Although I still prefer Vattic's 32x32 pack, this one is still fine. There are a few textures missing, one example being the rabbit's meat sprite, both cooked and raw.
Unlike most people here, I actually think this texture pack can be cool for adventure maps underground or something. My apologies if you find that degrading, but it's only my opinion.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"There are no words to describe the immersive, engaging experience video games can provide so quickly. This has developed communities, so why do so many people say they are harmful? 90% of those criticizers have never played or even tried a video game. Is it not said, 'Don't shoot it 'till you try it'?"
If he alive from army i will happy so mush!! I know you guys hate to wait and wait and WAIT HIM BACK! to Update his Texture Pack. But, I want to know did he alive or not?! Please come back sir... we need you! or someone make how to make Faithful x64 HiTeeN Edition
Your Faithful pack is by far my favourite Faithful-/Default-with-more-pixels/resolution-Pack in existence };]
I love to use it, although it's outdated.
You said that you'd come back by the end of summer 2015 - you didn't, so I hope everythings fine with you, I know real life can be quite demanding };]
If you don't come back by the end of year, I guess I'll try to create the rest of textures that are missing for myself, because, as I said, your Faithful pack is by far the most clearest and precise texturepack in the lower resolutions up to 64 pixels.
Aside from yours, I really do love many textures from R3dCraft, but those are highres (128-512 pixel I think).
- Anyway, as you can see, your texturepack got many fans, would be nice to hear from you, even if it'd be bad news, that you don't have any time anymore or so, but at the very least let us know what's up };]
R3dCraft goes from 32x32-512x512 last time I looked. I wouldn't recommend going below 64x64 on the R3dCraft textures though because they do get quite blurry beneath that. There are still some textures that are blurry on 64x64 (Glowstone for example).
In regards to this pack, I agree that it is really well done. I've been using this pack for quite some time now and I love it. I would love to hear a progress update as well. There are still quite a few blocks that are untextured.
You're a terrible person. You re-used his textures without permission! Please ask him first!
He didn't use vattic faithfull textures, he used default textures and made them 64x64,
but instead of using default as a base, he did use vattic's faithfull, and he made it 64x64 and not 32x32
Everyone is hating but this dude only wanted to make default look nicer.
I've just discovered this texture-pack yesterday and this texture-pack looks really nice but however, it is available for 1.7 and 1.6 I believe. If you would like to (if you have time) update this texture-pack to 1.8 and above. That'll be really awesome!