Mod edit: Adf.ly links removed & topic locked until proof of permission is given.
Sparx's Texture Pack
Version 4.5
This is a texture pack I've been maintaining since Alpha 1.2.1. Most of the textures are from JohnSmith's pack, a few are from the GeruDoku pack and thread and theres some things by Glimmar. Some mobs and the moon are by Kas.
Although this is a mix pack, I've edited most of the textures in here by hand, pixel by pixel.
The pack is fully 32px, includes animated water and lava, and 32px items as well (which requires the HD texture fix).
(click for higher resolution)
Submit your screenshots! Press F1 to turn off HUD and press F2 to take a screenshot.
Download link: 4.5 (1.5_01):-modsnip of fake link (wasn't to a TP-download)-
changed to old sponge and spawner textures, re-releasing pack
v4.4c:
made new sponge and spawner textures
v4.4b:
forgot about new saplings, added them
v4.4a:
old block breaking animation due to request
v4.4:
new armor textures
new block breaking animation
snow, rain, particles added
all new GUI
some new art
new in-game arrows texture
new repeater, cookie and tool sprites
new ores, lightstone, redstone, half step, bedrock
booster rail and detector rail added
wolves
v4.3a:
old block breaking animation restored
v4.3:
new redstone repeater block
new block breaking animation
v4.2:
update to 1.3_01
new armor sprites
a few more things
v4.0:
released to public!
updated to 1.2_02
many new icons and some new textures
That looks like Glimmar's glowstone.
Please ask the artist's before posting.
And if you didn't ask and are not giving all credit... DO NOT PUT UP ADF.LY LINKS!
You may have changed things slightly, but I can still see all the artist's textures in this.
This guy's first thread was locked because it turned into a flamewar because of Glimmar's glowstone..
Sparx, please tell me you got permission this time..
That looks like Glimmar's glowstone.
Please ask the artist's before posting.
And if you didn't ask and are not giving all credit... DO NOT PUT UP ADF.LY LINKS!
You may have changed things slightly, but I can still see all the artist's textures in this.
Shut up please. Of course I asked permission before posting this. I've read the forum rules. As for adf.ly links, they don't harm anyone :tongue.gif:
I love how the first post on a mix pack is always "did you get permission for this"
And yea, I am giving credit. Just not now. I'm busy.
That looks like Glimmar's glowstone.
Please ask the artist's before posting.
And if you didn't ask and are not giving all credit... DO NOT PUT UP ADF.LY LINKS!
You may have changed things slightly, but I can still see all the artist's textures in this.
Shut up please. Of course I asked permission before posting this. I've read the forum rules. As for adf.ly links, they don't harm anyone :tongue.gif:
I love how the first post on a mix pack is always "did you get permission for this"
And yea, I am giving credit. Just not now. I'm busy.
Why didn't you wait until you weren't busy to post this so you could get proper credit.
Why do you care bud? I'm reposting this thread because I just re-launched my server again and put a link to this in the post. Mind your own business or get lost. The amount of stuff I have to do right now is incredible, and I doubt you could handle even a portion of it.
You're not allowed to redistribute other people's work without permission and proof of that permission (post a quote in the thread) as well as a note saying you didn't make the textures and credit due to those people who made them.
As for the adf.ly links, I've reported them to a mod as it's not your work and you're not allowed to capitalize off of other people's work without their permission. If they don't say you can make money from remixing their packs, then please don't attempt to do so.
You're saying you got permission from Doku, Johnsmith, Glimmar, Dusty, and whoever's other textures you've used? And they also allowed you to capitalize off of their work?
You're not allowed to redistribute other people's work without permission and proof of that permission (post a quote in the thread) as well as a note saying you didn't make the textures and credit due to those people who made them.
Since when is proof of permission required? It's not in the rules.
Quote from Lilyo »
As for the adf.ly links, I've reported them to a mod as it's not your work and you're not allowed to capitalize off of other people's work without their permission. If they don't say you can make money from remixing their packs, then please don't attempt to do so.
The concept behind adf.ly links is that drawing traffic to your links generates some money. It doesn't matter what's behind those links. How would it be any different if I were to trick everyone and link them to a picture of dirt. Am I profiting off that dirt? Not directly, no. And besides, the only condition that the authors said was that I not ask for donations for my pack.
