I don't mind HD packs, but anything above 64x64 is just ridiculous. Due to size constraints, most higher than 64, just end up looking like blurry 64x64 anyway. And 256x256 is way stupid...the entire original terrain.png is 256x256 and you want to put that on a block?
They should start giving out 2 week forum/game bans for topics like these! that will learn ya!
I know right, if you don't like something... don't download it... It's all free anyway right?
I wish people would finish school instead of dropping out...
I don't mind HD packs, but anything above 64x64 is just ridiculous. Due to size constraints, most higher than 64, just end up looking like blurry 64x64 anyway...
Yep. Blurry. I can hardly make anything out at all. I mean look at those characters on the ivory lanterns. Are they guys or girls? And those cherries on the cake; maraschino or bing? Who can tell? sheeeesh!
I don't mind HD packs, but anything above 64x64 is just ridiculous. Due to size constraints, most higher than 64, just end up looking like blurry 64x64 anyway...
Yep. Blurry. I can hardly make anything out at all. I mean look at those characters on the ivory lanterns. Are they guys or girls? And those cherries on the cake; maraschino or bing? Who can tell? sheeeesh!
I don't mind HD packs, but anything above 64x64 is just ridiculous. Due to size constraints, most higher than 64, just end up looking like blurry 64x64 anyway...
Yep. Blurry. I can hardly make anything out at all. I mean look at those characters on the ivory lanterns. Are they guys or girls? And those cherries on the cake; maraschino or bing? Who can tell? sheeeesh!
Ah yes, thanks for a lovely example! This is the beauty of a 64x64. I mean just look at the....what?...oh it's not 64x64? Well at that size you can't see the difference so, oops, my bad.
I don't mind HD packs, but anything above 64x64 is just ridiculous. Due to size constraints, most higher than 64, just end up looking like blurry 64x64 anyway...
Yep. Blurry. I can hardly make anything out at all. I mean look at those characters on the ivory lanterns. Are they guys or girls? And those cherries on the cake; maraschino or bing? Who can tell? sheeeesh!
Ah yes, thanks for a lovely example! This is the beauty of a 64x64. I mean just look at the....what?...oh it's not 64x64? Well at that size you can't see the difference so, oops, my bad.
I don't mind HD packs, but anything above 64x64 is just ridiculous. Due to size constraints, most higher than 64, just end up looking like blurry 64x64 anyway...
Yep. Blurry. I can hardly make anything out at all. I mean look at those characters on the ivory lanterns. Are they guys or girls? And those cherries on the cake; maraschino or bing? Who can tell? sheeeesh!
While I can see the effort you have put in, putting huge textures on low res models is bad, no exceptions. Especially the wheat
You know, you remind me of a child who cannot get something HIGHER than 64 to work... which is why you don't like them. Not our fault you're poor.
Like I said if you don't like something... kindly walk past it...
Do you seriously stand outside of a porn shop and shout "This shiz is wrong, god will burn all of you"
or do you stand outside of churches that you pass and say "This is wrong, how do you know he's UP there?!"
or do you walk past some person with a dog and say "THIS SHIZ IS WRONG!!! It's too small and shouldn't existtttt"
or do you walk into a womens clothes store and say "This shiz is wrong, women shouldn't be so revealing" "But its underwear sir..." "Thats not the point!"
or do you walk past a golf field and shout "This shiz is wrong, you guys are boring!"
I could go on and on and on and on and on...
Same process runs right through here... if you don't believe in it... yet other people do... What makes YOUR opinion the RIGHT opinion?
Keep it to yourself :biggrin.gif:
Here is my terrain.png :smile.gif: It had to be resized though as it was over 11MB in size and most sites wouldn't allow me to upload it... Don't sorry I only changed format from png to jpg and so the size is still the same :smile.gif:
Oh wait is that too BIG and not blurry? Sorry... my bad... I'll use an simg now...
While I can see the effort you have put in, putting huge textures on low res models is bad, no exceptions. Especially the wheat
I too feel there's a strong current of pixel envy in every anti-HD rant on this board. But who am I to judge?
