killerbee13 did you happen to finish the remastered lang file
Most of my changes actually came from it, so I considered it to be mostly suitable as-is. I can look again, though.
*looks*
It's about 50/50 between stuff needing correction and stuff that was altered in the remastered pack. I can write a patch tomorrow, but tonight I must go to bed.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
My personal motto: My only desire is that I leave so deep an impression on you as you have left on me.
It's about 50/50 between stuff needing correction and stuff that was altered in the remastered pack. I can write a patch tomorrow, but tonight I must go to bed.
The Meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything.
Join Date:
5/3/2011
Posts:
49
Minecraft:
killerbee13
Member Details
2 Git tutorials (and a CLI reference), 4 file copies, 6 entries of my account name&password, and 6 pull requests later, I have a local repository and I have fixed the 1.8-Remastered langfile as well as removed the spelling errors from the old ones.
Can I also just say that the HTMLs are abysmally written and that I would like to rewrite them in a way which should look the same but which doesn't have 5 redundant list tags on each line? Also, the complete reliance on <br>'s in a list and lack of indentation offends my sensibilities.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
My personal motto: My only desire is that I leave so deep an impression on you as you have left on me.
This is the page I started on, I didn't open a pull request yet because my changes slightly broke the other pages. It is slightly more compact but looks overall the same, and the HTML is much cleaner and does not contain significant errors (Can you believe that the original didn't even have a close on the head, body, or html tags?).
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
My personal motto: My only desire is that I leave so deep an impression on you as you have left on me.
The Meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything.
Join Date:
5/3/2011
Posts:
49
Minecraft:
killerbee13
Member Details
Should we add a GitHub zip link to the downloads page? GitHub allows you to download the entire repository as a .zip, which would give people access to the "nightly" version. Then again, the people who are likely to need that are probably more likely to be maintaining the repo themselves, and therefore would go to the page. If it's listed 3rd with a note, then people will probably only click it if it's what they want, right? Also, it's probably the only choice with the 1.9 pack and any other pack that's being actively developed.
(I wrote this entire comment and then got distracted and left it open for like 8 hours. Oops)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
My personal motto: My only desire is that I leave so deep an impression on you as you have left on me.
it takes me 4 hrs to upload all the packs to 2 sites then add the new links to the Github zero once had it setup in a different way where he didnt have to get on the git pages to update the links
Can someone fix a new lore banner? for the op. the old one said coming soon!
or a whole new set?
Finished the new op view it on the github.
http://i.imgur.com/ZYos1.png
Original link for the Coming Soon banner
My personal motto: My only desire is that I leave so deep an impression on you as you have left on me.
Not what I was asking but ok... I had that one... the lore is here tho
killerbee13 did you happen to finish the remastered lang file
Just finished The Digital Nightmare Fourm page... http://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/mapping-and-modding/resource-packs/2509940-the-digital-nightmare-music-pack-minecrafts-post
I was wondering, what should we do for the new "End City" blocks. The end right now is hectic as it is; how should we approach it?
i don't know but i will be working on a new lore page later this week if you want to help.
I am thinking the end will need a full face lift.
It appears that I misread your request.
Most of my changes actually came from it, so I considered it to be mostly suitable as-is. I can look again, though.
*looks*
It's about 50/50 between stuff needing correction and stuff that was altered in the remastered pack. I can write a patch tomorrow, but tonight I must go to bed.
My personal motto: My only desire is that I leave so deep an impression on you as you have left on me.
Thanks!
2 Git tutorials (and a CLI reference), 4 file copies, 6 entries of my account name&password, and 6 pull requests later, I have a local repository and I have fixed the 1.8-Remastered langfile as well as removed the spelling errors from the old ones.
Can I also just say that the HTMLs are abysmally written and that I would like to rewrite them in a way which should look the same but which doesn't have 5 redundant list tags on each line? Also, the complete reliance on <br>'s in a list and lack of indentation offends my sensibilities.
My personal motto: My only desire is that I leave so deep an impression on you as you have left on me.
Thank you!
I have little idea how to code html, I was just editing what was there in such a way it would have no bugs.
And today's edits were only to set up scaffolds for the new update, and to correct links.
i will be adding another page for MCPE
Cant wait for Derek to come back online to replace the op.
I told him to check back in a few days, he said ok... I finished it in 3 hrs. DX
https://killerbee13.github.io/LAST_DAYS/1.6/incomplete.html
This is the page I started on, I didn't open a pull request yet because my changes slightly broke the other pages. It is slightly more compact but looks overall the same, and the HTML is much cleaner and does not contain significant errors (Can you believe that the original didn't even have a close on the head, body, or html tags?).
My personal motto: My only desire is that I leave so deep an impression on you as you have left on me.
keep up the good work ill fix anything you break.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse Premium*A few days later*
Should we add a GitHub zip link to the downloads page? GitHub allows you to download the entire repository as a .zip, which would give people access to the "nightly" version. Then again, the people who are likely to need that are probably more likely to be maintaining the repo themselves, and therefore would go to the page. If it's listed 3rd with a note, then people will probably only click it if it's what they want, right? Also, it's probably the only choice with the 1.9 pack and any other pack that's being actively developed.
(I wrote this entire comment and then got distracted and left it open for like 8 hours. Oops)
My personal motto: My only desire is that I leave so deep an impression on you as you have left on me.
it takes me 4 hrs to upload all the packs to 2 sites then add the new links to the Github zero once had it setup in a different way where he didnt have to get on the git pages to update the links
is windows 10 version that same as PE? i guess ill add in the page for it later.
looks good thanks derek