Read this before you make a 'hd realistic high res' pack
this thread is not here to discuss my opinion
for ****s sake, stop using google images to find textures for your mobs and/or blocks.
it looks like ****.
I quoted myself there.
Too many times i see something that tries to be REALISTIC or HD or HIGH RES in Minecraft (and we are talking about a game where everything is blocks. EVERYTHING. ON JAVA.) and then you can clearly see, some textures (about 90% of all the hd-highres-realistic-packs bookshelves and pumpkins) are straight off google images.
some of those things even look creepy and bad at the same time (if they do that with the mobs.)
it doesnt look good, you did NOT do well if you did that, and it doesnt look good.
i wont post examples, it would be a bit too offensive.
needless to say i cant understand why people like those 'hd textures super realistic highres-pack' (i say it so many times because maybe you will read it, and actually think about it, how dumb this is in a game like minecraft. minecraft has many ways to look good, and realism isnt one of them.)
on a sidenote: there are too many of those packs, too. almost as many as those 'simple' packs, but atleast they look decent.
I made an account just to agree. I browse these forums for a long time already, mostly for the mods and texturepacks, and those are just my thoughts.
It doesnt look good at all, it does NEVER tile, it doesnt look realistic, its obvious that most textures come from a google-search for 'stone', 'sand' or in 100% of the cases, 'pumpkin'
Your voice has been heard already. Granted.. I am no fan of copy-pasta-craft and I don't use anything over 32x32.. But live and let live. If people want to make or use them, who is to say they can't? No body forces anybody to download anything. This thread can only exist for 3 reasons.
1. You actually think that this will stop people
1b. It wont
2. You think that they waste space on the texture pack forums
2b.The Irony of wasting space on the forums to complain about wasted forum space is almost unbearable.
3. You like to voice your opinion as if you are some kind of authority on these forums and you are looking for validation
3b. you aren't and you won't get any.
I made an account just to agree. I browse these forums for a long time already, mostly for the mods and texturepacks, and those are just my thoughts.
It doesnt look good at all, it does NEVER tile, it doesnt look realistic, its obvious that most textures come from a google-search for 'stone', 'sand' or in 100% of the cases, 'pumpkin'
Your voice has been heard already. Granted.. I am no fan of copy-pasta-craft and I don't use anything over 32x32.. But live and let live. If people want to make or use them, who is to say they can't? No body forces anybody to download anything. This thread can only exist for 3 reasons.
1. You actually think that this will stop people
1b. It wont
2. You think that they waste space on the texture pack forums
2b.The Irony of wasting space on the forums to complain about wasted forum space is almost unbearable.
3. You like to voice your opinion as if you are some kind of authority on these forums and you are looking for validation
3b. you aren't and you won't get any.
I made an account just to agree. I browse these forums for a long time already, mostly for the mods and texturepacks, and those are just my thoughts.
It doesnt look good at all, it does NEVER tile, it doesnt look realistic, its obvious that most textures come from a google-search for 'stone', 'sand' or in 100% of the cases, 'pumpkin'
Your voice has been heard already. Granted.. I am no fan of copy-pasta-craft and I don't use anything over 32x32.. But live and let live. If people want to make or use them, who is to say they can't? No body forces anybody to download anything. This thread can only exist for 3 reasons.
1. You actually think that this will stop people
1b. It wont
2. You think that they waste space on the texture pack forums
2b.The Irony of wasting space on the forums to complain about wasted forum space is almost unbearable.
3. You like to voice your opinion as if you are some kind of authority on these forums and you are looking for validation
3b. you aren't and you won't get any.
This thread completely full of OPINIONS, none of which I agree with.
I'm really sick of everyone who thinks that the "hd realistic packs" aren't "retro" enough for them. This thread needs to be closed for irrelevancy.
updated the op because some people cant tell the difference between a fact and an opinion.
Actually, maybe they don't agree with you.