Quote from Lilyo »
You're saying you got permission from Doku, Johnsmith, Glimmar, Dusty, and whoever's other textures you've used? And they also allowed you to capitalize off of their work?
I guess you can't read eh?
Quote from stumpkin »
Flamewar v2.0
FML
Quote from Amalah »
Why not just create a texture pack from scratch? It's very satisfying when you see the finished article.
I would if I could. But this suits my tastes perfectly, anything I could make wouldn't be nearly as good as this.
You're not allowed to redistribute other people's work without permission and proof of that permission (post a quote in the thread) as well as a note saying you didn't make the textures and credit due to those people who made them.
Since when is proof of permission required? It's not in the rules.
Quote from Lilyo »
As for the adf.ly links, I've reported them to a mod as it's not your work and you're not allowed to capitalize off of other people's work without their permission. If they don't say you can make money from remixing their packs, then please don't attempt to do so.
The concept behind adf.ly links is that drawing traffic to your links generates some money. It doesn't matter what's behind those links. How would it be any different if I were to trick everyone and link them to a picture of dirt. Am I profiting off that dirt? Not directly, no. And besides, the only condition that the authors said was that I not ask for donations for my pack.
Quote from Lilyo »
You're saying you got permission from Doku, Johnsmith, Glimmar, Dusty, and whoever's other textures you've used? And they also allowed you to capitalize off of their work?
I guess you can't read eh?
Quote from stumpkin »
Flamewar v2.0
FML
Quote from Amalah »
Why not just create a texture pack from scratch? It's very satisfying when you see the finished article.
I would if I could. But this suits my tastes perfectly, anything I could make wouldn't be nearly as good as this.
Copyrighting. /post
But seriously, I knew in preschool if I copied someone's work and wrote it a little differently, I wouldn't get a gold star or whatever, I would be sent to the corner. Replace that with money, and... I think you get my drift.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I develop games then lose the code and fail to release them.
You're not allowed to redistribute other people's work without permission and proof of that permission (post a quote in the thread) as well as a note saying you didn't make the textures and credit due to those people who made them.
As for the adf.ly links, I've reported them to a mod as it's not your work and you're not allowed to capitalize off of other people's work without their permission. If they don't say you can make money from remixing their packs, then please don't attempt to do so.
You're saying you got permission from Doku, Johnsmith, Glimmar, Dusty, and whoever's other textures you've used? And they also allowed you to capitalize off of their work?
Thank you Lilyo, for explaining this the best way possible. This was the reason that his first thread was lockified.
Quote from Sparx10 »
Since when is proof of permission required? It's not in the rules.
Oh, gee, isn't it just common courtesy? And also, I know it's somewhere. I will be back with my handy dandy rulebook. brb ballin
While adf.ly is fine for use by creators of content, it is not acceptable for people who create compilations of others work to do this unless you have the creators permission (and can provide proof of said permission).
You may only link to adf.ly if the content you're linking to is either you own, or you have permission. Any people not following this will have their topics removed.
While adf.ly is fine for use by creators of content, it is not acceptable for people who create compilations of others work to do this unless you have the creators permission (and can provide proof of said permission).
You may only link to adf.ly if the content you're linking to is either you own, or you have permission. Any people not following this will have their topics removed.
Never saw that. Link me the post/thread.
Quote from Goatouched »
If there's no proof of permission... I could just make a pack, consisting of 20 others, and say that I asked all of them and received permission.
And then the authors would come and anally rape you to hell, getting your thread locked.
You're not allowed to redistribute other people's work without permission and proof of that permission (post a quote in the thread) as well as a note saying you didn't make the textures and credit due to those people who made them.
Quote from Sparx10 »
Since when is proof of permission required? It's not in the rules.
NEVER:
Post Illegal Activity:
-Any material that is the work of another individual but is being represented as original. Permission must be obtained from the original creator, and due credit must be given, before including any element of that creator's work.
Quote from Lilyo »
As for the adf.ly links, I've reported them to a mod as it's not your work and you're not allowed to capitalize off of other people's work without their permission. If they don't say you can make money from remixing their packs, then please don't attempt to do so.
