It needs to go to playstation, I mean seriously, I know it would probably be harder to do it but, Xbox is only getting this because Notch is doing it for the money now( no hate Notch if you happen to read this) But if you did it for ps3, well lets just say It would be better, In a VG-chart the amount of users for ps3 and Xbox-360 are almost Exactly aligned, the ps3 is just a little lower at the start.
K, so, here's the deal bros. While I agree that Minecraft probably shouldn't have been ported to Xbox, the simple fact of the matter is that the Minecraft online community is the worst online gaming community in the entire planet. As such, even the vile depths of Xbox Live can only be considered an improvement.
I love how that Shin kid is the only one freaking out and he keeps commenting like he's gonna make a difference.More money for Notch, more updates for minecraft, I don't see a ****ing problem.
Look everyone whos Whinging Minecraft is Notch's game so its his decision if he wants to add it to a console....And I presume it will have great potential on the xbox....So stop Whinging if you have a PS3 or hate the idea because in the end Notch's Word is final...OBEY NOTCH FOOLS
It's sad that some of you actually complain about this. There is no problem with Minecraft being on the 360. You ***** and whine just because Minecraft is no longer going to be exclusive, this is not affecting you in any way. Sure, some of the new players will join the forums but who cares? Notch is not betraying you in any way, he isn't even behind the development for the console port, it's a set of developers he is paying. You act like that once it is released, the game will become "tainted".
I can't get over that fact that most of you are actually upset over this, it's ridiculous. Apparently you are all spoiled, and can't handle being "the cool kid that owns something everyone else doesn't."
Why,XBOX 360? If your going to put it on a console then make it for every console. PS3,XBOX 360,PS2,PC,not Wii because Wii sucks,and maybe PSP.
The reason I say it should be on PS2 is because the game has low graphics anyway and would be kinda easy to blow off on them. Have the graphics on PS2 be like how you watch Minecraft videos on Youtube with 480p graphics.It's kinda like they did in GTA:San Andreas. They made the game look crappy for PS2 but good on PS3 and XBOX 360. You don't have to make it perfect,just do it,that's all I'm saying.
Why,XBOX 360? If your going to put it on a console then make it for every console. PS3,XBOX 360,PS2,PC,not Wii because Wii sucks,and maybe PSP.
The reason I say it should be on PS2 is because the game has low graphics anyway and would be kinda easy to blow off on them. Have the graphics on PS2 be like how you watch Minecraft videos on Youtube with 480p graphics.It's kinda like they did in GTA:San Andreas. They made the game look crappy for PS2 but good on PS3 and XBOX 360. You don't have to make it perfect,just do it,that's all I'm saying.
What the hell are you talking about? Why would you release something on an outdated console? And San Andreas came out on the PS2 and Xbox originally, so I don't know what you are saying there.
Why are u all upset about this ? its all good news! it means if u have a ebox 360 then its all good. it also is on android for it might be avalibe on ur phones too
LMFAO. Ignoring the blatant subjectivity and bias going on here, it's kind of ironic that you'd prioritize the PS2 of all things over the Wii - even though neither of them have the hardware capability to run Minecraft particularly well, the Wii is still quite a bit stronger than the PS2 is, is still a supported console to boot, and has a control scheme far better suited to FPS's in the first place. How the PS2 has any advantage over it in this case (or any case, really, as far as I can see), I have no idea.
Oh, but what exactly am I hoping to accomplish here? I should know better than to subject a fanboy to something as understandable as basic logic.
CSTGameServers.com
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse PremiumIt's sad that some of you actually complain about this. There is no problem with Minecraft being on the 360. You ***** and whine just because Minecraft is no longer going to be exclusive, this is not affecting you in any way. Sure, some of the new players will join the forums but who cares? Notch is not betraying you in any way, he isn't even behind the development for the console port, it's a set of developers he is paying. You act like that once it is released, the game will become "tainted".
I can't get over that fact that most of you are actually upset over this, it's ridiculous. Apparently you are all spoiled, and can't handle being "the cool kid that owns something everyone else doesn't."
Such a great game, but a ******** community.
The reason I say it should be on PS2 is because the game has low graphics anyway and would be kinda easy to blow off on them. Have the graphics on PS2 be like how you watch Minecraft videos on Youtube with 480p graphics.It's kinda like they did in GTA:San Andreas. They made the game look crappy for PS2 but good on PS3 and XBOX 360. You don't have to make it perfect,just do it,that's all I'm saying.
What the hell are you talking about? Why would you release something on an outdated console? And San Andreas came out on the PS2 and Xbox originally, so I don't know what you are saying there.
LMFAO. Ignoring the blatant subjectivity and bias going on here, it's kind of ironic that you'd prioritize the PS2 of all things over the Wii - even though neither of them have the hardware capability to run Minecraft particularly well, the Wii is still quite a bit stronger than the PS2 is, is still a supported console to boot, and has a control scheme far better suited to FPS's in the first place. How the PS2 has any advantage over it in this case (or any case, really, as far as I can see), I have no idea.
Oh, but what exactly am I hoping to accomplish here? I should know better than to subject a fanboy to something as understandable as basic logic.
-Will Ferral