Even though copypasta textures are ugly, do you expect people to draw their own tiles? That's over 16000 pixels for just 128x128 textures and it's bloody hard to draw by hand.
This thread completely full of OPINIONS, none of which I agree with.
I'm really sick of everyone who thinks that the "hd realistic packs" aren't "retro" enough for them. This thread needs to be closed for irrelevancy.
Shut up, make you own pack.
Grow up
read the ****ing op.
just read it. read the whole of it. not just the first line.
Blue = fact. none of those facts are saying anything about hd-textures in general.
only the fact, that using google images to get your textures is shitty and dumb.
red = my opinions.
you dont have to agree with my opinions. i dont care if you do. i just made this thread for people who plan on making a hd-texturepack. so they dont fail horribly at it. (read the title again. 'read this before you make a hd pack')
its my opinions. i can have opinions. my opinion is, hd-texturepacks are bad. if you cant deal with my opinion, YOU need to grow up.
also, i would love if everyone would just tell you 'you cant do it better'
imagine what would happen to a restaurant, or a lawyer. 'BUT YOU CANT MAKE BETTER FILET MIGNON, YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE AN OPINION ABOUT FILET MIGNONS.'
updated the op because some people cant tell the difference between a fact and an opinion.
Actually, maybe they don't agree with you.
Even though copypasta textures are ugly, do you expect people to draw their own tiles? That's over 16000 pixels for just 128x128 textures and it's bloody hard to draw by hand.
yes, yes infact i do.
if you make a hd-texturepack, it should be clear you need to work on it to make it good.
im aware many people dont agree with me, but the only thing they seem to read is the 'my opinion is, hd textures are bad anyways' part.
Too many times i see something that tries to be REALISTIC or HD or HIGH RES in Minecraft (and we are talking about a game where everything is blocks. EVERYTHING. ON JAVA.) and then you can clearly see, some textures (about 90% of all the hd-highres-realistic-packs bookshelves and pumpkins) are straight off google images.
some of those things even look creepy and bad at the same time (if they do that with the mobs.)
it doesnt look good, you did NOT do well if you did that, and it doesnt look good.
i wont post examples, it would be a bit too offensive.
Fixed.
red = opinion
blue = fact
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
When all is said and done, Will you have said more than you have done?
updated the op because some people cant tell the difference between a fact and an opinion.
Actually, maybe they don't agree with you.
Even though copypasta textures are ugly, do you expect people to draw their own tiles? That's over 16000 pixels for just 128x128 textures and it's bloody hard to draw by hand.
yes, yes infact i do.
if you make a hd-texturepack, it should be clear you need to work on it to make it good.
im aware many people dont agree with me, but the only thing they seem to read is the 'my opinion is, hd textures are bad anyways' part.
...there's actually no way to make something that HD without
- hand-drawing it
- using a picture
- using a noise effect or something similar on a blank background
I mean, could you draw a picture? Sharpening things is fairly easy, but eventually it gets ridiculous.
im talking about people using things straight off google images.
(guess whose texturepack this is)
as you can see the sponge and the bookshelf have something in common.
now, when you look at the mobspawner, it shows that the creator couldnt google 'mob spawner' and find something neat.
and yeah thanks cobra, i just split it in two parts. will edit the op like that
for ****s sake, stop using google images to find textures for your mobs and/or blocks.
it looks like ****.
I quoted myself there.
