Aww, Peyton beat me to posting the first texture.
Wool, grass, dirt, hardened dirt, gravel, snow. This palette is very contrasty. Are we allowed to change palettes?
Aww, Peyton beat me to posting the first texture.
Wool, grass, dirt, hardened dirt, gravel, snow. This palette is very contrasty. Are we allowed to change palettes?
Aww, Peyton beat me to posting the first texture.
Wool, grass, dirt, hardened dirt, gravel, snow. This palette is very contrasty. Are we allowed to change palettes?
That wool totally isn't rotated grass.
It certainly is very contrasty. In hindsight, it probably wasn't that good for making textures for a 3D game.
Are the bricks/cobble at least passable as simple? Maybe if I make some adjustments..
Not really.
It's hard to put a definition on "simple" since that's kind of subjective. In my mind, "simple" in this context requires large color fields and no details that are only a single pixel except perhaps for lines. That's what I think, but it's really up to the contest organizer whether or not it counts.
Darn! This challenge is difficult! It's hard to make something that looks good without adding any details. I'm about half way done with the stone and ores my my attempt. I'll have something to post in a few hours... I hope.
Here's to another, and hopefully successful, attempt at this challenge! Good luck to everyone and anyone!
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired StaffChop chop, make with the texture.
Here is a grass side that I made with Deonyi's palette. I don't know if I will keep it.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse PremiumWool, grass, dirt, hardened dirt, gravel, snow. This palette is very contrasty. Are we allowed to change palettes?
That wool totally isn't rotated grass.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired StaffYes, but you will have to start over.
It certainly is very contrasty. In hindsight, it probably wasn't that good for making textures for a 3D game.
I don't know if I've ever seen a grass side style like that in 16x. Looks really good!
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse Premium-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse PremiumRe-did everything with Deonyi's palette. Used the exact same style, though, so stuff looks similar.
Pixel art is not a style and it's not my own palette. But I agree that it's not simple enough.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired Staff-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired StaffI'm right there with you. I'm trying to make stone and my brain is like "NOOOOO! Look at all the empty space to add details! You're wasting it!"
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired StaffThese are amazing, but definitely DEFINITELY not simple textures.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired StaffFail dirt... unsure if grass is 'simple' enough.
Are the bricks/cobble at least passable as simple? Maybe if I make some adjustments..
I may participate, if I can actually make a palette that isn't eye-burning
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired StaffNot really.
It's hard to put a definition on "simple" since that's kind of subjective. In my mind, "simple" in this context requires large color fields and no details that are only a single pixel except perhaps for lines. That's what I think, but it's really up to the contest organizer whether or not it counts.
I'm not too worried about that. What's the point of having cliches if you don't occasionally play with them.
Then again, my first attempt at this looked like it was strait out of Bluebird so I guess one does need to be a little bit careful.
Yea, I think it's a little too detailed.
Darn! This challenge is difficult! It's hard to make something that looks good without adding any details.