i am in desperate need of a realistic (with even an RPGic feel) 16x16 texture pack with completely changed GUIs and items, along with terrain, i already know fo a couple and i use them (eldpack, Doku's rpg pack and painterly). i'm not a fan of the quanderly (or whatever it is) pack though, and i want something that keeps the feel of miencraft like the eldpack does with the items.
16x16 doesn't allow for the really hi res stuff...is all I meant. There are a ton of packs in 16x16 that are awesome. But when i see "realistic" in the same sentence...I kinda smirk. Not gonna happen. If you think there's one that's realistic...great. But to me, it's not gonna happen.
but there are awesome artists making it close...fur sure
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"This may hurt a little, but it's something you'll get used to...."
16x16 doesn't allow for the really hi res stuff...is all I meant. There are a ton of packs in 16x16 that are awesome. But when i see "realistic" in the same sentence...I kinda smirk. Not gonna happen. If you think there's one that's realistic...great. But to me, it's not gonna happen.
but there are awesome artists making it close...fur sure
hi-res doesnt always mean realistic (or vice versa, idk). lol
16x16 doesn't allow for the really hi res stuff...is all I meant. There are a ton of packs in 16x16 that are awesome. But when i see "realistic" in the same sentence...I kinda smirk. Not gonna happen. If you think there's one that's realistic...great. But to me, it's not gonna happen.
but there are awesome artists making it close...fur sure
Have you checked out Sanguins Subsumption's 16 pixel version? It's as realistic as I could make 16 pixels look. It does have a flaw in the glass. There's no anything there. I'll update it as soon as I have time, but I'm extremely busy and haven't had a chance. Also, it's just the terrain at the moment, I haven't redone Sanguine's GUI mobs etc in 16 yet. Also in the hopper...
Here's the terrain...
Hmmm... Odd, it looks like I fixed the glass and forgot I did it. Or the minecraft gnomes did it for me.
16x16 doesn't allow for the really hi res stuff...is all I meant. There are a ton of packs in 16x16 that are awesome. But when i see "realistic" in the same sentence...I kinda smirk. Not gonna happen. If you think there's one that's realistic...great. But to me, it's not gonna happen.
but there are awesome artists making it close...fur sure
Have you checked out Sanguins Subsumption's 16 pixel version? It's as realistic as I could make 16 pixels look. It does have a flaw in the glass. There's no anything there. I'll update it as soon as I have time, but I'm extremely busy and haven't had a chance. Also, it's just the terrain at the moment, I haven't redone Sanguine's GUI mobs etc in 16 yet. Also in the hopper...
Here's the terrain...
Hmmm... Odd, it looks like I fixed the glass and forgot I did it. Or the minecraft gnomes did it for me.
I did...and your work rules
I guess what I was saying is taken wrong. At 16x16, there's only so far you can go. but you and others have done a great job. I just see "realistic" thrown around so much here.
Before I have to backpedal more...I'll stop there.
(me thinks people need to also understand, not just read, posts here)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"This may hurt a little, but it's something you'll get used to...."
I guess what I was saying is taken wrong. At 16x16, there's only so far you can go. but you and others have done a great job. I just see "realistic" thrown around so much here.
I get ya. You're right. There's only so far you can go with so few pixels. And it's nowhere near realistic in any reasonable sense of the word. Only in comparison can that term even be considered not "completely wrong".
I guess what I was saying is taken wrong. At 16x16, there's only so far you can go. but you and others have done a great job. I just see "realistic" thrown around so much here.
I get ya. You're right. There's only so far you can go with so few pixels. And it's nowhere near realistic in any reasonable sense of the word. Only in comparison can that term even be considered not "completely wrong".
Yep....so what I'm now saying is
There's good examples that might suit ya!!
:tongue.gif:
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"This may hurt a little, but it's something you'll get used to...."
I guess what I was saying is taken wrong. At 16x16, there's only so far you can go. but you and others have done a great job. I just see "realistic" thrown around so much here.
I get ya. You're right. There's only so far you can go with so few pixels. And it's nowhere near realistic in any reasonable sense of the word. Only in comparison can that term even be considered not "completely wrong".
If you want to get technical, it depends what your definition of "real" is.
What's realistic to someone who's colorblind? Or someone who lives in an underground bunker their whole life?
Realistic moon textures, for example, would be far different from realistic underwater textures
Every texture on this forum is a realistic minecraft texture, because all of them ARE minecraft textures
Realism is circumstantial, it can be seen in different ways, what is real to me is not always real to you
I guess what I was saying is taken wrong. At 16x16, there's only so far you can go. but you and others have done a great job. I just see "realistic" thrown around so much here.