Too many times i see something that tries to be REALISTIC or HD or HIGH RES in Minecraft (and we are talking about a game where everything is blocks. EVERYTHING. ON JAVA.) and then you can clearly see, some textures (about 90% of all the hd-highres-realistic-packs bookshelves and pumpkins) are straight off google images.
some of those things even look creepy and bad at the same time (if they do that with the mobs.)
it doesnt look good, you did NOT do well if you did that, and it doesnt look good.
i wont post examples, it would be a bit too offensive.
needless to say i cant understand why people like those 'hd textures super realistic highres-pack' (i say it so many times because maybe you will read it, and actually think about it, how dumb this is in a game like minecraft. minecraft has many ways to look good, and realism isnt one of them.)
on a sidenote: there are too many of those packs, too. almost as many as those 'simple' packs, but atleast they look decent.
i made it coloured for you.
red = opinion
blue = fact
its sad you guys cant tell
implying anyone actually cares what your opinion is, some people like texture packs that are copied from images, you know, there is a whole art style based of copy-past images, so kindly do what any decent person does, and stop saying the same opinionated **** over and over again like it will have some effect, like history said, you have no authority, and you are by no means the be all and end all opinion, or even a consensus.
Again, your entire first post is OPINION. Maybe you should read it through more than once, dipshit.
Oh, and thanks for posting part of my terrain.png because you are so dedicated for finding a single flaw that you downloaded my pack, albeit I haven't worked on that tile yet, but none the less you want to drive it home with one issue. Congratulations on finding absolutely nothing and making yourself look like a complete dumbass, in my OPINION.
Basically what you are saying is that all the hd packs should spend hundreds of hours of our lives just to make a single tile of grass look realistic. I'm sure it's damn difficult to draw the 4 pixels you usually get per square. (I would know how simple it is because I used to draw sprites as a hobby. Kirby was a favorite. >.>)
That being said, I'm letting this thread die. I'll read your response and respect it, but won't reply.
Again, your entire first post is OPINION. Maybe you should read it through more than once, dipshit.
Oh, and thanks for posting part of my terrain.png because you are so dedicated for finding a single flaw that you downloaded my pack, albeit I haven't worked on that tile yet, but none the less you want to drive it home with one issue. Congratulations on finding absolutely nothing and making yourself look like a complete dumbass, in my OPINION.
Basically what you are saying is that all the hd packs should spend hundreds of hours of our lives just to make a single tile of grass look realistic. I'm sure it's damn difficult to draw the 4 pixels you usually get per square. (I would know how simple it is because I used to draw sprites as a hobby. Kirby was a favorite. >.>)
That being said, I'm letting this thread die. I'll read your response and respect it, but won't reply.
EDIT:
Seems like he has a lot of friends. /sarcasm
didnt read lol
all i could tell is that youre mad and buttangry now.
enjoy me not giving a flying **** about your opinion, but its funny that you do.
this thread is not here to discuss my opinion
I quoted myself there.
Too many times i see something that tries to be REALISTIC or HD or HIGH RES in Minecraft (and we are talking about a game where everything is blocks. EVERYTHING. ON JAVA.) and then you can clearly see, some textures (about 90% of all the hd-highres-realistic-packs bookshelves and pumpkins) are straight off google images.
some of those things even look creepy and bad at the same time (if they do that with the mobs.)
it doesnt look good, you did NOT do well if you did that, and it doesnt look good.
i wont post examples, it would be a bit too offensive.
needless to say i cant understand why people like those 'hd textures super realistic highres-pack' (i say it so many times because maybe you will read it, and actually think about it, how dumb this is in a game like minecraft. minecraft has many ways to look good, and realism isnt one of them.)
on a sidenote: there are too many of those packs, too. almost as many as those 'simple' packs, but atleast they look decent.
i made it coloured for you.
red = opinion
blue = fact
its sad you guys cant tell
/thread
Cube Craft, a simple pack by me!
no.
copying images off google images IS BAD. its not my opinion. it just is.
Your voice has been heard already. Granted.. I am no fan of copy-pasta-craft and I don't use anything over 32x32.. But live and let live. If people want to make or use them, who is to say they can't? No body forces anybody to download anything. This thread can only exist for 3 reasons.
1. You actually think that this will stop people
1b. It wont
2. You think that they waste space on the texture pack forums
2b.The Irony of wasting space on the forums to complain about wasted forum space is almost unbearable.
