So I asked people if arma three was any good and they said it was ok, so now i am asking if arma 2 is better and if so, if it worth me buying? Also please tell me if the game does not have any people playing multiplayer on it anymore, thanks!
It has thousands still playing DayZ additions, and there is a lot of wasteland/domination other that there a few that are focused on player vs AI.
Arma II certianly has a lot more going for it but things like Arma III movement controls cannot simply be ignored because even if they are similar its still a huge step in the right direction. But if you don't have experience then you won't notice that. But the same learning curve is still in Arma II then Arma III has.
The way I figure it, there are a lot of people playing 2 because it's more mature of a game (something like four DLCs) whereas 3 is newer. It's also got DayZ going for it.
However, I don't really like to switch between the two because 3 is just so much more fluid.
ArmA II isn't a good game as much as it's a fun game. I really enjoy ArmA II and it's MUCH better with servers/friends. Iove the editor and Wasteland is a blast. The singleplayer is confusing and doesn't have much explanation but a good pickup if it's on sale and even more if you have friends.
Arma II certianly has a lot more going for it but things like Arma III movement controls cannot simply be ignored because even if they are similar its still a huge step in the right direction. But if you don't have experience then you won't notice that. But the same learning curve is still in Arma II then Arma III has.
However, I don't really like to switch between the two because 3 is just so much more fluid.