
EDIT: now that I read the first post again this must be a troll no one could really think this.
having non explicit violence in a game isn't going to get a game a T rating, thats like saying Mario deserves a T rating because he jumps on goombas. You mention blood.... what blood?
as for the sexual content.... firstly **** is another word for detective. Secondly, I don't see how you can call the nurse or swimmer sexually stereotyped. obviously they are stereotyped to look like what we see nurses and swimmers to look like but considering they don't even have protruding breasts or anything like that its hardly sexual.
Also... these skins coming in a DLC which means they are not included with the original game so they have no effect on the games rating.
EDIT: now that I read the first post again this must be a troll no one could really think this.
You'd be surprised... but you're probably right. A more serious claim would be rating of M because of the non existed sexual content.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"If it already has been done then it can be done again" or
"If its a mod its possible to be a feature"
The last thing I think of for Minecraft is scary. The game is finely rated the way it is. Until there is actual blood and screams or something I think it is fine at E10+
I have a question. Since women apparently have the right to play the sexually stereotyped card, if they add a skin of a male construction worker, can I say that is sexually stereotyped?
There is ZERO blood in the game. There is also ZERO sexual content. You are just making it sexual. Nobody I know has looked at the skins that are female and though they looked in any way, shape, or form sexual.
Also, it's rated E10+, not E. This game is perfectly suited for the rating of E10+.
It is rated E10+ for Fantasy Violence. It also adds this... Includes online features that may expose players to unrated user-generated content (Xbox 360)
i actually agree with this guy, for once.
i think we all realize charity is a perv thinking that the nurse and victorian swimmer are sexual. i mean really? LOL.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Forum AdminThe rating suits the game fine. There is no blood in the game, and the dlc is not rated. The nurse isn't really at all anything "sexual" is the stereotypical Nurse, and about the name "Officer ****". What's wrong with that? **** is short for Richard. If you can't handled the a skin named "Officer ****" and find that adult...maybe it's yourself that has there mind in the gutter...as there is nothing wrong with it.
I'm sorry but this is really silly...
having non explicit violence in a game isn't going to get a game a T rating, thats like saying Mario deserves a T rating because he jumps on goombas. You mention blood.... what blood?
as for the sexual content.... firstly **** is another word for detective. Secondly, I don't see how you can call the nurse or swimmer sexually stereotyped. obviously they are stereotyped to look like what we see nurses and swimmers to look like but considering they don't even have protruding breasts or anything like that its hardly sexual.
Also... these skins coming in a DLC which means they are not included with the original game so they have no effect on the games rating.
EDIT: now that I read the first post again this must be a troll no one could really think this.
You'd be surprised... but you're probably right. A more serious claim would be rating of M because of the non existed sexual content.
"If its a mod its possible to be a feature"
Mw3 was not scary at all... Dora is scarier then MW3
i actually agree with this guy, for once.
i think we all realize charity is a perv thinking that the nurse and victorian swimmer are sexual. i mean really? LOL.
When it had another sequel for Wii, it was rated E.
ESRB IS GETTING MOAR STRICT!