I usually lie about drugs. I tell people I do them all the time and that I'm experienced. This is usually to convince them to do bad things that I find outrageously funny. Don't Take My Advice or Stories as real or literal. They are probably made up. Also, I'm not SWIM... just for the record...
To whatever poor sod sacrificed time, effort, and small children to the dark gods in order to convince Mojang to implement horses: Thank you, from the bottom of my heart. You have fought long and hard for a great many unheard voices in the community. Your efforts will be remembered for ages to come.
(No, really. By the time VR comes out, Minecraft is going to be f***ing amazing at the rate things are going!)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Mod ideas in my profile info! Send me a message or post in one of the threads if you're interested.
To touch Divinity, one must first be prepared to brave reality.
You bring up a good point there! I actually wish Minecraft had more unique mobs that it could be known for, unlike the generic skeleton archers and zombies and big spiders.
Dogs and cats.
I still believe they've added those for the sake of popularity of those animal.
Meanwhile they've made pig ride-able. Not so convinient though.
They've also said there won't be horses.
Now they say they are adding horse. (Very clear with photo and mention of mob mod author)
"Don't use horse if you don't like!"
I don't hate at all the horses in real world. I don't want to even see them in minecraft.
Many wouldn't recognize but horses are one of icon of war. Which is far from minecraft theme.
And also unlike redstone, they roam and will be treated as living animal. There presence is more
large and defines land scape in various locations.
What happened to mojang? Why they've dropped original feel? Adding horse is surely a one step
down.
Wait a second... Wouldn't a better title for this be "Minecraft 1.6! Now with 100% more horses, because it's easier to add a horse than make the API work!" or maybe "Minecraft 1.6, the Horsecraft Update! Because that guy from Bukkit isn't working out after all!"
Now I'm all for new content, but I am also for functionality, and for keeping promises. If you can't do the API, just say it! There's also a source for horses that would require little or no work on the part of Mojang, "Mo'Creatures." That's right, the mod that gets avoided every time the top ten Minecraft mods are mentioned. I'm conflicted about this, because while I love the mod, relying on third party content usually marks the beginning of the end for the in-house creative process.
You remember the creative process, right? The process by which Mojang defined what the API could do, while they were still in the stages of asking modders what it SHOULD be able to do? How well has that worked out?
Dogs and cats.
I still believe they've added those for the sake of popularity of those animal.
Meanwhile they've made pig ride-able. Not so convinient though.
They've also said there won't be horses.
Now they say they are adding horse. (Very clear with photo and mention of mob mod author)
"Don't use horse if you don't like!"
I don't hate at all the horses in real world. I don't want to even see them in minecraft.
Many wouldn't recognize but horses are one of icon of war. Which is far from minecraft theme.
And also unlike redstone, they roam and will be treated as living animal. There presence is more
large and defines land scape in various locations.
What happened to mojang? Why they've dropped original feel? Adding horse is surely a one step
down.
Because zombies and tnt and bows and swords aren't icons of war? Or is it because you can't dream of a scantly clad female, her long hair flowing in the wind, riding barebacked across an open prairie, without thinking of war? Please.
Because zombies and tnt and bows and swords aren't icons of war? Or is it because you can't dream of a scantly clad female, her long hair flowing in the wind, riding barebacked across an open prairie, without thinking of war? Please.
Swodrs and bows: Personal defense tools.
TNT: as this is building and mining game
Horses: Fast Mobility = War and Civilization. Those are in pair.
Calling them reminds of war is one way to say no to horse in minecraft.
Pigs are there. All they've got to do is elaborate on pig and pig riding.
Dogs and cats.
I still believe they've added those for the sake of popularity of those animal.
Meanwhile they've made pig ride-able. Not so convinient though.
They've also said there won't be horses.
Now they say they are adding horse. (Very clear with photo and mention of mob mod author)
"Don't use horse if you don't like!"
I don't hate at all the horses in real world. I don't want to even see them in minecraft.
Many wouldn't recognize but horses are one of icon of war. Which is far from minecraft theme.
And also unlike redstone, they roam and will be treated as living animal. There presence is more
large and defines land scape in various locations.