Quote from Sparx10 »
The concept behind adf.ly links is that drawing traffic to your links generates some money. It doesn't matter what's behind those links. How would it be any different if I were to trick everyone and link them to a picture of dirt. Am I profiting off that dirt? Not directly, no. And besides, the only condition that the authors said was that I not ask for donations for my pack.
Edit: Fine, I'll do something about the main download adf.ly link, one minute..
You're getting traffic due to material that is not your own. Mirroring it does not entitle you to make money off of it in any way...
Quote from Lilyo »
You're saying you got permission from Doku, Johnsmith, Glimmar, Dusty, and whoever's other textures you've used? And they also allowed you to capitalize off of their work?
Quote from Sparx10 »
I guess you can't read eh?
All I'm asking is for you to post a quote from each one down at the bottom of the post or something...
Getting permission doesn't equal just sending them a PM without them responding. JohnSmith, for example, hasn't been online for almost a week now...
Simply post what they said and it'll all be fine then :/
You're not allowed to redistribute other people's work without permission and proof of that permission (post a quote in the thread) as well as a note saying you didn't make the textures and credit due to those people who made them.
Quote from Sparx10 »
Since when is proof of permission required? It's not in the rules.
NEVER:
Post Illegal Activity:
-Any material that is the work of another individual but is being represented as original. Permission must be obtained from the original creator, and due credit must be given, before including any element of that creator's work.
Yes permission must be obtained. I have it. Go away.
Quote from Lilyo »
Quote from Lilyo »
You're saying you got permission from Doku, Johnsmith, Glimmar, Dusty, and whoever's other textures you've used? And they also allowed you to capitalize off of their work?
Quote from Sparx10 »
I guess you can't read eh?
All I'm asking is for you to post a quote from each one down at the bottom of the post or something...
Getting permission doesn't equal just sending them a PM without them responding. JohnSmith, for example, hasn't been online for almost a week now...
Simply post what they said and it'll all be fine then :/
Uh no, genius. I got responses well over a week ago. Can everyone just drop this now? If a moderator would like proof of permission, PM me. If anyone else wants proof, too bad. I don't feel like posting my PM's here.
adf.ly links were removed (removing the older versions atm)
Here's what you should do: Ask all the people you obtained credit from to post here, for us to know that you actually asked. Oherwise, I still believe you haven't got Glimmars, or anyone else's permission.
Here's what you should do: Ask all the people you obtained credit from to post here, for us to know that you actually asked. Oherwise, I still believe you haven't got Glimmars, or anyone else's permission.
As you may have read above, JohnSmith hasn't been online for a week. That's just a pain in everyone's ass to get them all to post here. None of you should be concerned with any permission unless you have works in this pack (which you do not).
Doku's a bit of a pompous ass imo.
Mod edit: Warn issued for flaming (in this case: calling a user "pompous ass").
Here's what you should do: Ask all the people you obtained credit from to post here, for us to know that you actually asked. Oherwise, I still believe you haven't got Glimmars, or anyone else's permission.
As you may have read above, JohnSmith hasn't been online for a week. That's just a pain in everyone's ass to get them all to post here. None of you should be concerned with any permission unless you have works in this pack (which you do not).
Doku's a bit of a pompous ass imo.
You shouldn't have posted this if you cannot give confirmation of permission and at least give all of the artists credit... it's the least you can do.
And calling Doku a pompous ass? Not a good idea.
I can give confirmation of permission. I'm just not giving it to you. Like I said, if a moderator wants to see it, he can PM me.
Version 4.5
This is a texture pack I've been maintaining since Alpha 1.2.1. Most of the textures are from JohnSmith's pack, a few are from the GeruDoku pack and thread and theres some things by Glimmar. Some mobs and the moon are by Kas.
Although this is a mix pack, I've edited most of the textures in here by hand, pixel by pixel.
The pack is fully 32px, includes animated water and lava, and 32px items as well (which requires the HD texture fix).
(click for higher resolution)
Submit your screenshots! Press F1 to turn off HUD and press F2 to take a screenshot.