3. You like to voice your opinion as if you are some kind of authority on these forums and you are looking for validation
3b. you aren't and you won't get any.
ps. where is your IGN? if its fandan. HASPAID
yeah or you know, im just saying copying images off google doesnt make a texturepack.
the whole rest is my opinion.
also, what is it with you guys checking everyones account? deal with pirates.
check for finedandy.
thats actually the first time I did that heh.. I don't care if you paid honestly.. I was just trying to drive the point home.
I just happen to be more tired of people talking about copy-crafts then the copy-crafts them selves is all.
i love the HD packs, but i also dont expect them to magically look and feel like (insert random high powered game here)
I expect them to be something different than "Stock"
i appreciate that, even though i dont like high res packs. at least you can tell those textures have been worked for.
I'm really sick of everyone who thinks that the "hd realistic packs" aren't "retro" enough for them. This thread needs to be closed for irrelevancy.
Shut up, make you own pack.
Grow up
Actually, maybe they don't agree with you.
Even though copypasta textures are ugly, do you expect people to draw their own tiles? That's over 16000 pixels for just 128x128 textures and it's bloody hard to draw by hand.
Support the Slime Update!
read the ****ing op.
just read it. read the whole of it. not just the first line.
Blue = fact. none of those facts are saying anything about hd-textures in general.
only the fact, that using google images to get your textures is shitty and dumb.
red = my opinions.
you dont have to agree with my opinions. i dont care if you do. i just made this thread for people who plan on making a hd-texturepack. so they dont fail horribly at it. (read the title again. 'read this before you make a hd pack')
its my opinions. i can have opinions. my opinion is, hd-texturepacks are bad. if you cant deal with my opinion, YOU need to grow up.
also, i would love if everyone would just tell you 'you cant do it better'
imagine what would happen to a restaurant, or a lawyer. 'BUT YOU CANT MAKE BETTER FILET MIGNON, YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE AN OPINION ABOUT FILET MIGNONS.'
yes, yes infact i do.
if you make a hd-texturepack, it should be clear you need to work on it to make it good.
im aware many people dont agree with me, but the only thing they seem to read is the 'my opinion is, hd textures are bad anyways' part.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse PremiumFixed.
red = opinion
blue = fact
...there's actually no way to make something that HD without
- hand-drawing it
- using a picture
- using a noise effect or something similar on a blank background
I mean, could you draw a picture? Sharpening things is fairly easy, but eventually it gets ridiculous.
Support the Slime Update!
(guess whose texturepack this is)
as you can see the sponge and the bookshelf have something in common.
now, when you look at the mobspawner, it shows that the creator couldnt google 'mob spawner' and find something neat.
and yeah thanks cobra, i just split it in two parts. will edit the op like that
implying anyone actually cares what your opinion is, some people like texture packs that are copied from images, you know, there is a whole art style based of copy-past images, so kindly do what any decent person does, and stop saying the same opinionated **** over and over again like it will have some effect, like history said, you have no authority, and you are by no means the be all and end all opinion, or even a consensus.
Oh, and thanks for posting part of my terrain.png because you are so dedicated for finding a single flaw that you downloaded my pack, albeit I haven't worked on that tile yet, but none the less you want to drive it home with one issue. Congratulations on finding absolutely nothing and making yourself look like a complete dumbass, in my OPINION.
Basically what you are saying is that all the hd packs should spend hundreds of hours of our lives just to make a single tile of grass look realistic. I'm sure it's damn difficult to draw the 4 pixels you usually get per square. (I would know how simple it is because I used to draw sprites as a hobby. Kirby was a favorite. >.>)
That being said, I'm letting this thread die. I'll read your response and respect it, but won't reply.
EDIT:
Seems like he has a lot of friends. /sarcasm
didnt read lol
all i could tell is that youre mad and buttangry now.
enjoy me not giving a flying **** about your opinion, but its funny that you do.
also, /xy is so 2002.