I don't think buying the Full version is worth it, basically you earn alot on the Lite Version compare to the Full Version. You know some of us can't buy your work because some of us poor, can't afford it because parents won't waste money on things that are not important, or we can't buy it because maybe we might get hacked. So i won't be using this anytime soon at all then since i can't buy it and my parents won't allow me to borrow their cradit card for this
I don't think buying the Full version is worth it, basically you earn alot on the Lite Version compare to the Full Version. You know some of us can't buy your work because some of us poor, can't afford it because parents won't waste money on things that are not important, or we can't buy it because maybe we might get hacked. So i won't be using this anytime soon at all then since i can't buy it and my parents won't allow me to borrow their cradit card for this
Basically, if you can't afford the pack, you can't afford a computer to run it at all.
Plus, if you really think something is not worth it, why are you even complaining? : )
You can always just stick to the Lite version: it's here for a reason.
That's why the internet is so cool: you have choice. If you don't want to get it, don't get it, it's that easy. Your choice : )
Basically, if you can't afford the pack, you can't afford a computer to run it at all.
Plus, if you really think something is not worth it, why are you even complaining? : )
You can always just stick to the Lite version: it's here for a reason.
That's why the internet is so cool: you have choice. If you don't want to get it, don't get it, it's that easy. Your choice : )
Speaking of being able to have a computer that can run it: What is your computer setup Matt? I got a Gtx 970 and a i7 3.5ghz combo and I get powerpoint-esque frame rates (8-12fps) when I run the pack.
Speaking of being able to have a computer that can run it: What is your computer setup Matt? I got a Gtx 970 and a i7 3.5ghz combo and I get powerpoint-esque frame rates (8-12fps) when I run the pack.
Is this with a shaderpack/Optifine or with other mods ? Because this is not normal with a GTX 970 even with a big shaderpack like SEUS and 512x resource pack like Realistico you should get a framerate better than 30 FPS. Something is wrong from your side.
Hello guys, I have recently buy the Realistico and I am in difficult to make it work right. Every blocks looks pixelated which is really ugly ...
I got some screens to show you and hope you'll find a solution to help me
I can't find a solution with my research
I use : - SEUS v11
- Realistico-19-07-full
Try turning Mipmap levels up to 4 and, if you have optifine, antialiasing to off if it isn't already. This may cause Minecraft to freeze up, so do it in the main menu or, better yet, in the configs if you know how.
Speaking of being able to have a computer that can run it: What is your computer setup Matt? I got a Gtx 970 and a i7 3.5ghz combo and I get powerpoint-esque frame rates (8-12fps) when I run the pack.
For now I have an i7 6700K clocked at 4.4, 32GB DDR4 2400, and a 1080. Water cooled. I'll soon switch to a different setup though.
Anyway, a 970 is no joke for now, you should get great performances! What's your display resolution? Also check your settings.
I'm trying to fix the Help section with some tips for performance optimization, btw.
Is this with a shaderpack/Optifine or with other mods ? Because this is not normal with a GTX 970 even with a big shaderpack like SEUS and 512x resource pack like Realistico you should get a framerate better than 30 FPS. Something is wrong from your side.
This is with just Optifine (along with shaders) + client side map mod. I get high fps when I do not have shaders, but the moment I put on a shader pack my fps crashes like a 1930s Wall Street.
This is with just Optifine (along with shaders) + client side map mod. I get high fps when I do not have shaders, but the moment I put on a shader pack my fps crashes like a 1930s Wall Street.
Try to allocate more RAM to Minecraft but this is still weird (try to check also without the map mod, sometimes only one small mod can mess with everything). I suppose that you play with the render distance on Normal and with other settings to default both in Minecraft and in Optifine's shaders settings, if it is not the case (for example if you play in Far or with the render resolution in 2x) your FPS can be low with a 970.
This is with just Optifine (along with shaders) + client side map mod. I get high fps when I do not have shaders, but the moment I put on a shader pack my fps crashes like a 1930s Wall Street.
Post all Optifine and Nvidia settings which are not set on default values. Also, which shaderpack and which version?
So to all the people having "this file is a virus issues" the free version download page has multiple false download links. They have you download an iso file named Realistico.zip.iso or something like that which is most definitely a trojan. Matteo, you should really switch to another host website since most people will blame you for giving them a trojan which could result in a bad reputation for your pack. Which would be a shame since this pack has the best textures I have ever seen. I bought the full version a while back but ended up using the lite version instead for performance reasons which is how I ran into the false links.
Ciao matteo,
sadly my computer screen broke and I have not got it replaced. Expect it soon, as im getting a new screen soon.
Thanks
clockpie
Here be thy video!