I get ya. You're right. There's only so far you can go with so few pixels. And it's nowhere near realistic in any reasonable sense of the word. Only in comparison can that term even be considered not "completely wrong".
If you want to get technical, it depends what your definition of "real" is.
What's realistic to someone who's colorblind? Or someone who lives in an underground bunker their whole life?
Realistic moon textures, for example, would be far different from realistic underwater textures
Every texture on this forum is a realistic minecraft texture, because all of them ARE minecraft textures
Realism is circumstantial, it can be seen in different ways, what is real to me is not always real to you
Food for thought...
That's DEEP Koolwitak! Easily in the lava range if not approaching adminium. I dig it!
i don't think my texturepacks are realistic at all xD but if they are not seen they don't exist!
No...it was finished when said 16x16 is limited. I don't know what all the other stuff is even posted for...
Sample would be better than tryin to defeat what i said. Which was more in passing than absolutism. Having done texturing now and in the past, i can still say it's harder to get to realism in 16x. You can keep pounding on the carcass of the horse all you want though. Sitting around the 16x campfire singing songs. Doesn't make what I said wrong...unless you take it that way.
nuff said maybe?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"This may hurt a little, but it's something you'll get used to...."
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Thanks to any1 who posts a pack i like!
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired Staff"This may hurt a little, but it's something you'll get used to...."
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired StaffO.o
16x16 doesn't really allow for much realism. Any pack made, or any texture done in 16x16 may look cool, but realistic? Not so much.
"This may hurt a little, but it's something you'll get used to...."
well im not entirely going for realistic, just a cool realistic-ish, rpg kind of look. not completely realistic. like the eldpack
if you mean teh japaninja thingy, i like teh textures, but not so much the GUI or item sprites.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired Staff16x16 doesn't allow for the really hi res stuff...is all I meant. There are a ton of packs in 16x16 that are awesome. But when i see "realistic" in the same sentence...I kinda smirk. Not gonna happen. If you think there's one that's realistic...great. But to me, it's not gonna happen.
but there are awesome artists making it close...fur sure
"This may hurt a little, but it's something you'll get used to...."
hi-res doesnt always mean realistic (or vice versa, idk). lol
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=76876
Have you checked out Sanguins Subsumption's 16 pixel version? It's as realistic as I could make 16 pixels look. It does have a flaw in the glass. There's no anything there. I'll update it as soon as I have time, but I'm extremely busy and haven't had a chance. Also, it's just the terrain at the moment, I haven't redone Sanguine's GUI mobs etc in 16 yet. Also in the hopper...
Here's the terrain...
Hmmm... Odd, it looks like I fixed the glass and forgot I did it. Or the minecraft gnomes did it for me.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired StaffI did...and your work rules
I guess what I was saying is taken wrong. At 16x16, there's only so far you can go. but you and others have done a great job. I just see "realistic" thrown around so much here.
Before I have to backpedal more...I'll stop there.
(me thinks people need to also understand, not just read, posts here)
"This may hurt a little, but it's something you'll get used to...."
I get ya. You're right. There's only so far you can go with so few pixels. And it's nowhere near realistic in any reasonable sense of the word. Only in comparison can that term even be considered not "completely wrong".
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired StaffYep....so what I'm now saying is
There's good examples that might suit ya!!
:tongue.gif:
"This may hurt a little, but it's something you'll get used to...."
If you want to get technical, it depends what your definition of "real" is.
What's realistic to someone who's colorblind? Or someone who lives in an underground bunker their whole life?
Realistic moon textures, for example, would be far different from realistic underwater textures
Every texture on this forum is a realistic minecraft texture, because all of them ARE minecraft textures
Realism is circumstantial, it can be seen in different ways, what is real to me is not always real to you
Food for thought...
That's DEEP Koolwitak! Easily in the lava range if not approaching adminium. I dig it!
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Retired StaffNo...it was finished when said 16x16 is limited. I don't know what all the other stuff is even posted for...
Sample would be better than tryin to defeat what i said. Which was more in passing than absolutism. Having done texturing now and in the past, i can still say it's harder to get to realism in 16x. You can keep pounding on the carcass of the horse all you want though. Sitting around the 16x campfire singing songs. Doesn't make what I said wrong...unless you take it that way.
nuff said maybe?
"This may hurt a little, but it's something you'll get used to...."