Minecraft Forums

It's not bad from what I can see. It looks like your ores need imbedding though. (right now they look flat on the stone)

Judging from half of those textures, the other half aren't made by you. For instance, the planks and cobblestone could not possibly be made by the same guy that put that face on a pumpkin.
-After downloading, to try and further my point-
Yep. I was so right.

Quote from Seradicus

Judging from half of those textures, the other half aren't made by you. For instance, the planks and cobblestone could not possibly be made by the same guy that put that face on a pumpkin.
-After downloading, to try and further my point-
Yep. I was so right.

The Pumpkin is make to look purposely Derpy, just as a joke of sorts.

I suggest making the ores different from one another. Take a look at the Johnsmith texture pack...the ores are unique from others. I love to see that kind of thing in texture packs.

Quote from Cocacolaman7690

The Pumpkin is make to look purposely Derpy, just as a joke of sorts.

That's bull. Let me list many terrible textures.*
There's more, but I got bored.

Also, many of the textures are clearly resized, as well as not tessellating** properly.

tl;dr-- What you did was to put single color lines over, presumably, resized Google Images. This is not texturing, nor is it any other form of art, regardless of style and quality. This is further proven by the lack of proper tessellation** within the textures of higher quality.

*This is not limited to stating blocks, rather, it is listing most textures as they are, be it side, top, bottom, or other sided textures.
**Everything should flow from one block to another, rather than having visible cut-offs on details.

Quote from Seradicus

That's bull. Let me list many terrible textures.*

• Pumpkin
• Jack-o-lantern
• Stone Bricks
• Mossy Stone Bricks
• Cracked Stone Bricks
• Torch
• Redstone Torch
• Wooden Door
• Iron Door
• Jukebox
• NoteBlock(Top of)
• Iron Block
• Gold Block
• Diamond Block
• Emerald Block
• Oak Logs
• Spruce Logs
• Birch Logs
• Jungle Logs
• Trapdoor
• Piston Head
• Piston Head (Sticky)
• Piston Under-side
• Piston Side
• Piston Back
• Furnace
• Furnace(Lit)
• Dispenser
• Furnace/Dispenser Side
• Furnace/Dispenser Top
• Wool(All)
• Redstone Lamp(On)
• Redstone Lamp(Off)
• Mossy Cobblestone
• TNT Side
• TNT Top
• TNT Bottom

There's more, but I got bored.

Also, many of the textures are clearly resized, as well as not tessellating** properly.

tl;dr-- What you did was to put single color lines over, presumably, resized Google Images. This is not texturing, nor is it any other form of art, regardless of style and quality. This is further proven by the lack of proper tessellation** within the textures of higher quality.

*This is not limited to stating blocks, rather, it is listing most textures as they are, be it side, top, bottom, or other sided textures.
**Everything should flow from one block to another, rather than having visible cut-offs on details.

Hey, if you don't like the texture pack there's this simple thing you can do. Not use it. This is my first texture pack, There's going to be some bad textures. Get over it.

Quote from Cocacolaman7690

Hey, if you don't like the texture pack there's this simple thing you can do. Not use it. This is my first texture pack, There's going to be some bad textures. Get over it.

My question is, why do people insist on posting their first pack? Why not practice more until you've actually got something to show?

Quote from Cocacolaman7690

Hey, if you don't like the texture pack there's this simple thing you can do. Not use it. This is my first texture pack, There's going to be some bad textures. Get over it.

Hey, if you don't like the fact that I don't approve of your resized Google Images,* don't post it. Don't even make it. And you know what? There's this old topic here, which basically says your excuse is bad, and you should feel bad. I went through the trouble of listing all the derptastically bad textures, and you simply ignored it.

tl;dr-- Criticism is a thing. People say negative things in it, to help the creator of a work improve. Sadly, you have ignored the previous criticisms and statements. Google Images is not a legitimate way to make a pack. People with 1000+ posts in this section usually know what they're talking about.

*Which you have yet to refute, thus, I continue to assume is true.

Iron is far too orange, needs to be more tan.

Quote from Gestankfaust

Because feedback is what people need. That's really what texture discussion is best for, but here is ok. How about you give "feedback" and not waste everyone's time?

This, and how else will they improve? Blunt honesty is the only way.