I don't think buying the Full version is worth it, basically you earn alot on the Lite Version compare to the Full Version. You know some of us can't buy your work because some of us poor, can't afford it because parents won't waste money on things that are not important, or we can't buy it because maybe we might get hacked. So i won't be using this anytime soon at all then since i can't buy it and my parents won't allow me to borrow their cradit card for this
I'm TheCoolSteveMan, you can call me CSM for short!
Basically, if you can't afford the pack, you can't afford a computer to run it at all.
Plus, if you really think something is not worth it, why are you even complaining? : )
You can always just stick to the Lite version: it's here for a reason.
That's why the internet is so cool: you have choice. If you don't want to get it, don't get it, it's that easy. Your choice : )
Speaking of being able to have a computer that can run it: What is your computer setup Matt? I got a Gtx 970 and a i7 3.5ghz combo and I get powerpoint-esque frame rates (8-12fps) when I run the pack.
Is this with a shaderpack/Optifine or with other mods ? Because this is not normal with a GTX 970 even with a big shaderpack like SEUS and 512x resource pack like Realistico you should get a framerate better than 30 FPS. Something is wrong from your side.
Try turning Mipmap levels up to 4 and, if you have optifine, antialiasing to off if it isn't already. This may cause Minecraft to freeze up, so do it in the main menu or, better yet, in the configs if you know how.
For now I have an i7 6700K clocked at 4.4, 32GB DDR4 2400, and a 1080. Water cooled. I'll soon switch to a different setup though.
Anyway, a 970 is no joke for now, you should get great performances! What's your display resolution? Also check your settings.
I'm trying to fix the Help section with some tips for performance optimization, btw.
This is with just Optifine (along with shaders) + client side map mod. I get high fps when I do not have shaders, but the moment I put on a shader pack my fps crashes like a 1930s Wall Street.
Try to allocate more RAM to Minecraft but this is still weird (try to check also without the map mod, sometimes only one small mod can mess with everything). I suppose that you play with the render distance on Normal and with other settings to default both in Minecraft and in Optifine's shaders settings, if it is not the case (for example if you play in Far or with the render resolution in 2x) your FPS can be low with a 970.
Post all Optifine and Nvidia settings which are not set on default values. Also, which shaderpack and which version?
I have the same exact rig except my ram is 16gb and 3200mb. What type of radiator do you have?
Every time I try to download it my computer says it's a trojan.
Also, when I let it download (by forcefully making Windows Defender shut the hell up) it downloads an EXE program.
WARNING DON'T DOWNLOAD OR BUY. HAS THIS HAS BEEN DECTED HAS A VIRUIS BY VIRUS CHECK.COM ALSO by my 3 Virus Softwear.
Bought it, been using it fine on my computer. Scanned the pack with Malwarebytes, nada.
FALSE ALARM!
Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
www.malwarebytes.org Scan Date: 17/01/2017
Scan Time: 18:16
Logfile: Realistico.txt
Administrator: Yes Version: 2.2.1.1043
Malware Database: v2017.01.17.09
Rootkit Database: v2016.11.20.01
License: Premium
Malware Protection: Enabled
Malicious Website Protection: Enabled
Self-protection: Enabled OS: Windows 7 Service Pack 1
CPU: x64
File System: NTFS
User: Freedomna Scan Type: Threat Scan
Result: Completed
Objects Scanned: 1
Time Elapsed: 0 min, 14 sec Memory: Disabled
Startup: Disabled
Filesystem: Enabled
Archives: Enabled
Rootkits: Disabled
Heuristics: Enabled
PUP: Enabled
PUM: Enabled Processes: 0
(No malicious items detected) Modules: 0
(No malicious items detected) Registry Keys: 0
(No malicious items detected) Registry Values: 0
(No malicious items detected) Registry Data: 0
(No malicious items detected) Folders: 0
(No malicious items detected) Files: 0
(No malicious items detected) Physical Sectors: 0
(No malicious items detected) (end)
So to all the people having "this file is a virus issues" the free version download page has multiple false download links. They have you download an iso file named Realistico.zip.iso or something like that which is most definitely a trojan. Matteo, you should really switch to another host website since most people will blame you for giving them a trojan which could result in a bad reputation for your pack. Which would be a shame since this pack has the best textures I have ever seen. I bought the full version a while back but ended up using the lite version instead for performance reasons which is how I ran into the false links.
bump
Yeah,
Gonna buy the full version soon since this is the only Default Realism Texture Pack that I considered THE BEST!
I'm TheCoolSteveMan, you can call me CSM for short!
Hey Bro, how could you do that?? Can you give an Setting on Shaders? it seems mine is not looks so very well :c
There is a tutorial on his website