What happened to mojang? Why they've dropped original feel? Adding horse is surely a one step
down.
I don't think anyone means for you to not use horses if you don't like them in real life. Just if you don't want to use them in Minecraft. Also, while horses used to be icons of war, that isn't how most people see them today. In fact, they're generally symbolic of peace and tranquility nowadays.
But you make a good point that I hadn't thought of about their presence in the landscape of Minecraft. If they are just as common in the wild as any other animal, that would make them a much more definable feature of the land than redstone would, which doesn't even appear aboveground at all. If you don't want to use horses, than they probably would feel forced upon you.
However, I don't think horses would ruin the feel of Minecraft. I'm assuming they would act as "companions," as dogs and cats are already, and will serve to assist the player with mobility, just as dogs assist with combat and cats for security against Creeepers.
But all of this is still speculation. We're not going to know how heavily they are going to influence the world until the first snapshots are released.
This will probably not be horses but instead something like a female model (an alternate to steve) or something like a new type of flower. It is not unknown for mojang to pull pranks like this, and have it as something from the background. :/
'
I like how everyone is all hyped up about the horses, yet i'm more excited about the aliens, rainbows, and the reason to fear going in the water without a boat.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
edit: With patent pending 4D rendering!
Already out there...google it.
but they better have saddle bags.
They better.
(No, really. By the time VR comes out, Minecraft is going to be f***ing amazing at the rate things are going!)
To touch Divinity, one must first be prepared to brave reality.
That is going to be so cool~
Dogs and cats.
I still believe they've added those for the sake of popularity of those animal.
Meanwhile they've made pig ride-able. Not so convinient though.
They've also said there won't be horses.
Now they say they are adding horse. (Very clear with photo and mention of mob mod author)
"Don't use horse if you don't like!"
I don't hate at all the horses in real world. I don't want to even see them in minecraft.
Many wouldn't recognize but horses are one of icon of war. Which is far from minecraft theme.
And also unlike redstone, they roam and will be treated as living animal. There presence is more
large and defines land scape in various locations.
What happened to mojang? Why they've dropped original feel? Adding horse is surely a one step
down.
Now I'm all for new content, but I am also for functionality, and for keeping promises. If you can't do the API, just say it! There's also a source for horses that would require little or no work on the part of Mojang, "Mo'Creatures." That's right, the mod that gets avoided every time the top ten Minecraft mods are mentioned. I'm conflicted about this, because while I love the mod, relying on third party content usually marks the beginning of the end for the in-house creative process.
You remember the creative process, right? The process by which Mojang defined what the API could do, while they were still in the stages of asking modders what it SHOULD be able to do? How well has that worked out?
Focus, Mojang, Focus.
Because zombies and tnt and bows and swords aren't icons of war? Or is it because you can't dream of a scantly clad female, her long hair flowing in the wind, riding barebacked across an open prairie, without thinking of war? Please.
Swodrs and bows: Personal defense tools.
TNT: as this is building and mining game
Horses: Fast Mobility = War and Civilization. Those are in pair.
Calling them reminds of war is one way to say no to horse in minecraft.
Pigs are there. All they've got to do is elaborate on pig and pig riding.
Yes, they do.
That is totally a sandwich.
I don't think anyone means for you to not use horses if you don't like them in real life. Just if you don't want to use them in Minecraft. Also, while horses used to be icons of war, that isn't how most people see them today. In fact, they're generally symbolic of peace and tranquility nowadays.
But you make a good point that I hadn't thought of about their presence in the landscape of Minecraft. If they are just as common in the wild as any other animal, that would make them a much more definable feature of the land than redstone would, which doesn't even appear aboveground at all. If you don't want to use horses, than they probably would feel forced upon you.
However, I don't think horses would ruin the feel of Minecraft. I'm assuming they would act as "companions," as dogs and cats are already, and will serve to assist the player with mobility, just as dogs assist with combat and cats for security against Creeepers.
But all of this is still speculation. We're not going to know how heavily they are going to influence the world until the first snapshots are released.
Actually that's a bagel.
'
Pretty sure Curse's Client had a way to bring minecraft back to a previous version. you could do that.