When someone comes up with a single valid argument for why more pixels equates to less quality I'll stand up and say "Well, you're absolutely right and I've been a fool". But the facts are clear and undeniable.
Wrapping ANY texture around a cube results in a cube. This does not factor into the debate.
I can create a perfect reproduction of any 16 pixel pack in any higher resolution.
No 16 pixel pack can reproduce the appearance of any pack of higher resolution.
Therefore I conclude that the only pertinent feature of ANY texture pack at ANY resolution is the appearance.
So it comes down to "Do you like it?" and that is your own opinion and nothing more. And everyone's got an opinion and an asshole but others are not often interested in seeing either of them.
In the meantime I'll continue loving my 256x256 texture pack as a lovely rebellion to your post :biggrin.gif:
I know right, if you don't like something... don't download it... It's all free anyway right?
I wish people would finish school instead of dropping out...
In the mean time...
...I'll be enjoying this
(Puts on flame shield for advertising)
viewtopic.php?f=1021&t=136785
*Cough* *Cough*
I do what I can. :biggrin.gif:
looks like it was a flame that never burned.. O.o
Yep. Blurry. I can hardly make anything out at all. I mean look at those characters on the ivory lanterns. Are they guys or girls? And those cherries on the cake; maraschino or bing? Who can tell? sheeeesh!
Well done. :wink.gif:
Ah yes, thanks for a lovely example! This is the beauty of a 64x64. I mean just look at the....what?...oh it's not 64x64? Well at that size you can't see the difference so, oops, my bad.
He he. You did click it right?
AKA enjoying LOL SO HD XXXXDDD
While I can see the effort you have put in, putting huge textures on low res models is bad, no exceptions. Especially the wheat
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse PremiumLink in signature.
Thank you! That's what I was trying to say! Anything higher than 64x won't matter, and 64x is pushing it.
"TROOOOOOOOOOLLLL"
You know, you remind me of a child who cannot get something HIGHER than 64 to work... which is why you don't like them. Not our fault you're poor.
Like I said if you don't like something... kindly walk past it...
Do you seriously stand outside of a porn shop and shout "This shiz is wrong, god will burn all of you"
or do you stand outside of churches that you pass and say "This is wrong, how do you know he's UP there?!"
or do you walk past some person with a dog and say "THIS SHIZ IS WRONG!!! It's too small and shouldn't existtttt"
or do you walk into a womens clothes store and say "This shiz is wrong, women shouldn't be so revealing" "But its underwear sir..." "Thats not the point!"
or do you walk past a golf field and shout "This shiz is wrong, you guys are boring!"
I could go on and on and on and on and on...
Same process runs right through here... if you don't believe in it... yet other people do... What makes YOUR opinion the RIGHT opinion?
Keep it to yourself :biggrin.gif:
Here is my terrain.png :smile.gif: It had to be resized though as it was over 11MB in size and most sites wouldn't allow me to upload it... Don't sorry I only changed format from png to jpg and so the size is still the same :smile.gif:
Oh wait is that too BIG and not blurry? Sorry... my bad... I'll use an simg now...
Wow. Just, wow. Glad to see I was able to let you unleash all your RAEG today. You're welcome.
I too feel there's a strong current of pixel envy in every anti-HD rant on this board. But who am I to judge?
When someone comes up with a single valid argument for why more pixels equates to less quality I'll stand up and say "Well, you're absolutely right and I've been a fool". But the facts are clear and undeniable.
Wrapping ANY texture around a cube results in a cube. This does not factor into the debate.
I can create a perfect reproduction of any 16 pixel pack in any higher resolution.
No 16 pixel pack can reproduce the appearance of any pack of higher resolution.
Therefore I conclude that the only pertinent feature of ANY texture pack at ANY resolution is the appearance.
So it comes down to "Do you like it?" and that is your own opinion and nothing more. And everyone's got an opinion and an asshole but others are not often interested in seeing either of them.