Download link:
4.5 (1.5_01): -modsnip of fake link (wasn't to a TP-download)-
Join my server! :biggrin.gif:
Server Link: http://www.minecraftforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=1025&t=345107
Changelog:
v4.5:
changed to old sponge and spawner textures, re-releasing pack
v4.4c:made new sponge and spawner textures
v4.4b:forgot about new saplings, added them
v4.4a:old block breaking animation due to request
v4.4:new armor textures
v4.3a:new block breaking animation
snow, rain, particles added
all new GUI
some new art
new in-game arrows texture
new repeater, cookie and tool sprites
new ores, lightstone, redstone, half step, bedrock
booster rail and detector rail added
wolves
old block breaking animation restored
v4.3:new redstone repeater block
v4.2:new block breaking animation
update to 1.3_01
v4.0:new armor sprites
a few more things
released to public!
updated to 1.2_02
many new icons and some new textures
Credits:
Glimmar: glowstone, stained glass painting
Sumpumpolis: sponge and spawner, armor
Richasachboy: weapons, armor
Ioncat: pumpkin
No_Man: redstone
tombones: most of the items
JohnSmith: most of the terrain
kas: mobs, moon
Enjoy :biggrin.gif:
This guy's first thread was locked because it turned into a flamewar because of Glimmar's glowstone..
Sparx, please tell me you got permission this time..
Shut up please. Of course I asked permission before posting this. I've read the forum rules. As for adf.ly links, they don't harm anyone :tongue.gif:
I love how the first post on a mix pack is always "did you get permission for this"
And yea, I am giving credit. Just not now. I'm busy.
Why do you care bud? I'm reposting this thread because I just re-launched my server again and put a link to this in the post. Mind your own business or get lost. The amount of stuff I have to do right now is incredible, and I doubt you could handle even a portion of it.
As for the adf.ly links, I've reported them to a mod as it's not your work and you're not allowed to capitalize off of other people's work without their permission. If they don't say you can make money from remixing their packs, then please don't attempt to do so.
You're saying you got permission from Doku, Johnsmith, Glimmar, Dusty, and whoever's other textures you've used? And they also allowed you to capitalize off of their work?
Since when is proof of permission required? It's not in the rules.
The concept behind adf.ly links is that drawing traffic to your links generates some money. It doesn't matter what's behind those links. How would it be any different if I were to trick everyone and link them to a picture of dirt. Am I profiting off that dirt? Not directly, no. And besides, the only condition that the authors said was that I not ask for donations for my pack.
I guess you can't read eh?
FML
I would if I could. But this suits my tastes perfectly, anything I could make wouldn't be nearly as good as this.
Copyrighting. /post
But seriously, I knew in preschool if I copied someone's work and wrote it a little differently, I wouldn't get a gold star or whatever, I would be sent to the corner. Replace that with money, and... I think you get my drift.
Thank you Lilyo, for explaining this the best way possible. This was the reason that his first thread was lockified.
Oh, gee, isn't it just common courtesy? And also, I know it's somewhere. I will be back with my handy dandy rulebook. brb ballin
Never saw that. Link me the post/thread.
And then the authors would come and anally rape you to hell, getting your thread locked.
...
viewtopic.php?f=1021&t=3862
You're getting traffic due to material that is not your own. Mirroring it does not entitle you to make money off of it in any way...
All I'm asking is for you to post a quote from each one down at the bottom of the post or something...
Getting permission doesn't equal just sending them a PM without them responding. JohnSmith, for example, hasn't been online for almost a week now...
Simply post what they said and it'll all be fine then :/
Not to be a ****, but isn't that one happened to your last thread? Also here's the link you asked for: viewtopic.php?f=1032&t=294182
Yes permission must be obtained. I have it. Go away.
Uh no, genius. I got responses well over a week ago. Can everyone just drop this now? If a moderator would like proof of permission, PM me. If anyone else wants proof, too bad. I don't feel like posting my PM's here.
adf.ly links were removed (removing the older versions atm)
The authors know that I have their permission. Does this not make sense to you?
Ja, that's why I said that.
Edit: You should check out how many "yes's" are here: viewtopic.php?f=1021&t=334022
As you may have read above, JohnSmith hasn't been online for a week. That's just a pain in everyone's ass to get them all to post here. None of you should be concerned with any permission unless you have works in this pack (which you do not).
Doku's a bit of a pompous ass imo.
Mod edit: Warn issued for flaming (in this case: calling a user "pompous ass").
I can give confirmation of permission. I'm just not giving it to you. Like I said, if a moderator wants to see it, he can PM me.
And I don't really care what you think either.
not cool man
I guess you can't read.